I'm sorry, but this "study" is just a smart-Alec way of reinforcing all the mainstream "truths": That there was a deadly virus known as Covid; that the shots were designed to save lives; and that, although they ended up saving fewer lives than initially thought, save lives they did.
Similarly, I watched a totally unrelated YouTube clip yesterday, with a highly articulate and personable young woman in Canada talking anti-establishment stuff about jobs and the economy. At one point, when she mentioned how people will read a couple random articles and run with whatever impression they came away with, a banner saying "This is how anti-vaxxers are created" was flashed on the screen. So I'm guessing, the whole tirade was in reality just another jab infomercial. And, by the way, not one person picked up on that in the many comments underneath the video.
This is where we are today. The insidious media propaganda, the desperate-for-approval young demographic: Things aren't all that different from what they were in 2021/22.
This is the kind of analysis that should have been welcomed—if not demanded—from the very beginning. It doesn’t negate that vaccines may have helped certain demographics, but it exposes how blanket strategies were substituted for nuanced, data-driven decision-making. When public health became indistinguishable from public relations, dissenting scientists were treated as threats instead of necessary correctives.
The real takeaway here isn’t just about the numbers—it’s about what happens when cost-benefit calculations are replaced with ideological certainty. That substitution isn’t science. It’s dogma dressed in lab coats.
And while this study is significant, the greater reckoning will come when we examine how the language of “safety” was weaponized to justify suppression, shame, and systemic coercion—especially toward populations that were never meaningfully at risk.
If risk stratification had been treated as a cornerstone instead of an inconvenience, global trust in public health might not be unraveling right now.
I'm sorry, but this "study" is just a smart-Alec way of reinforcing all the mainstream "truths": That there was a deadly virus known as Covid; that the shots were designed to save lives; and that, although they ended up saving fewer lives than initially thought, save lives they did.
Similarly, I watched a totally unrelated YouTube clip yesterday, with a highly articulate and personable young woman in Canada talking anti-establishment stuff about jobs and the economy. At one point, when she mentioned how people will read a couple random articles and run with whatever impression they came away with, a banner saying "This is how anti-vaxxers are created" was flashed on the screen. So I'm guessing, the whole tirade was in reality just another jab infomercial. And, by the way, not one person picked up on that in the many comments underneath the video.
This is where we are today. The insidious media propaganda, the desperate-for-approval young demographic: Things aren't all that different from what they were in 2021/22.
This is the kind of analysis that should have been welcomed—if not demanded—from the very beginning. It doesn’t negate that vaccines may have helped certain demographics, but it exposes how blanket strategies were substituted for nuanced, data-driven decision-making. When public health became indistinguishable from public relations, dissenting scientists were treated as threats instead of necessary correctives.
The real takeaway here isn’t just about the numbers—it’s about what happens when cost-benefit calculations are replaced with ideological certainty. That substitution isn’t science. It’s dogma dressed in lab coats.
And while this study is significant, the greater reckoning will come when we examine how the language of “safety” was weaponized to justify suppression, shame, and systemic coercion—especially toward populations that were never meaningfully at risk.
If risk stratification had been treated as a cornerstone instead of an inconvenience, global trust in public health might not be unraveling right now.