The authors don’t suggest the vaccine caused cancer at all.
What they found was:
- Vaccinated people had lower overall mortality.
- There was a brief uptick in cancer hospitalizations (not new cancers) in some subgroups, but this went away at 12-month mark.
-They specifically note the signal is likely due to confounding or surveillance bias, not causation.
If the vaccine truly caused cancer, why wouldn’t you see a higher mortality rate in the vaccinated group? 30 months is plenty of time to see a mortality difference.
I read the article with interest.
The authors don’t suggest the vaccine caused cancer at all.
What they found was:
- Vaccinated people had lower overall mortality.
- There was a brief uptick in cancer hospitalizations (not new cancers) in some subgroups, but this went away at 12-month mark.
-They specifically note the signal is likely due to confounding or surveillance bias, not causation.
If the vaccine truly caused cancer, why wouldn’t you see a higher mortality rate in the vaccinated group? 30 months is plenty of time to see a mortality difference.