91 Comments
User's avatar
Proberta's avatar

Let me know if Tucker ever tells the real Truth, that NO PLANES HIT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ON 9/11.

See for yourself. Watch the videos and you will see the perfectly executed controlled demolition of high rise buildings, falling into their own footprint, and dustification.

Then ask the question: What would happen if planes had hit the Towers?

Answer: It would have sprayed death, destruction, debris, shrapnel and body parts all over Lower Manhattan.

Mercifully that did not happen.

No planes hit the World Trade Center on 9/11.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

Bingo! Zero planes on 911. You see plane wreckage in 16ft hole in the side of the Pentagram? Bldg7? Pennsylvania? How about Lucky Larry Silverstein making billions on his recent purchase of towers. Didn't show up for work on 911, nor did his kids. Five dancing Israelis? Nope. FEMA showed up on 9/10. Three weeks later we had troops on the ground in Afghanistan. Sht happens eh?

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Exactly. The videos showing planes hitting the towers were A.I. If you watch closely it's pretty easy to see that.

Expand full comment
JohnM543's avatar

Yes to no commercial airliners. No to controlled demo

Lookup the Hutchinson effect

https://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564/

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar
Sep 25Edited

Sorry....but there's hard replicable evidence for Military Grade Nano-Thermite all over NY city and samples were also taken from erected monuments in parks around the country. Mass Spectrum Analyzers were used to look & identify the explosive used by multiple scientists, from many countries and thus, multiple labs...So, this is replicable verifiable empirical evidence that explosive were used and it's not up for debate or opinion. Additionally, it was Govt. Grade/ Los Alamos made sort of explosives. Not even your average professional demolition contractor can get hold of this stuff.

BUT....I also believe based upon the video tape evidence & melted vehicles, etc. that the Hutchison Effect/Technology was also used.

There were very good reasons why the 9/11 Commission NEVER tested for Explosive nor ever considered Explosives were used, because those explosives carry a resounding fingerprint of the manufacture i.e. The Federal Government.

Regarding the no planes psyop....sorry...there were far to many eye witnesses...that saw with their own eyes planes crashing into the towers. I know videos can be manipulated, but not what people actually see & you won't forget something like that. Just like if you see a UFO (which I have)...you never forget that.

EDIT: I"VE CHANGED MY POSITION on the concept that there were NO PLANES. Disregard original statement...it DOESN'T add up now. Watch this documentary link, that goes into extreme detail about this particular issue.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6SffBFeDfdaG

I'll tell you, what really helped me see the light on this one, was the 1st hand raw testimonies from average folks that were right there, that were looking at the towers when the explosions went off & they DIDN'T see ANY Planes. Noone of them were lying either!

42:25-43:15 (min. mark)

Also, the repeated lies of the Legacy media broadcasters, news reporters and the so called video experts that contradicted themselves over & over again.

I'm now a "There were NO PLANES HIT the TOWERS TRUTHER", but I'll go into that detail with folks later on, just like the DEW-Direct Energy Weapons that were also used to dustify steel structures. Those are deeper subjects, that will require folks to do their OWN research to come to know this as the Truth, at least for me it did.

Peace

Expand full comment
Proberta's avatar

"far to many eye witnesses that saw with their own eyes planes crashing into the towers"

Oh please. Crysis Actors.

Videos of Crysis Actors saying over and over "I saw a plane hit the tower!" and a video of a plane crashing into a tower playing continually and voila! Millions of people believe planes hit the World Trade Center.

No planes hit the World Trade Center on 9/11.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

Correct. If planes hit towers, where's the debris..just like the Pentagram and Penn crash site"? How many lies do people have to see?

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

You'll need more evidence to convince me than Crisis Actors. Were some of the firefighters crisis actors likewise? You need to do more research and if you're actually interested in educating folks about the lies surrounding 9/11, saying the planes didn't hit the towers, because you watched some videos isn't substantial enough, maybe to you, but not most. You'll need harder evidence my friend. Peace

Expand full comment
Proberta's avatar

"You'll need more evidence to convince me"

Josh, if you want to believe that planes hit the towers, that's fine with me.

Millions did.

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar
Sep 25Edited

You have no evidence, bummer.

I was hoping you could provide a really good documentary, from an honorable genuine source investigator, that could dispel my thought process with hard evidence.

Instead, you just want me to trust what you state, even though I saw with my own eyes a plane hit the 2nd tower on live television, while I was sitting at a customers home on that day. I didn't see the 1st plane strike, but the 2nd one was on live television, so you know.

You may be to young to understand how the events played out that day, but those of us around a TV, more than likely witnesses the 2nd plane impact.

One has a hard time ignoring their own 5 senses. I'm sure you understand, since you realize ALL 3 skyscrapers were brought down with Explosives (free-fall-speed) for certain, if not also with Space Age Energy Weapons i.e. Hutchison Effect Technology. Now that's a subject that takes some explaining & research to grasp....AMAZING Technology within the Free-Energy-Domain.

If you think of anything let me know, I'd appreciate it....I'm a Truth-Teller, WHISTLEBLOWER & pride myself on not lying, thus I hate giving out false/inaccurate information if I can. If I don't know, I'll say so....I don't know everything :)

Peace

EDIT: I"VE CHANGED MY POSITION on the concept that there were NO PLANES. Disregard original statement...it DOESN'T add up now. Watch this documentary link, that goes into extreme detail about this particular issue.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6SffBFeDfdaG

I'll tell you, what really helped me see the light on this one, was the 1st hand raw testimonies from average folks that were right there, that were looking at the towers when the explosions went off & they DIDN'T see ANY Planes. Noone of them were lying either!

42:25-43:15 (min. mark)

Also, the repeated lies of the Legacy media broadcasters, news reporters and the so called video experts that contradicted themselves over & over again.

I'm now a "There were NO PLANES HIT the TOWERS TRUTHER", but I'll go into that detail with folks later on, just like the DEW-Direct Energy Weapons that were also used to dustify steel structures. Those are deeper subjects, that will require folks to do their OWN research to come to know this as the Truth, at least for me it did.

Peace

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

I don't know if planes hit the towers or not. It seems there are a lot of eyewitnesses to that happening. All crisis actors seems a stretch. But I don't know. But the firefighters I don't see as relevant. Weren't they dispatched after? They arrived on site after whatever happened to trigger events, and were not there to see if there were planes or no planes.

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

Some Firefighters are on record of seeing a plane hit the towers, just as they witnessed, heard, felt & were blown up by some of the explosions that went off before the towers collapsed.

Expand full comment
CK's avatar

First, commercial airplanes cannot fly at the speeds clocked on radar, not at sea level. The engines do not generate nearly enough thrust to reach those speeds and if they somehow could the plane would fall apart long before it reached 500 mph.

Second, controlled demolition did not bring any buildings down. IF the entirety of those buildings DID collapse are free fall speed (which would violate the laws of physics) it would have destroyed the bathtub and all of lower Manhattan and a huge portion of the subway would have been flooded. There would have also been a seismic signature which was completely lacking on 9/11.

Richard Gage is a disinformation agent and should not be trusted. If you believe what he is selling then you’re being fooled.

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar
Sep 26Edited

First, I'll agree with your 500 mph analysis i.e. That was a lie by the Federal Govt., because planes can't fly that fast at sea level as you said & etc. This is the ONLY correct statement you've made, the rest is a LIE. Do more research.

Second....You're 1000% WRONG that Explosives (Nano-Thermite) were not used and ALL 3 skyscrapers were not brought down at near FREE-FALL-SPEED (within seconds there of Free-Fall-Speed, close enough). Sorry, but you can't disagree with what a precision scientific instruments states, such as a mass spectrum analyzer. Let alone, multiple labs were used to conduct these tests & the results (data sets) were identical in findings, thus this is replication, which is verification & is called empirical evidence. This is how we establish scientific theory's & science laws. ANYONE that disagrees with this, simply needs to educate themselves on how the scientific method works (naive) or they are willfully lying to you. The ONLY way you can drop buildings at FREE-FALL-SPEED is with the use of explosives, hence why it was Common Sense for the 9/11 Commission to TEST for Explosives, which they did not, further demonstrating the level of Corruption within their investigation of 9/11.

3rd....Violates Laws of Physics, nonsense, hence this tells you explosives were in deed used i.e. All structural supports were severed at once...poof! All 3 skyscrapers hit the ground in about 7 to 13.5 seconds. A bowling ball dropped from WTC1&2 would hit the ground in about 10.5 seconds, so you know. The Govt's/NIST's "Pancake Theory" would have required a MINIMUM of 45 seconds for either tower to have collapsed, so we know that's a LIE.

4th....The bath tub was ALMOST destroyed by the explosives that were set off BEFORE the supposed planes strikes, this is on record/verifiable. Some of the massive bath tub walls did move up to 10 inches or more after this occurred, as this may have been one of the plans of our Govt., to flood all of lower Manhattan, to help cover up the crime.

5th...Seismic signatures were picked up all over the place during 9/11, by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (Columbia University), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS).

6th...Richard Gage is a Honest, Genuine, Highly Intelligent Man with obviously more Common Sense than you have and has a grasp upon US History unlike yourself. The mountains of disinformation, pseudo-science and proven lies, emanates solely from the Federal Govt's side of the argument, who clearly FAILED to conduct a proper investigation of 9/11 on purpose.

Richard Gage represents well over 2,700 Architects & Engineers, so you're also challenging their credentials & combined 1,000's of years of experience...lol! Are you feeling okay?

At least you got one thing correct....back to the drawing board, eh?

Peace

Expand full comment
Harriet McCoy's avatar

I have a friend that was in an office building near the towers. She saw it, and was so disturbed by it, she moved to Texas. She also has an entire photo album of the events, and the people walking home afterwards. Someone in her office photographed everything, once they realized what was happening. It is a very moving album. Did the government plan it? I have no idea. I only know what she saw, and the album she has will give you chills.

Expand full comment
Wayne M Baker's avatar

Come on-you can't be serious. Go watch a controlled demolition and tell me the difference from 9/11. Even the firemen believed it was controlled.

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

100% CORRECT Wayne. There are over 150 testimonials from firefighters that herd, felt, witnessed explosive going off e.g. In the Basements, Lobby's, Stairwells and along side of the buildings, as the squib loads were set off right at collapse i.e. FREE-FALL-SPEED.

Mind you...the 9/11 Commission NEVER allowed these trained professionals eye witness testimonies into their report, completely ignored...ALL of them. They never tested for explosives, when before that day NO Human Being had EVER witnessed buildings fall that FAST WITHOUT the AID of Explosives, yet they ignored their own Common Sense.

Peace & keep Critically Thinking & avoiding ALL Gene Therapy Shots & Vaccines.

Expand full comment
Wayne M Baker's avatar

Almost lost my job as a dentist over the Covid vaccine. Took a religious exemption.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

Good for you. You did what worked and what you had to do. But it's pissed me off since pre-COVID that you have to claim religious objections to protect your bodily autonomy and your kids. Nobody should be forced to inject what they don't want. Why only allow certain religious believers to be free? I call BS on that.

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

Well done! I'm proud of you & I'm sure your family is too.

I watched the Dec. 2019 WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit that was leaked and featured on www.thehighwire.com. So, I had a bit of warning THEY were getting desperate & might try something. I've Been researching Vaccine pseudo-science for over 25 years now, thus there's no way in hell I'll ever get ANY Vaccines, let alone Gene Therapy's....lol! I'll take my risk with Father-time :)

1998 Dr. Andrew Wakefield

2000 CDC Simpsonwood Agreement

2015 CDC Whistleblower Dr. William Thompson

2018 VICP Whistleblower Dr. Andrew Zimmerman

Peace

Expand full comment
Rondi's avatar

My husband DID lose a $250,000 annual salary job when he quit because he was hassled and humiliated every day for being a moron/anti vakker.

After a year of that, he had had enough!

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

That sucks and should have never happened.

Expand full comment
Proberta's avatar

"Look up the Hutchinson effect"

Look up Dustification

Expand full comment
4Freedom's avatar

Please tell me what did happen to the planes. I truly do not know. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Proberta's avatar

There were no planes 4Freedom. The planes you saw in the video were added in before the video was released.

Expand full comment
4Freedom's avatar

So, what happened to the planes filled with passengers that took off and crashed? Where? Are the passengers and the families they left behind imaginary, too? No crashes? No dead bodies or body parts? No last goodbye calls to loved ones on the ground? All AI? Good grief!

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

What happened to the planes, people (if real?) we may never know the answer to, but the US Joint Chiefs of Staff/CIA's = "Operation Northwoods" may give us some insight into the logistics/thought process for these sort of "False Flag" operations.

Peace

Expand full comment
Hírháló Nemzeti's avatar

Everyone knows it was an inside job, there were no planes anywhere. WTC 7 just...

Expand full comment
4Freedom's avatar

Subtract me from “Everyone.”

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

What did you learn about "Operation Northwoods"? Thank God JFK was POTUS, eh?.... or we would have gone to War with Cuba based upon lies once again. And once again, innocent American's would have died for these Criminal Deep State Psychopaths i.e. US Civilians, Soldiers & Sailors would have died for nothing, just like 9/11, eh? Just trying to Help you Critically Think & find your Moral Compass.

Peace

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

Many of us have known some of the truth about 9/11 for many years now. It was a lie and a deception by our own government. Recently a new documentary came out called Codex 9/11. It examines the evidence that shows who did what, how it was done, and for what reason. It is the best I have seen yet. I highly recommend it.

https://rumble.com/v6xtnzu-codex-911-premiering-aug-24th-6pm-et.html

Expand full comment
DJL's avatar

Why are we still reporting ANYTHING joy Reid says??? Stop giving stupid the time of day

Expand full comment
Michael G. Fons's avatar

My understanding is that 9/11 was orchestrated by Israeli intelligence, and carried out with help of the staunch Israel supporters within the US goverment, the CIA, and to a lesser degree Saudi intelligence. Christopher Bollyn has a great book on the topic. Here's a video of him discussing it. https://rumble.com/v46uh6o-christopher-bollyn-solving-9-11-the-deception-that-changed-the-world.html

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

Yes, that, but the Bush admin was also involved, not just Mossad. Did you watch the recent documentary Codex 9/11? It is also on Rumble.

Expand full comment
Michael G. Fons's avatar

Yes, I think that the Bush admin was involved to a lesser degree, but that it was orchestrated by Israeli intelligence.

Expand full comment
Barbara Charis's avatar

Our government was totally involved...I saw the look on Bush's face, when he was given the 'news. I could tell that it was no surprise to him. .He just sat there on the little chair in the classroom not moving. I didn't vote for a Republican or /democrat for o er 30 years. There is no difference, when its all about money and power. I was guided to vote for DJT and was not disappointed.. My daughter tried to talk me out of voting for him by listening to his rallies...to point out his flaws. She became one of his biggest fans! He is not a politician and is really not into Party.. He didn't need the job. .He took the job to help get America out of the pit the Democrats and RINOs were digging.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

I'm reluctant to post this because I don't want to unfairly attack any group, although there are certainly groups that deserve it, like demoncrats and pharma shills. But serious question: why are so many who work against us and for the cause of destruction Jews? I just googled Wojcicki because I'd forgotten her cause of death. Why wasn't I surprised to see that she is a Jew? I was never against Israel until they decided, in the words of their own leader, to be "Pfizer's laboratory". What's wrong with those people, seriously? Why on earth would you think that's a good idea? There are reasons, none of them good.

Expand full comment
Michael G. Fons's avatar

I have Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry on my dad's side and am Irish/Italian Catholic on my mom's side. I have friends and family who are Jews, and I think that there are a lot of good Jewish people in the world. That being said, I think that the the idea that Jews are God's chosen people, can cause some Jews to adopt sort of a Jewish supremacist type of ideology, which I think is unhealthy.

Expand full comment
Joseph Kaplan's avatar

Why?

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

Troops on the ground in Afghanistan 3wks later. Been fighting ME wars ever since. "Nothing in politics happens by accident"...FDR

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

$6 Trillion reasons why and that doesn't count all the drugs they trafficked and the oil sold on the black market & etc.. Also, it's what Israel wanted, what the Deep State Psychopaths wanted. Peace

Expand full comment
Joseph Kaplan's avatar

You have some kind of proof of all that. I’d love to see it

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

Here's the $6 Trillion...

https://www.brown.edu/news/2019-11-13/costsofwar#:~:text=Featured%20Events-,The%20cost%20of%20the%20global%20war%20on%20terror:%20$6.4%20trillion,through%20the%20next%20several%20decades.

Drug Trafficking - Opium production was restored after we invaded Afghanistan....just a coincidence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_production_in_Afghanistan#:~:text=In%20July%202000%2C%20Taliban%20leader,following%20the%20September%2011%20attacks.

Rise of the Taliban (1996–2001)

In July 2000,.... The result was a 99% reduction in the area of opium poppy farming in Taliban-controlled areas, roughly three quarters of the world's supply of heroin at the time.[22] The ban was effective only briefly due to the deposition of the Taliban in 2001.

AND

....The Taliban outlawed production again in April 2022, during the poppy harvest.[8] In November 2023, a U.N report showed that in the entirety of Afghanistan, poppy cultivation dropped by over 95%, removing it from its place as being the world's largest opium producer....

https://www.gzeromedia.com/the-graphic-truth-opium-keeps-the-taliban-going#:~:text=Carlos%20Santamaria%20is%20a%20former%20senior%20writer%20at%20GZERO.&text=Ari%20Winkleman%20is%20the%20lead%20designer%20at%20Eurasia%20Group%20and%20GZERO%20Media.&text=The%20Taliban%20(officially)%20banned%20opium,Taliban%20first%20ruled%20the%20country.

In the past, sources estimated that Afghanistan supplied 95% of the heroin sold in Europe. However, this figure is now out of date. The market is shifting due to the Taliban's 2022 ban on opium poppy cultivation, which caused Afghan opium production to drop significantly in 2023.

President Biden completed the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan on August 30, 2021, which ended the 20-year U.S. military presence in the country......just a coincidence that opium production stopped shortly after we left Afghanistan.

Project for the New American Century i.e. Securing interests for the NEOCON's=Likud Party/Deep State/MIC/CIA=Mossad in the Middle East.

"Rebuilding America's Defenses Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century" (written September 2000)

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. (within a year THEY full filled their mission)

The CIA/FBI have been trafficking drugs since the 50's out of Afghanistan, partnered with the Italian Mafia (Luciano), distributed through Pizza Parlors of the USA. The Vietnam War was all about the CIA/Deep State trafficking in Opium, that was started based off a "false flag" (lie - Gulf of Tonkin), just like 9/11 was. As the saying goes, "If Iraq's main export was Broccoli instead of oil, we would have NEVER invaded." lol!

The CIA's Economic Coup upon Venezuela is the same play book today...We're after their oil and then when we get control of the country, then they'll get a even bigger share of the drug trade out of S. America, more so than they have currently today.

Hope this helps I'll try to dig up more sources on the old boys network/deep state/neocons oil for cash deals. Peace

Expand full comment
AaronKM's avatar

Far too many people either disregard or fail to consider the actual science of flight and aerodynamics, as well as jet engine operations amd their limitations as it all pertains to 9/11. The bottom line is that even if absolutely everything about 9/11, as reported, were true, modern commercial aircraft were never designed to perform at the extreme conditions alleged to be seen on video. Not even the most seasoned airline pilots would have been able to overcome the sink rate that would have been required in the case of the Pentagon. Neither would the most seasoned airline pilots have been able to overcome the ground effect generated by flying at such a high airspeed in such close proximity to the ground. In both cases, a commercial jetliner would have disintegrated long before any impacts based on the massive amount of stress placed upon the flight surfaces alone. Commercial jet engines also are not designed to operate at such high airspeeds, so close to earth's surface. Commercial jet engines are designed to operate most efficiently, and can only operate at such speeds at higher alritudes where air is much thinner. Those engines were never designed to gobble up and process the amount of dense air they would at such low altitudes. They would literally flame out and stop producing thrust at all which, if not intervened upon, would ultimately result in a stalled and crashed aircraft.

So, we can honestly say that, if by some stroke of bizarre odds, 9/11 had been pulled off exactly as described, what we should have seen was a day in which two aircraft disintegrated, off course, at incredibly low altitudes and a third aircraft that stalled at an inexplicably low altitude, also off course.

Hey, I don't make science. It's just the most obvious of all things when you understand the principles of flight, aerodynamics, and jet engine operations.

Expand full comment
MeriBear's avatar

No woman taking Tylenol to “spite the President” should be arrested. For what. Let them experience the consequences. FAFO. It is sad, but people need to experience consequences for their actions. A My friend has a ten year old with autism. She is blaming herself but says she never took Tylenol. I told her more is due to come out, like the multitude of vaccines given at one time. HepB given at birth mostly without parents’ consent. Indicated for high risk adult populations and wears off at age five. The reason- To reduce the price for the real patients - hypodermic needle users and gay men during the Fauci-created AIDS crisis. I told her not to blame herself, but sit tight. More to be revealed.

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

Agreed!...Tylenol is just the 1st phase of Environmental Toxins contributing to the cause of Autism....more to come for certain. This was a good test though, it taught RFK how everyone was going to react and how they need to proceed further, regarding the more extreme revelations to come. Peace

2006 CDC Power Point Presentation by Dr. Thomas Needham -

Chemicals Linked to Autism during Pregnancy (Pg.21)

1. Thimerosal 2. Valproic Acid 3. Retinoids 4. Ethanol 5. Lead 6. Thalidomide https://web.archive.org/web/20200303063546/https://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Research/NeuroForum/Needhamfinal04_19_07.pdf

Expand full comment
Jim's avatar

Tucker is years late. There was a great 3 day event this 9/11. https://ic911.org/ Including Senator Ron Johnson. The structural Engineers report from the University of Alaska shows it could not have happened as presented. Also the BBC played the video of planes hitting buildings in England prior to it happening here. Donald Trump at the time said it could not have happened as shown because the iron girders in these 2 buildings were only 18 imchs apart veryically up ythe sides of the buildings. And every president since has renewed the emergency orders that we are still under today.

Expand full comment
sharon's avatar

This is so unresponsible , by ignorant women , when the company says do not take if pregnant . This is beyond belief !

Expand full comment
Proberta's avatar

"by ignorant women"

Nah, most likely Crysis Actors.

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

Nah...brainwashed/indoctrinated progressives/democrats...part of the clergy that just nod their heads as told to do. Probably dyed their hair one too many times likewise or have Botox brain :)

Expand full comment
Shankzula's avatar

https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-308-911-trillions-follow-the-money/

James Corbett has been covering this for decades. Nothing new

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

Tucker would be wise to have James Corbett, Judy Wood & Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth on his show.....with the references & sources to back up everything they state, which anyone can look up at an easy to use website specific to the 9/11 treasonous act.

Just like with the Tylenol/Autism revelation...RFK/Trump need to disseminate or allow easy access for all to see the replicable science, to shut down the Fact-Checkers & doubters. That way anybody can share a quick link to prove folks wrong spreading misinformation or willful ignorance/cognitive dissonance. Peace

Expand full comment
JohnM543's avatar

Let me know when he starts talking about Dr Judy Wood

"Where did the towers go?"

https://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564/

Expand full comment
Graham Hurley's avatar

Tucker Carlson and his team are COINTELPRO. The research by this guy Norman is by far the most comprehensive and all his content should be watched if you want to get the full picture of what took place. https://rumble.com/v6ys3r4-911-narrative-vs.-evidence-david-hughes-interview-with-911-revisionist.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_v

Expand full comment
JohnM543's avatar

100%

Expand full comment
George Shay's avatar

I hope Tucker got a good price when he sold his soul to the devil.

But Mark 8:36

Expand full comment
Privacy Required's avatar

Maybe not. The American people are so uninformed and brainwashed that they must be spoon fed. The information war is very real. Tylenol is the same issue, you can't tell all the uninformed ppl all the sudden they have been poisoned. The TDS libtards would go into full meltdown.

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

Agreed. That can happen to, reality sucks and no one said life would be easy anyways, right:) One thing Covid did teach me that i didn't know...I'm smarter than 5.4 BILLION People on this planet...lol! Peace

Expand full comment
sharon's avatar

As people age we learn more , we open our eyes . we can see the truth !

Our opinions change .

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

I'm a 9/11 Truther and have studied the subject since inception. The "No Planes Hit the Twin Towers Hypothesis/Conspiracy" is simply a psyop to discredit legitimate questions and scientific evidence that conflicts with the official narrative.

I'll agree that no plane hit the pentagon, hence why no video footage has ever been produced that clearly shows a plane hitting that building...when there were camera's all over the place that could have captured what actually struck the pentagon. That was a missile of some sort that struck the pentagon from my research for many reasons.

However, when it comes to WTC1&2, there are far to many 1st hand witnesses, average people...that saw with their own eyes a plane hitting those buildings. The titanium engines would have have punched holes into that steel & concrete structure without issue, while the remainder of the plane would resemble a crunched up aluminium coke can and the jet fuel would have burned up almost instantly as it did.

Now, was it a miliary drone, large aircraft painted up to look like a 767 or was it a real plane with real people or a real plane with a with a fake occupant list? These are still questions to be answered, because the flight pattern and speeds supposedly performed by the pilots, is almost impossible to replicate and mechanically impossible speed wise.

Dr. Judy Wood brought up some compelling points, as to how structures seemed to disappear due to the Hutchison Effect/Technology i.e. DOD/Space Force Tech..

It's my belief that is was a combination of technologies that brought those 3 skyscrapers down at free-fall-speed, which was the Correlating Factor of that tragic day....FREE-FALL-SPEED! DOD Nano-Thermite was certainly used, which was found all over New York and 9/11 memorial sites that were set up around the country. Scientists from the USA & around the world used mass spectrum analyzers to identify the explosive used, which these are precision scientific instruments that don't lie and multiple labs were used, so this is replicable empirical evidence.

Nano-Thermite & Hutchison's Technology is the most likely candidate, as to how these 3 skyscrapers were brought down at free-fall-speed and the abnormal manner which they disintegrated. This also explains all the random abnormal fires/damages & melted vehicles that were in the area.

I know the news medias can edit tapes, but they can't edit what people see with their own eyes. Just as the pentagon...we can see that right after the impact that there was only ONE hole in the pentagon and the rows of windows on either side of the hole, were intact. This would have been an impossibility, because the wings of the plane would have broken every single one of those windows, to the length of the wings & etc. I could go on, but that's enough.

There was no plane that went down in Shanksville, PA, because (& to your 1st point) their was no debris in the field that would ALWAYS occur after a plane crash. Scraps here and there, but no luggage, etc..

9/11 was an inside job....our Multi-BILLION-Dollhair Air National Defense went on vacation that day & purposely stood down while the destruction occurred....whoops!

On that day, the military was conducting drills, simulating hijacked planes that were flown into buildings....just a coincidence.

You have the "Project for the New American Century" thinktank NEOCON's (i.e. Likud Party Shills) calling for another "Pearl Harbor Event", so we can invade the Middle East to steal their oil, natural resources, traffic drugs, fight wars for Israel, etc...this clairvoyant prognostication was written within a year of 9/11...just a coincidence.

Thus, there's plenty of hard factual evidence that can blow open our Govt's Lies about 9/11.

Peace & Keep Critically Thinking & avoiding ALL Gene Therapy Shots & Vaccines in general.

Expand full comment
Baya Lazz's avatar

“The terrain is everything, the plane is nothing.” ~ Claude Bernard

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Gy3Ymc5ogeX9

Expand full comment
Occam's avatar

The government during COVID ABSOLUTELY performed censorship, forcing private corporations to censor Americans in a very serious way. Read Missouri v Biden - lots of examples there - and they have the receipts.

For all of you who might not have access to a dictionary - the union of government and corporations is called FASCISM.

Expand full comment
Ree's avatar

Wow, what stellar investigative reporting, Tucker. FYI there were journalists who talked about that stuff decades ago. Does Michael Ruppert ring any bells? Alex Jones?

Expand full comment
Friggintrip's avatar

It wasn't many people that claimed to be eye witnesses, it was just a few paid actors who were played continuously on mockingbird media feeding the masses to fit the narrative. Go back and find out who those particular eye witnesses were and then research their background. Everyone who claimed to be an eye witness on mockingbird media had ties to government agencies or officials. The supposed hijacker's passport was found unscathed just up the road from the WTC? Come on now!! Then there was the news helicopter reporter who said there was an explosion but no plane or the reporter at the Pentagon who said there wasn't the first piece of an airplane 🤔

How is it the that a bird can cause significant damage to a plane in flight or just a simple fiberglass light pole can rip a wing off of an airplane, but you actually believe that an airplane can penetrate a building constructed from concrete and reinforced steel that was built to withstand the impact of a large passenger plane. Take the blinders off and think with logic.

REAL EYES 👀

REALIZE 🤔

REAL LIES 🙃

Expand full comment
Josh's avatar

Average folks and firefighters saw the planes/a plane hit the tower(s). I understand your points..film can be edited easily/legacy media was in on 9/11 to some degree/ties to the govt. (Did someone already research the eyewitnesses? If you know of an investigation let me know)

The hijackers passport was planted by the CIA/FBI/DOD, etc.

News Helicopter saw the explosion on WTC1 or 2, but stated there was no airplane? REALLY!?!? This I haven't seen if you have a link on that one, let me know as well.

Pentagon, I'm familiar with...there was no plane, it was a missile that left one hole and the row of windows on both sides of the impact hole were INTACT. You could see the foam fire retardant that was sprayed on the building to put out the fire and the windows were still intact? The planes wings would have smashed out those windows, to the length of the wingspan, but this didn't happen.

Agreed...A small bird flying into a jet engine will destroy it. Just as a light pole will slice through the planes wing very easily and no debate.

However, the Pentagon should have had 3 holes in it i.e. 2 for each titanium engine and 1 for the fuselage of the plane. Again, the Pentagon only had ONE Hole, so not a plane.

Likewise, those same titanium engines could have EASILY punched 2 holes into the steel/concrete towers, while the rest of the aluminum/partial steel airplane would be like a squished coke can, but would still cause serious damage to the outer structure of the towers and a huge fireball. This is all due to speed.

Each of those towers were designed to handle the impact of TWO Boeing 707's when they were built (per engineer who designed them), so neither should have fallen due to a plane strike, even though it was a bigger plane (767).

Let me know if you got any links for the aforementioned...I'm open, but it's suspect in my eyes.

I was sitting in a customers house with the TV on and we all watched the plane hit the 2nd tower, supposedly as it happened, minus whatever delay. It was then, I stated, "This was no accident & it was intentional." to my customers. This was my 1st hand experience and I understand the footage could have been manipulated, but it was supposedly a Live Feed from the news after the 1st tower had already been struck.?.?

Peace

Peace

Expand full comment
Baya Lazz's avatar

They had pictures of 'the virus' from day one but they were cgi. Electron microscopes don't make color images. September 11th was the date when the last 'smallpox' death was claimed to have occurred. According to wikipedia Janet Parker was a British"medical photographer in the Anatomy Department. She often worked in a darkroom above the laboratory where research on smallpox viruses was being conducted."

https://odysee.com/@JackFrostExperience:c/Dr-Stefan-Lanka-Pandemic-Theater:b

Expand full comment