What he doesn't realise - and he should - is that from the 1980s (big tobacco realised they couldn't hide the harms caused by their products any longer) to the early 2000s, major tobacco companies like Philip Morris (now part of Altria Group) and R.J. Reynolds had significant ownership of several prominent food companies, influencing the U.S. food system. They included harmful ingredients that are addictive to this day.
Did you see his interactions with RFK Jr during the confirmation hearings? Bernie will bend like a pretzel to try to stay on the Dem talking points that he has always attacked.
But seriously, I'm PRO jab...for ALL of them. It could be (STILL) taking out the right people. Or is that mean? I'm still a little bitter...sorry. You might want to look up Mark Crispin Miller for the weekly latest.
Not really...the ones that would have been the prison guards circa 1940ish...the Brownshirts screaming, WEAR A MASK and GET VACCINATED or you'll kill <add the list of people here>...the unvaccinated will have a dark winter...that side. Not that I'm bitter.
Capitalists may have fucked EVERYTHING up in the quest for profit maximization,.....but somehow,....when it comes to The Health of The Public.....they draw a fat red line and do everything by the book.
Bernie’s handlers made a bad decision to let Bernie spar with Joe Rogan. The liars have been covered by the dishonest media cabal for so long they started to believe their lies were unchallengeable. Whoops! Up pops an intelligent, truthful host asking poignant questions and it’s get me out of here! What would it be like if we had our legacy media doing an honest job of reporting the news and allowing real differences of opinion to be discussed. It would be like the Joe Rogan Show.
I appreciate a LOT about what you write...HOWEVER, your analysis of Joe Rogan's dialog with Bernie Sanders was AWFUL...it was HYPER-BIASED...and plain-old inaccurate. These two gentleman had a tremendous amount of agreement. Even BEFORE Joe Rogan began to provide a critique of the billionaires who support the Democrats, Bernie ALREADY began to provide this same concern.
It is pathetic how each side SPINS information to one side or another. A lot of us are sick and tired of this. PLease try for more accuracy and objectivity in your reporting. You KNOW how to do this...DO IT!
They didn’t talk about girls and boys sports. They talked about stuff that affects millions of lives not stuck on bathrooms and sports that applies to a couple hundred people, if that.
I don't think he was necessarily defending billionaires so much as questioning the reasoning what would enable a corrupt and incompetent government. Rogan seemed to agree that so much consolidated power is a bad thing
The puppets are not the problem, - the puppet masters ARE the problem. "Trump, Dementia Joe, Hildo", etc., are all just puppets and mouthpieces of the "Billionaire Boys Club", - it's THEY who are the "enemy" of WE THE PEOPLE....
So supporting a billionaire is worshiping them? NOT!
What is worse:
A. A billionaire who creates real things and services, provides jobs with healthcare and retirement benefits to support the families of the workers and also provides a tax base, or
B. A multi-millionaire who has become rich solely in politics who has made nothing but complaints, provided only mostly complaints, maybe a few staffing jobs, useless or red-tape legislation, is enriching himself with millions of dollars from lobbyists from Big Pharma and the Climate Grift Scientists and their "Green" companies.
C. A billionaire who uses their money to create organizations that provide money to people like Antifa who want destructive anarchy and only seek to destroy, create chaos, lawlessness, and disorder. (Soros)
Leave your knee-jerk communist-planted hate the rich myths behind and use logic and reasoning. Question Authority and demand accountability from all of them, not just one side.
Gary, you sound like you have a lot of issues. You should however cite your sources that prove Sanders is making money off big pharma. You’re way off base if you think pharmaceuticals are going to support a man who calls for universal health care.
You should take a deep breath and actually listen to the program before commenting.
Rogan is a meathead and a greedy sob who pushes his brand shamelessly. He has done some good interviews but he is not an intellectual--he's an entertainer and comedian.
Rogan has done some excellent interviews. On global warming here he was right on. On vaccines, on US imperialism, etc.. But if he had someone on to expose how private equity and hedge funds are looting the country, his red state Republicans would drop him like a hot potato.
Not at all. I'm one of his Republican listeners. I'm not bothered by his overall leftist views. He's been historically anti-gun. He's honest about his positions. That's all I require. It's more the elected politicians than the populace (for both parties) that like the crony capitalist crap. Support for preventing politicians from profiting from their insider knowledge is probably a 95-5 percent issue among Americans and the reverse among the political class.
I'm willing to bet he would do better than either of us on a test of general knowledge. He's spent years listening to some of the most intelligent informed people in the world. On the other hand, on the issues we care about deeply, he seems ignorant. Three hours of conversation can't replace years of study. Are you really trying to put forward the notion that the hosts on MSDNC or Fox News are intellectuals? Rachel Maddow and Mark Levin (sorry, Sean Hannity is operating with about 30 fewer IQ points than either of them) are both intelligent, but they are performance artists every bit as much as Joe Rogan. They are just less funny and more dishonest.
I don't watch cable TV. Napolitano has excellent interviews of very serious intellects such as John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs, former CIA people, had Nader on a few weeks ago. Lew Rockwell has serious writers.
He forgot the red flag, a/k/a room elephant: We have not just one, rather, we have fifty-one constitutions because our agents cannot be trusted.
That the ones who should be going after those who violate one or more of the constitutions do not, serves as yet more proof even more than the constitutions are needed (e.g., the Declaration of Independence).
Actually nicotine is not addictive. It's the pyrazines added that are addictive. I use nicotine patch 3 mg daily to counter the effects of what's in or transmitted from the covid jabs, at the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor sites found on my cells.. But if I forget it I don't crave it. Also the nightshades have naturally occurring nicotine in them.
It is shocking how public figures who influence many people are ignorant of facts about issues that touch millions (billions?) of lives. Like climate. Regarding such a matter, how can a politician not investigate the issue for himself from a - z to inform himself? The same goes to a man who is very prominent right now, namely Jeffrey Sachs. He knows everything there is to know about US foreign policy, etc etc but attends the same climate briefings as uncle Bernie and believes what he is told. When a story is fantastic, investigate yourself, e.g. covid, climate....
I suppose you’re a scientist that REALLY knows the truth about climate. Let’s use a brain cell and guess which side is more financially equipped to do these scientific studies and to publish them. Would that be the billion dollar corporations or the universities? I will treat that rhetorically, So if the universities had made shit up, how come the billion dollar corporations can’t get their “legitimate studies” onto the billion dollar media platforms that they own to castrate the false flags sent out by the university?
Not a climate scientist but a retired researcher, so, I know the research environment well. Just like during covid when doctors who successfully treated their patients were fired, lost their licences, were belittled etc, climate scientists who question the climate hysteria narrative don't receive research funding and/or are let go, etc. That is not how science works. You SHOULD question everything. When you are totally objective the truth puts its hand up and becomes undeniable. 2 brief points: we're now experiencing the coldest climate in 485 million years according to a Washington Post article (!) of 2024-09-19 and we're slowly entering an ice age. We've been in an interglacial period, meaning already in an ice age for millenia. Second, CO2 is an essential, life sustaining gas which is at extremely low levels currently. It's impact on temperatures, as a greenhouse gas is limited and it has already the level where increased CO2 levels cannot further affect climate or temperatures. Kindly visit the CO2coalition.org website and experience a total absence of alarmism, coupled with actual scientific facts, presented by real scientists and supported by real data, not computer models.
Not a climate scientist but a retired researcher, so, I know the research environment well. Just like during covid when doctors who successfully treated their patients were fired, lost their licences, were belittled etc, climate scientists who question the climate hysteria narrative don't receive research funding and/or are let go, etc. That is not how science works. You SHOULD question everything. When you are totally objective the truth puts its hand up and becomes undeniable. 2 brief points: we're now experiencing the coldest climate in 485 million years according to a Washington Post article (!) of 2024-09-19 and we're slowly entering an ice age. We've been in an interglacial period, meaning already in an ice age for millenia. Second, CO2 is an essential, life sustaining gas which is at extremely low levels currently. It's impact on temperatures, as a greenhouse gas is limited and it has already the level where increased CO2 levels cannot further affect climate or temperatures. Kindly visit the CO2coalition.org website and experience a total absence of alarmism, coupled with actual scientific facts, presented by real scientists and supported by real data, not computer models.
I completely agree on challenging everything, particularly on today’s environment. I still am skeptical that big oil can’t fund research to override the science being proffered by most of the world. I am not scientifically inclined enough nor do I have the time to verify anything published. However my brothers are scientists, one with 2 phds and they both concur with warming effect.
In addition, what harm does investment in solar and wind do? Seems like it is definitely cleaner and healthier and we don’t have to rely on a global supply system.
I respect your opinion, just not sure we agree on how the world should seek to make things run.
One other comment. I have a Volt and my next car will definitely be all electric or one with a longer range. Electric rides so much better and no oil changes. They are better products to me.
In the real world such ideas as "socialism" & "Capitalism", represent the interests of those that stand under these titles, rather than a rational consideration of how social justice, and rational financial governance can increase opportunity for the citizens and the business community to benifit from a steady and sustainable growth that is real and balanced.
The global warming fraud is just one example of how corrupted Western Governance is intentionally destroying national economic security. Digital technology has not increased wealth it has only massively advanced Khazarian Banking Mafia goal of Global Feudalism where these denonic sociopaths and their mercenary whores can destroy the lives billions of decent people with absolute impunity
If that statement is true…”most people don’t like kings…” then why are there still so many monarchies that exist… and there are many around the world …15 under the British monarchy and 28 other sovereign countries have ruling monarchs, currently. People seem so fascinated and enamored with royalty around the world…there are entire publications focused around “The Royals.”🙄. I personally didn’t realize there were so many “royals” still existing…not all ruling,mind you, as they had in times past, but I don’t doubt their influence and lust for that ruling power has left one iota…hence, WEF and all the others in the shadows still pulling and pushing (manipulating) their puppets around the world all jockeying for a better position…the rest of us “be damned”… it’s diabolical!!!!!
This fool Sanders thinks Big Food is lying but Big Pharma is magically telling us the truth about vaccines?
What he doesn't realise - and he should - is that from the 1980s (big tobacco realised they couldn't hide the harms caused by their products any longer) to the early 2000s, major tobacco companies like Philip Morris (now part of Altria Group) and R.J. Reynolds had significant ownership of several prominent food companies, influencing the U.S. food system. They included harmful ingredients that are addictive to this day.
Idiot.
It is not that Sanders believes Big Pharma is telling the truth, rather, Big Pharma is paying Sanders large sums of money to look the other way.
Just can't trust a word he says...
It's babble munble jumbo ...
Bingo!!
I was really expecting Rogan to throw that in and he didn't. Disappointing.
Did you see his interactions with RFK Jr during the confirmation hearings? Bernie will bend like a pretzel to try to stay on the Dem talking points that he has always attacked.
What's wrong with that?
:-O
But seriously, I'm PRO jab...for ALL of them. It could be (STILL) taking out the right people. Or is that mean? I'm still a little bitter...sorry. You might want to look up Mark Crispin Miller for the weekly latest.
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/
'the right people'? Depends on which side you're on?
Not really...the ones that would have been the prison guards circa 1940ish...the Brownshirts screaming, WEAR A MASK and GET VACCINATED or you'll kill <add the list of people here>...the unvaccinated will have a dark winter...that side. Not that I'm bitter.
Team humanity and without deviation.
Capitalists may have fucked EVERYTHING up in the quest for profit maximization,.....but somehow,....when it comes to The Health of The Public.....they draw a fat red line and do everything by the book.
For real 🙄😂
Good journalism. Very cool and, obviously it was a game of wits, and Bernie didn’t have a chance against JR. truth wins every time over deception.
It’s very difficult to argue with a fool. That’s Rogan’s advantage.
You are dumb ans shit
Wasn't a listener of Joe years ago, however his common sense approach is greatly appreciated. He's becoming far more interesting than any msm puppet.
And brave & honest.
Bernie’s handlers made a bad decision to let Bernie spar with Joe Rogan. The liars have been covered by the dishonest media cabal for so long they started to believe their lies were unchallengeable. Whoops! Up pops an intelligent, truthful host asking poignant questions and it’s get me out of here! What would it be like if we had our legacy media doing an honest job of reporting the news and allowing real differences of opinion to be discussed. It would be like the Joe Rogan Show.
If the Democratic Party is a graveyard for progressive mass movements, then shameless Bernie is their mortician.😁
I appreciate a LOT about what you write...HOWEVER, your analysis of Joe Rogan's dialog with Bernie Sanders was AWFUL...it was HYPER-BIASED...and plain-old inaccurate. These two gentleman had a tremendous amount of agreement. Even BEFORE Joe Rogan began to provide a critique of the billionaires who support the Democrats, Bernie ALREADY began to provide this same concern.
It is pathetic how each side SPINS information to one side or another. A lot of us are sick and tired of this. PLease try for more accuracy and objectivity in your reporting. You KNOW how to do this...DO IT!
Well Joe was a Democrat so we know he’s center left but the left went bat shit crazy and went far left and Rogan exposed Bernie as far far left
Come on lefty you on the losing side of all the shit that’s going on in todays world
Boyz in Grils sports really??
They didn’t talk about girls and boys sports. They talked about stuff that affects millions of lives not stuck on bathrooms and sports that applies to a couple hundred people, if that.
Listen to the program before you comment!
Far out - thank you for sharing this, Fox... I did not get to hear this, and am delighted to catch your recap. Qudos :)
Man! Bernie didn’t know he was talking to a very informed man?!?
A former Bernie Bro!
Did Bernie say which of his three homes he'd let The State nationalize to house illegal alien gang members?
Let's keep worshipping corrupt billionaires like Trump and Musk, what a genius plan!
I don't think he was necessarily defending billionaires so much as questioning the reasoning what would enable a corrupt and incompetent government. Rogan seemed to agree that so much consolidated power is a bad thing
Tell us of your solution to get past Trump, Dementia Joe, Hildo and the rest.
The puppets are not the problem, - the puppet masters ARE the problem. "Trump, Dementia Joe, Hildo", etc., are all just puppets and mouthpieces of the "Billionaire Boys Club", - it's THEY who are the "enemy" of WE THE PEOPLE....
Going down that road, it goes even deeper than that - the problem is a We The People who allow it.
So supporting a billionaire is worshiping them? NOT!
What is worse:
A. A billionaire who creates real things and services, provides jobs with healthcare and retirement benefits to support the families of the workers and also provides a tax base, or
B. A multi-millionaire who has become rich solely in politics who has made nothing but complaints, provided only mostly complaints, maybe a few staffing jobs, useless or red-tape legislation, is enriching himself with millions of dollars from lobbyists from Big Pharma and the Climate Grift Scientists and their "Green" companies.
C. A billionaire who uses their money to create organizations that provide money to people like Antifa who want destructive anarchy and only seek to destroy, create chaos, lawlessness, and disorder. (Soros)
Leave your knee-jerk communist-planted hate the rich myths behind and use logic and reasoning. Question Authority and demand accountability from all of them, not just one side.
Gary, you sound like you have a lot of issues. You should however cite your sources that prove Sanders is making money off big pharma. You’re way off base if you think pharmaceuticals are going to support a man who calls for universal health care.
You should take a deep breath and actually listen to the program before commenting.
Who the F is worshipping mere mortal humans?!?! That’s insane!
Rogan is a meathead and a greedy sob who pushes his brand shamelessly. He has done some good interviews but he is not an intellectual--he's an entertainer and comedian.
And when people are unable to stand up to his questioning, what does that tell you about the quality of "professional" journalism?
Rogan has done some excellent interviews. On global warming here he was right on. On vaccines, on US imperialism, etc.. But if he had someone on to expose how private equity and hedge funds are looting the country, his red state Republicans would drop him like a hot potato.
Not at all. I'm one of his Republican listeners. I'm not bothered by his overall leftist views. He's been historically anti-gun. He's honest about his positions. That's all I require. It's more the elected politicians than the populace (for both parties) that like the crony capitalist crap. Support for preventing politicians from profiting from their insider knowledge is probably a 95-5 percent issue among Americans and the reverse among the political class.
I'm willing to bet he would do better than either of us on a test of general knowledge. He's spent years listening to some of the most intelligent informed people in the world. On the other hand, on the issues we care about deeply, he seems ignorant. Three hours of conversation can't replace years of study. Are you really trying to put forward the notion that the hosts on MSDNC or Fox News are intellectuals? Rachel Maddow and Mark Levin (sorry, Sean Hannity is operating with about 30 fewer IQ points than either of them) are both intelligent, but they are performance artists every bit as much as Joe Rogan. They are just less funny and more dishonest.
I don't watch cable TV. Napolitano has excellent interviews of very serious intellects such as John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs, former CIA people, had Nader on a few weeks ago. Lew Rockwell has serious writers.
Good job, Rogan, except for the stupid parts, like, "I'd be willing to pay more taxes. . . " Like a Ponzi scheme, We The People can only take so much.
a rather stupid comment by Rogan. the more money government has, the more fraud, power, corruption and stealing they do.
He forgot the red flag, a/k/a room elephant: We have not just one, rather, we have fifty-one constitutions because our agents cannot be trusted.
That the ones who should be going after those who violate one or more of the constitutions do not, serves as yet more proof even more than the constitutions are needed (e.g., the Declaration of Independence).
Actually nicotine is not addictive. It's the pyrazines added that are addictive. I use nicotine patch 3 mg daily to counter the effects of what's in or transmitted from the covid jabs, at the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor sites found on my cells.. But if I forget it I don't crave it. Also the nightshades have naturally occurring nicotine in them.
It is shocking how public figures who influence many people are ignorant of facts about issues that touch millions (billions?) of lives. Like climate. Regarding such a matter, how can a politician not investigate the issue for himself from a - z to inform himself? The same goes to a man who is very prominent right now, namely Jeffrey Sachs. He knows everything there is to know about US foreign policy, etc etc but attends the same climate briefings as uncle Bernie and believes what he is told. When a story is fantastic, investigate yourself, e.g. covid, climate....
Ignorance is bliss when those behind the issues are handing out donations to politicians and directorships to regulators
I suppose you’re a scientist that REALLY knows the truth about climate. Let’s use a brain cell and guess which side is more financially equipped to do these scientific studies and to publish them. Would that be the billion dollar corporations or the universities? I will treat that rhetorically, So if the universities had made shit up, how come the billion dollar corporations can’t get their “legitimate studies” onto the billion dollar media platforms that they own to castrate the false flags sent out by the university?
Not a climate scientist but a retired researcher, so, I know the research environment well. Just like during covid when doctors who successfully treated their patients were fired, lost their licences, were belittled etc, climate scientists who question the climate hysteria narrative don't receive research funding and/or are let go, etc. That is not how science works. You SHOULD question everything. When you are totally objective the truth puts its hand up and becomes undeniable. 2 brief points: we're now experiencing the coldest climate in 485 million years according to a Washington Post article (!) of 2024-09-19 and we're slowly entering an ice age. We've been in an interglacial period, meaning already in an ice age for millenia. Second, CO2 is an essential, life sustaining gas which is at extremely low levels currently. It's impact on temperatures, as a greenhouse gas is limited and it has already the level where increased CO2 levels cannot further affect climate or temperatures. Kindly visit the CO2coalition.org website and experience a total absence of alarmism, coupled with actual scientific facts, presented by real scientists and supported by real data, not computer models.
Not a climate scientist but a retired researcher, so, I know the research environment well. Just like during covid when doctors who successfully treated their patients were fired, lost their licences, were belittled etc, climate scientists who question the climate hysteria narrative don't receive research funding and/or are let go, etc. That is not how science works. You SHOULD question everything. When you are totally objective the truth puts its hand up and becomes undeniable. 2 brief points: we're now experiencing the coldest climate in 485 million years according to a Washington Post article (!) of 2024-09-19 and we're slowly entering an ice age. We've been in an interglacial period, meaning already in an ice age for millenia. Second, CO2 is an essential, life sustaining gas which is at extremely low levels currently. It's impact on temperatures, as a greenhouse gas is limited and it has already the level where increased CO2 levels cannot further affect climate or temperatures. Kindly visit the CO2coalition.org website and experience a total absence of alarmism, coupled with actual scientific facts, presented by real scientists and supported by real data, not computer models.
I completely agree on challenging everything, particularly on today’s environment. I still am skeptical that big oil can’t fund research to override the science being proffered by most of the world. I am not scientifically inclined enough nor do I have the time to verify anything published. However my brothers are scientists, one with 2 phds and they both concur with warming effect.
In addition, what harm does investment in solar and wind do? Seems like it is definitely cleaner and healthier and we don’t have to rely on a global supply system.
I respect your opinion, just not sure we agree on how the world should seek to make things run.
One other comment. I have a Volt and my next car will definitely be all electric or one with a longer range. Electric rides so much better and no oil changes. They are better products to me.
That.
Was.
Enjoyable!
Absolutely!
In the real world such ideas as "socialism" & "Capitalism", represent the interests of those that stand under these titles, rather than a rational consideration of how social justice, and rational financial governance can increase opportunity for the citizens and the business community to benifit from a steady and sustainable growth that is real and balanced.
The global warming fraud is just one example of how corrupted Western Governance is intentionally destroying national economic security. Digital technology has not increased wealth it has only massively advanced Khazarian Banking Mafia goal of Global Feudalism where these denonic sociopaths and their mercenary whores can destroy the lives billions of decent people with absolute impunity
Socialism is the road to get to Communism.
Communism is a monarchy.
Most people do not like kings, so the concept must be normalized (through socialism).
If that statement is true…”most people don’t like kings…” then why are there still so many monarchies that exist… and there are many around the world …15 under the British monarchy and 28 other sovereign countries have ruling monarchs, currently. People seem so fascinated and enamored with royalty around the world…there are entire publications focused around “The Royals.”🙄. I personally didn’t realize there were so many “royals” still existing…not all ruling,mind you, as they had in times past, but I don’t doubt their influence and lust for that ruling power has left one iota…hence, WEF and all the others in the shadows still pulling and pushing (manipulating) their puppets around the world all jockeying for a better position…the rest of us “be damned”… it’s diabolical!!!!!
Brainwashed and people don't know there is an other way.