I've seen multiple articles about people facing a similar decision who choose "not chemo" since Newman's decision. My mother passed away from the big C in '01. She was pushed into the Conventional Western Medical route of chemo and drugs despite being told there was zero chance of success. Now, with there being up to 6 different ways available to kill cancer cells, or to prevent cancer cells from continuing to live & thrive, there's really no need to feed the "chemo machine" any more.
There's really only one decision for anyone who wants to continue their life with dignity, and with a better chance of success than the entire conventional western medical route of chemo and Big Phrama drugs. There's Dr Burzynski, whom the TX Med Board & FDA have spent over $250M attempting to take his patent and attempted to put him in jail for daring to create his own pharmaceutical company and his own cancer curing drug. Thankfully, the FDA and TX Medical Board have failed up to this point. All of these documents are legal documents are are public record for anyone willing to do their homework to check my words. They have succeeded in limiting his marketing and reach by limiting all sales to the state of TX over the past 40+ years.
There's the CIA known, wormwood route, which is the main ingredient in Ivermectin. Combining that with Fenbendazole and/or Menbedazole has lead to over 8,000 testimonials of successful healing - for cancer sufferers who've been told by programmed doctors that there's only one way.
That leads to the CIA known cleaning of parasites, the DMSO route, and the fasting route. Understanding how the cancer cells eats, and its need for sugar, glucose, and how it takes in glycogen stores makes this one quite obvious for even the least of the biology and chemistry people like me. (I am stating that I am not an expert, but I do read and educate myself to the way the body actually works instead of just trusting what the messaging tries to tell me via television, news, movies, etc.)
Of course, there's Otto' Warburg's proven science of cutting off the oxygen supply for cancer and Warburg's winning of the Nobel Prize in Physiology for his work showing cancer's susceptibility to an oxygenated environment in 1931. That's 6 ways to rid the body of cancer with less money, pain, and less headache. Yet, if anyone shares these details; their words are ostracized, they are vilified for daring to think or believe there's another Source higher than the Conventional Medical community, and they are killed in the press and sometimes killed in real life for challenging the Evil Empire's system.
It important to note and share that the cure to cancer has been here, in many forms, for YEARS. Dr Thomas Seyfried PhD, proved how cancer cells can be starved without starving the patient because the cancer cells only use two fuels - glucose & glutamine. This is based on the science of Warburg, but continued to its conclusion.
You can use nutrition to achieve this without the need for ANY dangerous treatments that are commonly used in current times.
Dr Eric Berg has shared practical nutrition information to accomplish this.
Both have shared full citations of the science. Results have shown success for all forms of cancer, all stages, all ages ... even for supposed inoperable tumors, such as gioplastomas.
It should be obvious why "BigPharma" ignores, or even tries to suppress, such life saving information - if they can't patent it, they can't profit from it. In addition, the affordable cure from Mother Nature & human biology threatens their VERY profitable (but dangerous) cancer treatments.
The same is true for "BigCorp" (monopolies) who profit from so many foods & other products that CAUSE cancer in the first place. Corporations that have proven to value Profits over Lives certainly lack morals, and will not change until We the People force them to do so.
We do this either by policy, regulations & laws - which have a history of failure, loopholes & corruption - OR by voting with our dollar by spending on healthier options.
The latter is much more effective in the short term because you can rely on their Greed for Profits to force them to self correct.
The former is required, as well, long term to deal with companies that lack morals, which shouldn't exist based on common sense, but history has proven are far too common.
Options appear limited because of the "allowance" of excessive monopolization in nearly all areas of Capitalism, undermining the competition that will keep it healthy. ALL Monopolies should be banned in ALL forms, as they lead to corruption & evil practices, sooner or later, if not by design in the first place.
If I was ever to become terminal or have a condition that was less than 70 % survival I would go home and let Jesus come get me. I also would not go through Chemo I have seen what that does to you only to have cancer return.
It's not always possible to die at home. Right now I'm writing from the icu. My father in law had what appeared to be a seizure last Monday afternoon. Tuesday morning in the ER it got worse and he aspirated. They only option they gave us was to let him choke to death and panic, or put the vent in for 3 days. They promised it didn't go against his dnr.
Fast forward to the other day, his lungs just stopped working. No explanation. No call, they just turned on full life support. Which he did not want.
Now the doctors are saying there might be an infection and to give them to Friday and then if not better let him go.
This isn't what we planned. This isn't what we were told was a possibility or we NEVER would have done this. Now my wife is forced to make a choice of when to let him die because the icu didn't let it happen naturally.
If we had the option to have him die at home or knew this would happen a week later, we wouldn't have done this.
You can't trust these hospitals, but once you go in you don't have a choice really. They just do things. Barely explain what's going on. He's just alive now so people can come and say goodbye.
The Midwestern Doctor's content is great and so very helpful!! But, why clutter up the articles with numerous irrelevant pictures?? They add nothing, it makes the article unnecessarily long and it takes extra time to scroll past them. What's the point of interspersing so many of them between every two or three sentences???
My friend at work was very upset about his fathers inevitable death. Old guy, lived a full life, his wife had just passed away. My friend wanted his father to be more active, try everything to live. Light exercise.
I finally told my friend, "Suppose he does what you want. He is old. If he lives for another five years, he will be back to dying again. Will you continue to torment him to be more active?"
I think It made him accept his father's death was inevitable. He quit complaining about his father quietly resting and accepting death.
After watching my father expire, I have considered hospitals a terrible place to die... Not that the hospital was guilty of anything but I think the method steals something from people.
Pain is a message and real pain comes in waves. The size of the wave conveys the seriousness of the injury that needs attention and the gaps between waves allows opportunity to do something about it. Once someone senses there is nothing to be done, they settle into acceptance and the pain recedes...this gives peace and the opportunity to embrace what comes next. (just my opinion, I have limited experience)
Unfortunately it is now behind a paywall, but the post from Rupert Sheldrake on his anecdotal study of pet animal death, strongly suggests animals often know when their time is up. He was subsequently contacted by a researcher that had found similar experiences with people who died 'naturally'. ...https://substack.com/home/post/p-160796058
As my dad was dying, even though he was unconscious he would struggle against the lack of oxygen, so the nurse kept adding painkiller which subdued his struggle. I have wondered ever since if he didn't know he was dying because he never had the chance to experience and come to terms with it.... In other words, hospitals extend the pain by drawing out or obscuring the moment of acceptance......this is just my opinion of course, but I have an idea I'd like to expire under a tree on a very cold but starlit winters night...nowhere near a hospital.
Better to go a week too early than a week too late. As time goes by I find myself being in support of euthanasia as long as certain protocols and guidelines are followed. Coping w/the medical system is a nightmare, let people die in peace at home.
I've seen multiple articles about people facing a similar decision who choose "not chemo" since Newman's decision. My mother passed away from the big C in '01. She was pushed into the Conventional Western Medical route of chemo and drugs despite being told there was zero chance of success. Now, with there being up to 6 different ways available to kill cancer cells, or to prevent cancer cells from continuing to live & thrive, there's really no need to feed the "chemo machine" any more.
There's really only one decision for anyone who wants to continue their life with dignity, and with a better chance of success than the entire conventional western medical route of chemo and Big Phrama drugs. There's Dr Burzynski, whom the TX Med Board & FDA have spent over $250M attempting to take his patent and attempted to put him in jail for daring to create his own pharmaceutical company and his own cancer curing drug. Thankfully, the FDA and TX Medical Board have failed up to this point. All of these documents are legal documents are are public record for anyone willing to do their homework to check my words. They have succeeded in limiting his marketing and reach by limiting all sales to the state of TX over the past 40+ years.
There's the CIA known, wormwood route, which is the main ingredient in Ivermectin. Combining that with Fenbendazole and/or Menbedazole has lead to over 8,000 testimonials of successful healing - for cancer sufferers who've been told by programmed doctors that there's only one way.
That leads to the CIA known cleaning of parasites, the DMSO route, and the fasting route. Understanding how the cancer cells eats, and its need for sugar, glucose, and how it takes in glycogen stores makes this one quite obvious for even the least of the biology and chemistry people like me. (I am stating that I am not an expert, but I do read and educate myself to the way the body actually works instead of just trusting what the messaging tries to tell me via television, news, movies, etc.)
Of course, there's Otto' Warburg's proven science of cutting off the oxygen supply for cancer and Warburg's winning of the Nobel Prize in Physiology for his work showing cancer's susceptibility to an oxygenated environment in 1931. That's 6 ways to rid the body of cancer with less money, pain, and less headache. Yet, if anyone shares these details; their words are ostracized, they are vilified for daring to think or believe there's another Source higher than the Conventional Medical community, and they are killed in the press and sometimes killed in real life for challenging the Evil Empire's system.
It important to note and share that the cure to cancer has been here, in many forms, for YEARS. Dr Thomas Seyfried PhD, proved how cancer cells can be starved without starving the patient because the cancer cells only use two fuels - glucose & glutamine. This is based on the science of Warburg, but continued to its conclusion.
You can use nutrition to achieve this without the need for ANY dangerous treatments that are commonly used in current times.
Dr Eric Berg has shared practical nutrition information to accomplish this.
Both have shared full citations of the science. Results have shown success for all forms of cancer, all stages, all ages ... even for supposed inoperable tumors, such as gioplastomas.
It should be obvious why "BigPharma" ignores, or even tries to suppress, such life saving information - if they can't patent it, they can't profit from it. In addition, the affordable cure from Mother Nature & human biology threatens their VERY profitable (but dangerous) cancer treatments.
The same is true for "BigCorp" (monopolies) who profit from so many foods & other products that CAUSE cancer in the first place. Corporations that have proven to value Profits over Lives certainly lack morals, and will not change until We the People force them to do so.
We do this either by policy, regulations & laws - which have a history of failure, loopholes & corruption - OR by voting with our dollar by spending on healthier options.
The latter is much more effective in the short term because you can rely on their Greed for Profits to force them to self correct.
The former is required, as well, long term to deal with companies that lack morals, which shouldn't exist based on common sense, but history has proven are far too common.
Options appear limited because of the "allowance" of excessive monopolization in nearly all areas of Capitalism, undermining the competition that will keep it healthy. ALL Monopolies should be banned in ALL forms, as they lead to corruption & evil practices, sooner or later, if not by design in the first place.
If I was ever to become terminal or have a condition that was less than 70 % survival I would go home and let Jesus come get me. I also would not go through Chemo I have seen what that does to you only to have cancer return.
It's not always possible to die at home. Right now I'm writing from the icu. My father in law had what appeared to be a seizure last Monday afternoon. Tuesday morning in the ER it got worse and he aspirated. They only option they gave us was to let him choke to death and panic, or put the vent in for 3 days. They promised it didn't go against his dnr.
Fast forward to the other day, his lungs just stopped working. No explanation. No call, they just turned on full life support. Which he did not want.
Now the doctors are saying there might be an infection and to give them to Friday and then if not better let him go.
This isn't what we planned. This isn't what we were told was a possibility or we NEVER would have done this. Now my wife is forced to make a choice of when to let him die because the icu didn't let it happen naturally.
If we had the option to have him die at home or knew this would happen a week later, we wouldn't have done this.
You can't trust these hospitals, but once you go in you don't have a choice really. They just do things. Barely explain what's going on. He's just alive now so people can come and say goodbye.
The Midwestern Doctor's content is great and so very helpful!! But, why clutter up the articles with numerous irrelevant pictures?? They add nothing, it makes the article unnecessarily long and it takes extra time to scroll past them. What's the point of interspersing so many of them between every two or three sentences???
My friend at work was very upset about his fathers inevitable death. Old guy, lived a full life, his wife had just passed away. My friend wanted his father to be more active, try everything to live. Light exercise.
I finally told my friend, "Suppose he does what you want. He is old. If he lives for another five years, he will be back to dying again. Will you continue to torment him to be more active?"
I think It made him accept his father's death was inevitable. He quit complaining about his father quietly resting and accepting death.
After watching my father expire, I have considered hospitals a terrible place to die... Not that the hospital was guilty of anything but I think the method steals something from people.
Pain is a message and real pain comes in waves. The size of the wave conveys the seriousness of the injury that needs attention and the gaps between waves allows opportunity to do something about it. Once someone senses there is nothing to be done, they settle into acceptance and the pain recedes...this gives peace and the opportunity to embrace what comes next. (just my opinion, I have limited experience)
Unfortunately it is now behind a paywall, but the post from Rupert Sheldrake on his anecdotal study of pet animal death, strongly suggests animals often know when their time is up. He was subsequently contacted by a researcher that had found similar experiences with people who died 'naturally'. ...https://substack.com/home/post/p-160796058
As my dad was dying, even though he was unconscious he would struggle against the lack of oxygen, so the nurse kept adding painkiller which subdued his struggle. I have wondered ever since if he didn't know he was dying because he never had the chance to experience and come to terms with it.... In other words, hospitals extend the pain by drawing out or obscuring the moment of acceptance......this is just my opinion of course, but I have an idea I'd like to expire under a tree on a very cold but starlit winters night...nowhere near a hospital.
I respect choosing "not chemo" and "not Western medicine."
However! I don't think we should laud anyone for giving up, even though it is certainly his or her choice to make.
“Giving up”?
There comes a point for all of us who do not die suddenly:
Ask yourself if what you are pursuing is actually prolonging Life as you define “living”, or prolonging the dying process.
Some chose to live more fully under their own terms and possible die a bit sooner. A good Hospice provider can help ensure this path.
Others choose to “fight” although futile, and die possibly few days or weeks later, often, almost always in prolonged misery.
Yes, true.
Better to go a week too early than a week too late. As time goes by I find myself being in support of euthanasia as long as certain protocols and guidelines are followed. Coping w/the medical system is a nightmare, let people die in peace at home.
All TRUE!!!!! Thank you
Who is the Midwestern doctor? He’s had some good advice in the past