22 Comments
User's avatar
Burly's avatar

Does it mean that if Ukraine gets in, the US can get out? Should we first check with Little Lindsey, or Victoria? Sorry, but sounds like a total BOHICA to me.

Expand full comment
Al X G's avatar

Counting on The Don for deescalation yikes!

Expand full comment
NJ Election Advisor's avatar

Counting ON

or

Counting DOWN?

Expand full comment
TheGreatAwakening's avatar

RFKJ ***NEVER*** said wear a "government-approved" wearable so that the "government" can monitor anything about you.

Exact transcript:

Rep. Balderson:

Secretary Kennedy, there is a tremendous amount of research that shows that greater engagement with health leads to better outcomes. In recent years, American innovators have created devices so that not only are consumers better able to engage with their health, but they are able to share that data with providers. I believe American consumers, in line with the 21st Century Cures Act, should be able to access these wellness tools. Do you agree that consumers should continue to have access to these tools?

Sec. Kennedy:

Absolutely. In fact, we are about to launch one of the biggest advertising campaigns in HHS history to encourage Americans to use wearables. It is a way people can take control of their own health. They can take responsibility. They can see what food is doing to their glucose levels, their heart rates, and a number of other metrics as they eat it. And they can begin to make good judgments about their diet, their physical activity, about the way that they live their lives.

We think that wearables are a key to the agenda of making America healthy again, and my vision is that every American is wearing a wearable within four years.

Rep. Balderson:

Thank you, Mr. Secretary. Following up on my previous question: What steps will you take? You said you are doing a big announcement next week to access health tools to track, monitor, and improve health while also ensuring patient data privacy and security protections. In dealing with some of that, I have had questions where I have spoken at medical groups about wearables and privacy. Do you have anything reassuring for that? Or will that be part of the announcement?

Sec. Kennedy:

As I said, we will do a major advertising campaign encouraging Americans to wear wearables. I have personally had friends who changed their lives just from wearing a glucose meter. They have lost weight, they have lost their diabetes diagnosis—and you see this happen again and again and again. It really has a miraculous impact on health in our country.

It is $80 per month. We are exploring ways of making sure that those costs can be paid for. The Ozempic is costing $1,300 per month. If you can achieve the same thing with an $80 wearable, it is better for the American people.

Rep. Balderson:

Great to hear. My office is also doing the same thing.

Expand full comment
Proberta's avatar

What they don't tell you about "wearables" is that the nanotechnology in the device is able to access your neurological system..

New World 0rder Agenda 21 - 'All non-essential humans will be mass-connected to Artificial Intelligence'.

Like the self-assembling nanotechnology in the C0vid vaxxines that mass-connected the vaxxed to the 5(G) grid, the AI motherboard, for life.

Or your "Official I.D." which you will be required to carry at all times.

Or your Digital Currency card you will need to buy food.

Or your wearables.

Ultimate goal of NW0 Agenda 21, all non-essential humans are vaxxed and mass-connected to Artificial Intelligence.

Expand full comment
Mooon's avatar

Terrorists did attack on 9/11. Definitely the worst terrorists the world has ever known but, not Arabs or Muslims as everyone was brainwashed into believing. These particular terrorists run all main-stream media, as well as the schools, universities, and many “Christian” churches.

Expand full comment
TexBritta's avatar

Bush knew about it. He was in on it. IMO and many others. That scum MF.

Expand full comment
Mooon's avatar

Yes. They all knew ahead of time. Thing is.. big joo has had the us held hostage for about 28 years now by planting bombs in many cities. 9/11 was a demonstration and proof.

Expand full comment
Anthony Sejda's avatar

11 were wahabi fundamentalist from Saudi, but were considered corrupted by western decadence.

Expand full comment
Proberta's avatar

"Trump is the only one calling for de-escalation."

Right. Trump just attacked Iran.

And last month he bombed Yemen.

And did you forget all those women, children and civilians he killed in Syria?

Expand full comment
Proberta's avatar

"Humanoid robots are about to replace millions of American jobs—and not even Trump’s manufacturing revival may be enough to stop it."

Trump has no intention of stopping AI.

In case, like everyone else, you were deliberately distracted by the Trump and Elon divorce, Trump's BBB bill contains a bill contradicting the US Constitution by attempting to circumvent the rights of the states to pass laws against A.I..

Expand full comment
Deborah's avatar

If people were on the ball the First time and actually knew what an EO was (now they're all 20/20 hindsight with this terminology) they would have seen that this One signed ai involvement into our government.

Expand full comment
Deborah's avatar

Right. He's all fake scripted talk (even though it's sixth grade level language and speaking skills) but it doesn't matter because the majority here and the world aren't willing to see the writing on the wall. And speaking of That perfect source. "He shall cause all, great and small, free and slave, rich and poor to be unable to buy or sell."

Expand full comment
reality speaks's avatar

Humanoids Robots is the result of the stupid minimum wage, Price labor to high and you get less of it.

Expand full comment
Phil Davis's avatar

I may have mentioned this before. But Martin's Economic Confidence Model shows Ukrainian currency flatlines this decade and into the next. His model has never produced such a forecast, which means no more Ukraine.

The Neocons are determined to use Ukraine as the vanguard to soften up Russia before a NATO attack. Trump is trying to stay out of the way; let's hope he does. BTW, the Neocons have moved to the EU using their limited resources. I expect some false flags to get a reason for a NATO attack.

Expand full comment
Sphen's avatar

Well Trump has demonstrated he's ahead of the UN's game. And pushing toward de- escalation. Knowing that one of the horsemen ie War. Is one that no matter overcoming famine and plague it's always just on the horizon for us.

So buckle up Dorothy this ride isn't over yet. Humans being Humans.

Expand full comment
Charlotte Ruse's avatar

Interesting how NATO met at the

Hague where it just so happens The International Criminal Court (ICC) is located. This court is responsible for prosecuting individuals accused of international crimes against humanity. This includes war crimes resulting in genocide.🤔

Expand full comment
George Shay's avatar

Putin is a paper tiger. He can't even beat Ukraine, a third rate power, after 3 years of the most intense ground combat since WWII. There's no way he will go nuclear over Ukraine.

Expand full comment
KenO's avatar

Sounds like you’re commenting on his chess game while playing checkers.

Expand full comment
George Shay's avatar

Sounds like he’s trying to overcomplicate a simple fact set. Vlad doesn't play complex games. He’s a blunt instrument.

Expand full comment
Richard Leger's avatar

Not everybody plays your 1D chess.

Expand full comment
George Shay's avatar

It’s obvious. It’s simple. Don't overcimolicate.

Expand full comment