Is Dr. Malone calling for the end of the MRNA jabs? Is Dr. Malone calling for the prosecution of the bastards that implemented the covid killing spree?
No one paid me for my comment regarding him being a fraud. His wife wrote a hit piece on me for daring to question the efficacy of vaccines. He is all about his own glory and wealth.
I appreciate the discussion, but it’s clear we’re coming from very different perspectives, and I don’t think any of us is going to change the other’s mind. I’m going to step out of this conversation. I respect that everyone has the right to their own views, and I’ll leave it there. Good night everyone 😊
No he's not calling for that and nor should he. It was POTUS Trump through OWS that implemented the role shots. He got the shots authorized for injection into humans before Biden took over. They were experimental and considered fit only for use on laboratory animals until PITUS Trump got them reclassified as suitable for injection into Americans.
And it's a good thing redid. It is reducing the population of Americans and that is good for the planet because fewer Americans will mean fewer forever wars by Americans butchering kids in far off lands through trying to be the world's police.
Just to be clear, the COVID vaccines were authorized through established regulatory processes, not at the whim of any president. They were tested in humans in large clinical trials before approval, and their main purpose has been to prevent severe illness and death, not population control. I personally did not get vaccinated due to my beliefs, as others chose as well, but that’s besides the point. Spreading claims like this is misleading and dangerous, and it distracts from real discussions about public health and policy.
No, the Covid vaccines were produced and 'tested' by BARDA under a military contract. It was NOT 'tested' in 'large clinical trials'. The Epstein files clarifies that it was in fact a military operation (Warp speed) with the intent to kill, sterilize and sicken.
The vaccines went through multiple phases of clinical trials with tens of thousands of participants before emergency use authorization, following standard scientific protocols. Operation Warp Speed was a funding and logistics program to accelerate development and distribution—it did not bypass safety requirements. Claims that the intent was to harm people are conspiracy theories, not evidence. The overwhelming real-world data show the vaccines reduced severe illness, hospitalization, and death for millions. My personal choice not to vaccinate was based on my own health and immunity, not fear of harm, and that does not change the documented benefits for others.
Mistakes will happen but when they are consistently in the "wrong" direction you have to consider intentionality. Following the Lack of science during the Covid19 panic:
Dr Yeadon, whistleblower ex-VP of Pfizer confirms much of the following here.
0. Event 201, an exercise simulating a SARS virus outbreak, was held a couple months before COVID-19 broke out. Widespread censorship of the media was recommended to combat vaccine hesitancy and nothing recommended to improve basic health and immunity.
1. A pandemic was declared on very little evidence of one in late 2019.
2. Dr Fauci, Dr Baric and others were caught providing funding and technology to Wuhan Lab to perform gain of function on coronaviruses, then lying about it and crushing any scientific discussion of the issue. Ft Detrick biolab was also involved in GOF research that may have leaked. Dr David Martin claims the pathogens were patented long before 2019..
3. A PCR test which is not meant for the purpose of diagnosis according to its inventor, was used to diagnose Covid-19.
4. There was a panic of excess testing with a PCR test protocol that had very high false positives; including testing people who didnt even have respiratory disease symptoms.
5. Declaring Covid-19 the cause of death in old patients with multiple serious comorbidities most notably in the early days in Italy, but elsewhere as well, without any autopsies.
6. Locking people down and masking them up in a "novel" approach to epidemic management. This caused serious systemic social and health problems. Masking was never shown to be effective. Only quarantining the sick and susceptible would have been textbook rational.
7. Panicking the population with steadily mounting gross mortality statistics that were actually low for most demographic groups, except the susceptible.
8. Improper management of nursing home populations that led to more deaths; 50% of the US deaths were in nursing homes.
9. Telling the public not to seek hospital treatment until the disease was far advanced, i.e. their lips turned blue. Another "novel" approach to health care, unheard of for other diseases.
10. Preventing doctors who were treating patients with early symptoms from using protocols and drugs that they thought were effective based on experience and many studies (ttps://c19early.org/). That made possible Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) for vaccines and other poorly tested measures.
11. Hospital protocols were inappropriate including using intubation with ventilators, and drugs like remdesivir and others that were murderous. Intubation is dangerous particularly used by staff mostly untrained in respiratory therapy. Covid patients didnt have trouble breathing. They had trouble absorbing oxygen for which supplemental oxygen is indicated, not ventilators.
12. In the USA hospitals were financially incentivized to diagnose patients with Covid, which is hardly a scientific way to manage a disease, but a great way to gin up a "pandemic".
13. Rolling out mRNA shots under the EUA with short clinical trials using an untested platform. Then terminating the trials at 6 months when they started to show negative effectiveness; also so that long term effects couldnt be determined. Mandating the shots claimed to have high Relative Risk Reduction when the Absolute Risk Reduction was extremely low.
14. Lying to the regulators about the effectiveness and safety of the Covid shots to get them approved under the EUA. More died in the “vaccinated" arm of the Pfizer trial but were attributed to causes unrelated to the shots, without proof.
15.Claiming initially to the public that the shots prevented transmission, then finally admitting that was a lie. Claiming the injected lipid nano particles stayed localized at the injection site and were eliminated rapidly. They knew that was a lie and they have been found in all major organ systems including the brain and reproductive organs, months to years after the shots. Claiming the shots were safe and effective, knowing all the harms they caused notably inflammation including myocarditis.
16. Claiming that with the PREP Act those injured by the shots could get compensation when almost none has been given. Anyone associated with the gross malfeasance of the shots was given immunity by PREP.
17. According to Sasha Latypova this whole program was run from the US Defense Dept with the FDA, CDC, Moderna and Pfizer just pretty faces on the scam. The DoD had no legal obligation to make safe and effective shots.
18. The gift that keeps on giving. Health officials are ignoring or misattributing the large increase in excess mortality and morbidity that started with the rollout of the Covid shots and continues. Menstruation has been disrupted, fertility has been reduced, and child mortality has increased because of these shots. Cancer rates, especially in younger individuals, have increased following mRNA injections.
And then at the end of the day no responsibility has been taken by those accountable for following this Lack of science. Read about it in, The Pfizer Papers, edited by Dr Naomi Wolf.
Here's an education for you: an MD/PhD details "The Pfizer Job: How Pfizer carried out the biggest pharma trial heist ever -- and the regulators swallowed it hook, line and sinker"
They were not properly tested, it normally takes 7 years. Strange that in Britain the first year deaths were people average age 84 and with other illneses. When mRNA started, much younger people died, mostly men. In a Swiss study 1 in 35 got inflammation of the heart after a booster. They were told to rest, no exercise, it lasted a few months. Playing a sport would have killed them.
Population control was certainly the main goal of the poison shot! On the Georgia Guidestone which was (its been destroyed) the calling card of the New World Order people, it stated a goal to maintain the worlds population at 500 million! A much smaller population is easier to control. How then to reduce the population to the target number? Create a "pandemic", hype the fear and get billions of sheeple to take the Kool Aid. Its a brilliant, evil plan and time will show how effective it is. Early on we saw it showed how toxic and deadly it is. Give it time to do its work!
These claims are conspiracy theory, not fact. COVID vaccines were developed to prevent severe illness, hospitalization, and death—not to control populations. Millions of people worldwide have benefited from them, and independent monitoring continues to show their safety. Linking unrelated symbols or destroyed monuments to public health measures is misleading and distracts from real discussions about protecting lives.
I’m not being naive—I’m looking at the evidence. COVID vaccines were tested in large trials and monitored continuously, showing they reduce severe illness, hospitalization, and death. I personally chose not to take the vaccine because I felt my health and immunity were fine, and that was my decision. Claiming the vaccines are “poison” ignores the real-world data showing the benefits for millions of people. I respect your right to your beliefs, but spreading fear like this isn’t protecting anyone.
mRNA is not a vaccine, it is a cellular treatment, a Pfizer executive admitted it. Another told the European Commission enquiry they didn't know if mRNA would stop infection or transmission.
Remember the propaganda, "95% effective"? From beginning to end this has been a psyop.
They were tested in large clinical trials but the publicized results were manipulated. More deaths in the vaxed group, written off as unrelated to the vax without evidence. Healthy 12 yr old girl, De Garay, was paralyzed and reported to the FDA as a stomach complaint. After 6 mos, there was negative efficacy so they terminated the trials prematurely, and vaxd all the control subjects to hide the long term damages. The purpose of preventing severe illness was concocted after the vax was found to be ineffective at preventing the disease (they were going at "the speed of science"), which was supposedly their initial purpose.
Clinical trials are closely monitored by independent regulators, and adverse events are tracked and investigated. Individual cases, while tragic, don’t negate the overwhelming evidence that the vaccines significantly reduced severe illness, hospitalization, and death across millions of people. The goal was never just to prevent infection entirely—no vaccine is 100 percent effective at that—but to reduce harm, which the data consistently show. Claims of widespread manipulation ignore the scale and transparency of global studies and reporting systems.
I recommend you get out of the mainstream narrative bubble and read Pfizer Papers, Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity by Dr Naomi Klein based on the work of thousands of scientists analyzing Pfizer’s 100’s of thousand of pages on the Covid vacs trials that had to be FOIA-ed from the FDA. As delaying tactic they tried to spread their release over 75 years.
Cause Unknown by Ed Dowd
What the Nurses Saw, by McCarthy
The Covid Code, by Zowe Smith
The Courage to Face Covid-19, by Dr McCullough
The Wuhan Coverup, and The Real Anthony Fauci by RFKjr
Thanks for the reading list, but citing books—many of which are written by people with clear agendas—doesn’t change the real-world evidence. Tens of millions of people were protected from severe illness, hospitalization, and death by the COVID vaccines. That’s what matters, and it’s what the data show, not anecdotal stories or selective interpretations.
Aww sweetie, I just feel like saying, thou dost protest too much. Keep trying to convince yourself about that "reduce harm" bs. Time will tell. The whole3 years, or however long it was, was an exercise in harm. People will never trust the medical community again. In the back of everyone's mind will be, "are they really telling the truth". They aren't and I work in this industry.
Also and importantly to help alleviate your ignorance, the clinical trial protocol document linked below is evidence that Pfizer *anticipated* that people coming into contact with the study participants (the ones receiving the Pfizer "vaccines") either via “inhalation or skin contact” might exhibit SAEs (serious adverse events) or AEs (adverse events). And that is *exactly* what is happening now, with thousands of women around the world (who did NOT take the "vaccine") reporting adverse effects with the menstrual cycles (severe bleeding, clotting, cramps, miscarriages, starting bleeding again after many years of no periods due to menopause, etc.) from coming into contact with those who received the mRNA “vaccine".
Save this to your hard drive, and read section 10.4.1, (pages 132 to 133), where it states, and I quote:
"Male participants are eligible to participate [in the study, where they would receive the Pfizer Covid "vaccines"] if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention [the "vaccines"], which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s)."
READ that part and what follows, as men receiving the jabs are then told to REFRAIN from having sex with a "female of childbearing potential.”
Got that?! How many men taking the Covid jab have been warned not to have sex "for at least 28 days" after their 2nd Covid jab? According to this Pfizer document, anyone not knowing about that warning has potential to cause "reproductive safety risk”.
Also be sure to read sections 8.3.5.1 to 8.3.5.3 (pages 67 to 69) -- Pfizer anticipated what is now being referred to as "shedding" of the vaccine contents from the vaxxed to the unvaxxed. How can anyone pushing this dangerous jab claim that the public had "informed consent"? The public were not informed of this reproductive risk.
Yeah, we all need to trust our 62 billion in fraud fines, Big Pharmas! Just because their Godless iatrogenic "medicine" kills 250,000 to 900,000 each year, that's no reason not to trust them, Right???
The "independent" regulator monitoring the vaccine trial, PAID by Pfizer told Pfizer that Maddy De Garay only had stomach pains. She has been wheelchair bound fed through a feeding tube since 2020. Her problems began the day after the first shot. Look her up. Its heart breaking.
You can guarantee that someone wont see something when their paycheck depends on them not seeing it.
As someone with a B.Comm and MBA in finance and marketing.you are scientifically illiterate and it shows but you also exhibit deficits in critical reasoning.
Your comments remind me of Anthony Fauci, as described by Scott Sturman, M.D. The description closely resembles Theodore Millon's "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features."
Anthony Fauci: Failed General
- Scott Sturman, M.D.
"The mindset of Field Marshal Douglas Haig, World War I’s worst general, springs to mind, when drawing a comparison to Anthony Fauci.
By some historical accounts Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig bears the distinction of WWI’s worst general. He rose to Commander of British Expeditionary Forces and led Allied armies during the slaughter and futility at the battles of the Somme and Passchendaele. Known for his self confidence and inflexibility, he repeatedly ordered soldiers over the top to “no man’s land” and into the path of German machine guns. No number of casualties or unachieved objectives could dissuade him from his singular approach to combat.
Nigel Davies, historian and educator, points out that General Haig was emblematic of the chateau general - dictating and directing but far removed from the battlefield:
They were Chateau Generals in approach and in attitude. They drew lines on maps without adequately considering the terrain, issued impossible instructions without looking at the state of the ground, and ran completely inadequate communications that were far from capable of keeping track of, or controlling, a modern battlefield.
In a similar respect, despite his academic and professional accomplishments, Dr. Anthony Fauci has no background or experience in clinical medicine and is ill equipped to lead the SARS-CoV-2 response. His purview is that of a research scientist and entrenched bureaucrat, who is far removed from patient contact.
His career is enmeshed with the pharmaceutical industry, whose financial ties with federal medical regulatory institutions are well described. Throughout his career he has denied patients easily accessible, inexpensive, and effective treatments in lieu of patented medications with high risk profiles and of dubious efficacy. In 1987 despite overwhelming clinical evidence, he told AIDS activists that the prophylactic use of the common antibiotic Bactrim to treat pneumocystis carnii pneumonia was ineffective and possibly dangerous. Through private donations the company Lymphomed circumvented the NIAID and conducted successful clinical trials. The delay cost the lives of nearly 17,000 immunocompromised patients."
My degrees are in business, not medicine, and I’ve never claimed otherwise. That doesn’t mean I need to accept insults or pretend your argument is stronger because you delivered it with condescension.
I made a personal decision not to vaccinate because I felt my health and immunity were fine. That’s my choice. It also doesn’t change the broader evidence that vaccines reduced severe illness and death for many people.
If you want a real discussion, drop the personal attacks. If not, I’m not interested in continuing this.
Just as Godless Prussian model educated kids in Nazi Germany believed in Hitler and Jew killing, so Godless mindless kids of today can be made to feel/ not think!
My post was sardonic. The reality is that the shots prevented severe illness, hospitalization, ICU admission and death. This Vigilant Fox article's claims about damage to women's reproductive hewlth and shedding are bunkum. Although you were not prepared to receive the "protection" conferred by the mRNA shots for which the benefits outweighed the risks for yourself, because of your unspecified "beliefs," it's your contention that others should reap these benefits that you yourself were not prepared to. The shots had long been found to be safe for injection into humans and underwent rigorous long term evaluation prior to the authorization for injection into humans. POTUS trump is correct in his assertion that the shots have saved millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of lives.
First of all, that is NOT what they initially claimed. And even if that were true (it is not) it is NOT a justification to break the Nuremberg Code and coerce or even entice (Krispy Kreme donuts) people to get it. No one coerces people to eat healthy or exercise. That is an individual decision. Remember, we all have separate bodies and souls. We are not one mass, owned and managed by the government.
agree that people have the right to make their own health decisions. No one should be forced to take a vaccine. My point is simply that the COVID vaccines, when chosen, were shown in real-world data to reduce severe illness, hospitalization, and death. Public health recommendations don’t take away individual choice—they provide information so people can make informed decisions.
@ Kim: Wrong again! NO DBPC long term studey has EVER been done on any so-called vaccine from our multi billions in Fraud fines Big Pharmas! I.e. all facts you could look up if?
I get that your post was sardonic, and I agree the vaccines helped prevent severe illness and death for many. My point wasn’t to deny that or to tell others what to do—I just wanted to clarify that my choice not to get vaccinated was personal, based on my own beliefs. The benefits for those who chose the shots are clear, and I respect that, but that choice was always mine to make.
"Vaccines" are not meant to help prevent severe illness or death.They are designed to make money and harm humans. The human race has survived for a very long time before "vaccines" were invented. The ingredients of all "vaccines" are toxic-do the research. A natural immune system if kept healthy and strong does not need any chemical assistance.In fact "vaccines" weaken the immune system and that is what they are intended to do! But society has been trained to trust these poisons.Time people stop being sheep!
Vaccines are designed to train the immune system to recognize and fight specific pathogens safely—not to harm people or make money at the expense of health. Scientific evidence from decades of research shows they prevent severe illness, hospitalization, and death for many diseases, including COVID-19. A healthy immune system is important, but it cannot reliably protect against every new or deadly pathogen on its own. Spreading claims that vaccines are poisonous or intentionally harmful ignores overwhelming data and endangers public health.
Kim, you seem very sure of yourself so I assume you have a background in epidemiology or rigorous scientific research methodology criticism and perhaps philosophy of science.
It would be good if you could rebut the methodological critique in this paper, one of potentially thousands that are critical of the methodology that has been used to assert that the "vaccines" saved lives.
"The Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters against Severe Illness and Death: Scientific Fact or Wishful Myth?”
by Yaakov Ophir, Yaffa Shir-Raz, others — co-authored with Peter McCullough
I’m not a professional epidemiologist, nor am I here to adjudicate every critique of vaccine modeling. What I do know is that the vaccines underwent large-scale clinical trials and ongoing real-world observational studies, showing clear reductions in severe illness, ICU admission, and death. Yes, models make assumptions, and yes, observational studies are not the same as controlled trials—but that does not erase the consistent patterns seen globally. Claims that the vaccines “saved millions” are shorthand for these observable benefits. Arguing over philosophical nuances of modeling does not change the fact that COVID vaccines substantially reduced harm for countless people. My personal choice not to vaccinate was exactly that—personal—and I do not claim it negates the clear public health impact the shots had.
TDS is strong. And it is almost hilarious to think that a Dem president would not have done the same thing, albeit with much less bombast. Fauci was hovering above this no matter who was president.
Yes. It tells me that this whole thing is bipartisan. And worldwide.
Also, as I have said elsewhere, folks who love that jab do not care or even find interesting the number of deaths and harms caused by the jab will continue to drone on about the totally unproveable meme that millions or billions or even trillions of lives were saved. Blaming Trump is just more TDS. And purposely, IMO, clouds the issue. Biden formed his very own little Covid team the summer before the election. Gates et al. were in charge of everything. Personally, that summer the whole enterprise seemed skeevy to me, not that anything scientific was available, so I said nope from the start. And no matter who was president, given the state of the lying media, I cannot imagine taking the word of a president about anything medical. or anything at all, come to think of it.
I think Dr Naomi Wolf called this out first. And in the book she edited, called The Pfizer Papers, that summarizes the work of over 3,000 volunteer independent scientists who read the Pfizer vax data FOIA-ed from the FDA by ICAN (icandecide.org), it makes it clear that the primary focus of Pfizer was NOT on respiratory disease, but the vaccine's effects on reproduction!! These are first order criminals.
While I appreciate that he warned about the harm to women, overall Robert Malone is a fraud. Everything he does is for himself. He attacks TRUE freedom fighters like Sasha Latipova, and his wife wrote a hit piece on me for daring to question the efficacy of vaccines. Don't trust him.
Naomi Wolfe and her team have the most thorough coverage of this in their research of the book, The Pfizer Papers. The courts forced Pfizer to release the info that Pfizer had and wanted “sealed”/hidden for 50+ years. It took a volunteer team of medical legal and research professionals to comb through it and organize it. Pfizer had the information and hid it until they were forced to release it.
It's all self assembling nano technology. What used to be commonly called nanobots. 25 years ago we learned of a future of nanobots where cancer cures cost pennies because the stuff makes itself. Where unheard of alloys and materials were possible because this stuff 3D prints atoms and molecules. It was all mainstream stuff. I read in Wired magazine.
Now they pretend they don't know what's happening, and changed the name to "exosomes". But when you watch it make nano sized motherboards and chips, you know it's not a life form that is supposed to exist. It's machines, computers, crypto. It's nanobots on your nads and ovaries. And your brain. Everybody has bots on the brain now.
Gee, if we wisards can overlook 60 years of massive fraud and millions of iatrogenic deaths from our Godless, corrupt Big Pharma "medicine," we deserve to be killed and scammed, like sheep to the slaughter house! Only God/ "Our Creator" can save us now
Yup, prolonged periods, excessive bleeding, rashes, shingles, tinnitus, heart palpitations, blotchy red skin, headaches, eye issues, all since 2021 and no jabs???????
I’m also disturbed by your recommendation of Midwestern Doctors Substack. He has been attacking Dr William Makis who is a true hero saving cancer patients without charging them ridiculous amounts of money.
Worst yet…for those Leftees who never believed us…your own Party of Progressive communists did IT TO YOU….and you thought you might have kids….not really…the Gates desires anti-human vac got you too!
I believe in the shedding theory. I received the first shots in April 2021 but none afterwards. Still, I set about doing a spike protein detox for our family starting over a year ago. I often wonder if I still can shed or not, or if I have any spike protein still in me. I’ve done the detox protocol for about 13 months straight. I’ve had my husband do two rounds of 4-5 months each. Wish there were a way to know …
You mention one theory about exosomes. You could also mention another theory advanced by Dr Bryan Ardis with plenty of published support: that the mrna vaccine, as well as Covid infection without an injection, infects not only human cells but also bacterial cells within the gut microbiome, creating a reservoir of infected cells that are outside of the body's regular immune response; and that such infection hijacks the cell's machinery to continually produce a synthesized venom. The venom damages the body and is expelled any way the body is able- respiration, fecal, sweat, etc. This theory allows for shedding and for the common recurrence of symptoms called Long Covid. The best proof of his theory is that the cure he proposes - nicotine patches - actually works both as a prophylactic and as a cure.
Is Dr. Malone calling for the end of the MRNA jabs? Is Dr. Malone calling for the prosecution of the bastards that implemented the covid killing spree?
Malone was never on the side of the truth and the facts. He is covering his ___. He was part and parcel of the entire psyop.
Who paid you to say that nonsense?
No one paid me for my comment regarding him being a fraud. His wife wrote a hit piece on me for daring to question the efficacy of vaccines. He is all about his own glory and wealth.
Yes! The inventor of MRNA now says “OOPS?”🤬
Now I see why you are so adamant about these vaccines!
EGO is a killer isn't it
Ego?
You three sound like The Three Stuges!
Yes, he called for end of mRNA jabs a long time ago.
I appreciate the discussion, but it’s clear we’re coming from very different perspectives, and I don’t think any of us is going to change the other’s mind. I’m going to step out of this conversation. I respect that everyone has the right to their own views, and I’ll leave it there. Good night everyone 😊
But remember Kim, "The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in a period of moral crisis, maintain their neutrality."
Nope…
No he's not calling for that and nor should he. It was POTUS Trump through OWS that implemented the role shots. He got the shots authorized for injection into humans before Biden took over. They were experimental and considered fit only for use on laboratory animals until PITUS Trump got them reclassified as suitable for injection into Americans.
And it's a good thing redid. It is reducing the population of Americans and that is good for the planet because fewer Americans will mean fewer forever wars by Americans butchering kids in far off lands through trying to be the world's police.
Just to be clear, the COVID vaccines were authorized through established regulatory processes, not at the whim of any president. They were tested in humans in large clinical trials before approval, and their main purpose has been to prevent severe illness and death, not population control. I personally did not get vaccinated due to my beliefs, as others chose as well, but that’s besides the point. Spreading claims like this is misleading and dangerous, and it distracts from real discussions about public health and policy.
No, the Covid vaccines were produced and 'tested' by BARDA under a military contract. It was NOT 'tested' in 'large clinical trials'. The Epstein files clarifies that it was in fact a military operation (Warp speed) with the intent to kill, sterilize and sicken.
The vaccines went through multiple phases of clinical trials with tens of thousands of participants before emergency use authorization, following standard scientific protocols. Operation Warp Speed was a funding and logistics program to accelerate development and distribution—it did not bypass safety requirements. Claims that the intent was to harm people are conspiracy theories, not evidence. The overwhelming real-world data show the vaccines reduced severe illness, hospitalization, and death for millions. My personal choice not to vaccinate was based on my own health and immunity, not fear of harm, and that does not change the documented benefits for others.
Mistakes will happen but when they are consistently in the "wrong" direction you have to consider intentionality. Following the Lack of science during the Covid19 panic:
https://substack.com/@stopthoseshots/note/c-177507037?r=3ahdk&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Dr Yeadon, whistleblower ex-VP of Pfizer confirms much of the following here.
0. Event 201, an exercise simulating a SARS virus outbreak, was held a couple months before COVID-19 broke out. Widespread censorship of the media was recommended to combat vaccine hesitancy and nothing recommended to improve basic health and immunity.
1. A pandemic was declared on very little evidence of one in late 2019.
2. Dr Fauci, Dr Baric and others were caught providing funding and technology to Wuhan Lab to perform gain of function on coronaviruses, then lying about it and crushing any scientific discussion of the issue. Ft Detrick biolab was also involved in GOF research that may have leaked. Dr David Martin claims the pathogens were patented long before 2019..
3. A PCR test which is not meant for the purpose of diagnosis according to its inventor, was used to diagnose Covid-19.
4. There was a panic of excess testing with a PCR test protocol that had very high false positives; including testing people who didnt even have respiratory disease symptoms.
5. Declaring Covid-19 the cause of death in old patients with multiple serious comorbidities most notably in the early days in Italy, but elsewhere as well, without any autopsies.
6. Locking people down and masking them up in a "novel" approach to epidemic management. This caused serious systemic social and health problems. Masking was never shown to be effective. Only quarantining the sick and susceptible would have been textbook rational.
7. Panicking the population with steadily mounting gross mortality statistics that were actually low for most demographic groups, except the susceptible.
8. Improper management of nursing home populations that led to more deaths; 50% of the US deaths were in nursing homes.
9. Telling the public not to seek hospital treatment until the disease was far advanced, i.e. their lips turned blue. Another "novel" approach to health care, unheard of for other diseases.
10. Preventing doctors who were treating patients with early symptoms from using protocols and drugs that they thought were effective based on experience and many studies (ttps://c19early.org/). That made possible Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) for vaccines and other poorly tested measures.
11. Hospital protocols were inappropriate including using intubation with ventilators, and drugs like remdesivir and others that were murderous. Intubation is dangerous particularly used by staff mostly untrained in respiratory therapy. Covid patients didnt have trouble breathing. They had trouble absorbing oxygen for which supplemental oxygen is indicated, not ventilators.
12. In the USA hospitals were financially incentivized to diagnose patients with Covid, which is hardly a scientific way to manage a disease, but a great way to gin up a "pandemic".
13. Rolling out mRNA shots under the EUA with short clinical trials using an untested platform. Then terminating the trials at 6 months when they started to show negative effectiveness; also so that long term effects couldnt be determined. Mandating the shots claimed to have high Relative Risk Reduction when the Absolute Risk Reduction was extremely low.
14. Lying to the regulators about the effectiveness and safety of the Covid shots to get them approved under the EUA. More died in the “vaccinated" arm of the Pfizer trial but were attributed to causes unrelated to the shots, without proof.
15.Claiming initially to the public that the shots prevented transmission, then finally admitting that was a lie. Claiming the injected lipid nano particles stayed localized at the injection site and were eliminated rapidly. They knew that was a lie and they have been found in all major organ systems including the brain and reproductive organs, months to years after the shots. Claiming the shots were safe and effective, knowing all the harms they caused notably inflammation including myocarditis.
16. Claiming that with the PREP Act those injured by the shots could get compensation when almost none has been given. Anyone associated with the gross malfeasance of the shots was given immunity by PREP.
17. According to Sasha Latypova this whole program was run from the US Defense Dept with the FDA, CDC, Moderna and Pfizer just pretty faces on the scam. The DoD had no legal obligation to make safe and effective shots.
18. The gift that keeps on giving. Health officials are ignoring or misattributing the large increase in excess mortality and morbidity that started with the rollout of the Covid shots and continues. Menstruation has been disrupted, fertility has been reduced, and child mortality has increased because of these shots. Cancer rates, especially in younger individuals, have increased following mRNA injections.
And then at the end of the day no responsibility has been taken by those accountable for following this Lack of science. Read about it in, The Pfizer Papers, edited by Dr Naomi Wolf.
Here's an education for you: an MD/PhD details "The Pfizer Job: How Pfizer carried out the biggest pharma trial heist ever -- and the regulators swallowed it hook, line and sinker"
https://www.arkmedic.info/p/the-pfizer-job
They were not properly tested, it normally takes 7 years. Strange that in Britain the first year deaths were people average age 84 and with other illneses. When mRNA started, much younger people died, mostly men. In a Swiss study 1 in 35 got inflammation of the heart after a booster. They were told to rest, no exercise, it lasted a few months. Playing a sport would have killed them.
Population control was certainly the main goal of the poison shot! On the Georgia Guidestone which was (its been destroyed) the calling card of the New World Order people, it stated a goal to maintain the worlds population at 500 million! A much smaller population is easier to control. How then to reduce the population to the target number? Create a "pandemic", hype the fear and get billions of sheeple to take the Kool Aid. Its a brilliant, evil plan and time will show how effective it is. Early on we saw it showed how toxic and deadly it is. Give it time to do its work!
These claims are conspiracy theory, not fact. COVID vaccines were developed to prevent severe illness, hospitalization, and death—not to control populations. Millions of people worldwide have benefited from them, and independent monitoring continues to show their safety. Linking unrelated symbols or destroyed monuments to public health measures is misleading and distracts from real discussions about protecting lives.
Sorry, but you are amazingly naive. The way to 'protect lives' is to STOP POISONING US.
I’m not being naive—I’m looking at the evidence. COVID vaccines were tested in large trials and monitored continuously, showing they reduce severe illness, hospitalization, and death. I personally chose not to take the vaccine because I felt my health and immunity were fine, and that was my decision. Claiming the vaccines are “poison” ignores the real-world data showing the benefits for millions of people. I respect your right to your beliefs, but spreading fear like this isn’t protecting anyone.
mRNA is not a vaccine, it is a cellular treatment, a Pfizer executive admitted it. Another told the European Commission enquiry they didn't know if mRNA would stop infection or transmission.
These are pretend. Marketing points. Not real facts.
Remember the propaganda, "95% effective"? From beginning to end this has been a psyop.
They were tested in large clinical trials but the publicized results were manipulated. More deaths in the vaxed group, written off as unrelated to the vax without evidence. Healthy 12 yr old girl, De Garay, was paralyzed and reported to the FDA as a stomach complaint. After 6 mos, there was negative efficacy so they terminated the trials prematurely, and vaxd all the control subjects to hide the long term damages. The purpose of preventing severe illness was concocted after the vax was found to be ineffective at preventing the disease (they were going at "the speed of science"), which was supposedly their initial purpose.
Clinical trials are closely monitored by independent regulators, and adverse events are tracked and investigated. Individual cases, while tragic, don’t negate the overwhelming evidence that the vaccines significantly reduced severe illness, hospitalization, and death across millions of people. The goal was never just to prevent infection entirely—no vaccine is 100 percent effective at that—but to reduce harm, which the data consistently show. Claims of widespread manipulation ignore the scale and transparency of global studies and reporting systems.
I recommend you get out of the mainstream narrative bubble and read Pfizer Papers, Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity by Dr Naomi Klein based on the work of thousands of scientists analyzing Pfizer’s 100’s of thousand of pages on the Covid vacs trials that had to be FOIA-ed from the FDA. As delaying tactic they tried to spread their release over 75 years.
Cause Unknown by Ed Dowd
What the Nurses Saw, by McCarthy
The Covid Code, by Zowe Smith
The Courage to Face Covid-19, by Dr McCullough
The Wuhan Coverup, and The Real Anthony Fauci by RFKjr
Lies My Govt Told Me by Dr Malone
The Truth About Wuhan by Huff
The War on Ivermectin by Dr Kory
That should get you started.
Thanks for the reading list, but citing books—many of which are written by people with clear agendas—doesn’t change the real-world evidence. Tens of millions of people were protected from severe illness, hospitalization, and death by the COVID vaccines. That’s what matters, and it’s what the data show, not anecdotal stories or selective interpretations.
Aww sweetie, I just feel like saying, thou dost protest too much. Keep trying to convince yourself about that "reduce harm" bs. Time will tell. The whole3 years, or however long it was, was an exercise in harm. People will never trust the medical community again. In the back of everyone's mind will be, "are they really telling the truth". They aren't and I work in this industry.
@ Vanessa: Do you think that the $62 Billion+ [with a B] in FRAUD fines Pharma's could have something to do with your distrust?
You REALLY need to read this expose regarding the clinical trials: https://www.arkmedic.info/p/the-pfizer-job
Also and importantly to help alleviate your ignorance, the clinical trial protocol document linked below is evidence that Pfizer *anticipated* that people coming into contact with the study participants (the ones receiving the Pfizer "vaccines") either via “inhalation or skin contact” might exhibit SAEs (serious adverse events) or AEs (adverse events). And that is *exactly* what is happening now, with thousands of women around the world (who did NOT take the "vaccine") reporting adverse effects with the menstrual cycles (severe bleeding, clotting, cramps, miscarriages, starting bleeding again after many years of no periods due to menopause, etc.) from coming into contact with those who received the mRNA “vaccine".
Save this to your hard drive, and read section 10.4.1, (pages 132 to 133), where it states, and I quote:
"Male participants are eligible to participate [in the study, where they would receive the Pfizer Covid "vaccines"] if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention [the "vaccines"], which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s)."
READ that part and what follows, as men receiving the jabs are then told to REFRAIN from having sex with a "female of childbearing potential.”
Got that?! How many men taking the Covid jab have been warned not to have sex "for at least 28 days" after their 2nd Covid jab? According to this Pfizer document, anyone not knowing about that warning has potential to cause "reproductive safety risk”.
Also be sure to read sections 8.3.5.1 to 8.3.5.3 (pages 67 to 69) -- Pfizer anticipated what is now being referred to as "shedding" of the vaccine contents from the vaxxed to the unvaxxed. How can anyone pushing this dangerous jab claim that the public had "informed consent"? The public were not informed of this reproductive risk.
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf
Yeah, we all need to trust our 62 billion in fraud fines, Big Pharmas! Just because their Godless iatrogenic "medicine" kills 250,000 to 900,000 each year, that's no reason not to trust them, Right???
The "independent" regulator monitoring the vaccine trial, PAID by Pfizer told Pfizer that Maddy De Garay only had stomach pains. She has been wheelchair bound fed through a feeding tube since 2020. Her problems began the day after the first shot. Look her up. Its heart breaking.
You can guarantee that someone wont see something when their paycheck depends on them not seeing it.
As someone with a B.Comm and MBA in finance and marketing.you are scientifically illiterate and it shows but you also exhibit deficits in critical reasoning.
Your comments remind me of Anthony Fauci, as described by Scott Sturman, M.D. The description closely resembles Theodore Millon's "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features."
Anthony Fauci: Failed General
- Scott Sturman, M.D.
"The mindset of Field Marshal Douglas Haig, World War I’s worst general, springs to mind, when drawing a comparison to Anthony Fauci.
By some historical accounts Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig bears the distinction of WWI’s worst general. He rose to Commander of British Expeditionary Forces and led Allied armies during the slaughter and futility at the battles of the Somme and Passchendaele. Known for his self confidence and inflexibility, he repeatedly ordered soldiers over the top to “no man’s land” and into the path of German machine guns. No number of casualties or unachieved objectives could dissuade him from his singular approach to combat.
Nigel Davies, historian and educator, points out that General Haig was emblematic of the chateau general - dictating and directing but far removed from the battlefield:
They were Chateau Generals in approach and in attitude. They drew lines on maps without adequately considering the terrain, issued impossible instructions without looking at the state of the ground, and ran completely inadequate communications that were far from capable of keeping track of, or controlling, a modern battlefield.
In a similar respect, despite his academic and professional accomplishments, Dr. Anthony Fauci has no background or experience in clinical medicine and is ill equipped to lead the SARS-CoV-2 response. His purview is that of a research scientist and entrenched bureaucrat, who is far removed from patient contact.
His career is enmeshed with the pharmaceutical industry, whose financial ties with federal medical regulatory institutions are well described. Throughout his career he has denied patients easily accessible, inexpensive, and effective treatments in lieu of patented medications with high risk profiles and of dubious efficacy. In 1987 despite overwhelming clinical evidence, he told AIDS activists that the prophylactic use of the common antibiotic Bactrim to treat pneumocystis carnii pneumonia was ineffective and possibly dangerous. Through private donations the company Lymphomed circumvented the NIAID and conducted successful clinical trials. The delay cost the lives of nearly 17,000 immunocompromised patients."
My degrees are in business, not medicine, and I’ve never claimed otherwise. That doesn’t mean I need to accept insults or pretend your argument is stronger because you delivered it with condescension.
I made a personal decision not to vaccinate because I felt my health and immunity were fine. That’s my choice. It also doesn’t change the broader evidence that vaccines reduced severe illness and death for many people.
If you want a real discussion, drop the personal attacks. If not, I’m not interested in continuing this.
Yes, and Santa Claus brings presents to children every Christmas. How much is big pharma paying you?
Just as Godless Prussian model educated kids in Nazi Germany believed in Hitler and Jew killing, so Godless mindless kids of today can be made to feel/ not think!
YOU ARE NAIVE.
lol this comment is hilarious.
"established regulatory processes" ftw.
My post was sardonic. The reality is that the shots prevented severe illness, hospitalization, ICU admission and death. This Vigilant Fox article's claims about damage to women's reproductive hewlth and shedding are bunkum. Although you were not prepared to receive the "protection" conferred by the mRNA shots for which the benefits outweighed the risks for yourself, because of your unspecified "beliefs," it's your contention that others should reap these benefits that you yourself were not prepared to. The shots had long been found to be safe for injection into humans and underwent rigorous long term evaluation prior to the authorization for injection into humans. POTUS trump is correct in his assertion that the shots have saved millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of lives.
First of all, that is NOT what they initially claimed. And even if that were true (it is not) it is NOT a justification to break the Nuremberg Code and coerce or even entice (Krispy Kreme donuts) people to get it. No one coerces people to eat healthy or exercise. That is an individual decision. Remember, we all have separate bodies and souls. We are not one mass, owned and managed by the government.
agree that people have the right to make their own health decisions. No one should be forced to take a vaccine. My point is simply that the COVID vaccines, when chosen, were shown in real-world data to reduce severe illness, hospitalization, and death. Public health recommendations don’t take away individual choice—they provide information so people can make informed decisions.
@ Kim: Wrong again! NO DBPC long term studey has EVER been done on any so-called vaccine from our multi billions in Fraud fines Big Pharmas! I.e. all facts you could look up if?
I get that your post was sardonic, and I agree the vaccines helped prevent severe illness and death for many. My point wasn’t to deny that or to tell others what to do—I just wanted to clarify that my choice not to get vaccinated was personal, based on my own beliefs. The benefits for those who chose the shots are clear, and I respect that, but that choice was always mine to make.
"Vaccines" are not meant to help prevent severe illness or death.They are designed to make money and harm humans. The human race has survived for a very long time before "vaccines" were invented. The ingredients of all "vaccines" are toxic-do the research. A natural immune system if kept healthy and strong does not need any chemical assistance.In fact "vaccines" weaken the immune system and that is what they are intended to do! But society has been trained to trust these poisons.Time people stop being sheep!
Vaccines are designed to train the immune system to recognize and fight specific pathogens safely—not to harm people or make money at the expense of health. Scientific evidence from decades of research shows they prevent severe illness, hospitalization, and death for many diseases, including COVID-19. A healthy immune system is important, but it cannot reliably protect against every new or deadly pathogen on its own. Spreading claims that vaccines are poisonous or intentionally harmful ignores overwhelming data and endangers public health.
What a load of rubbish, what is your IQ, minus 10?
Kim, you seem very sure of yourself so I assume you have a background in epidemiology or rigorous scientific research methodology criticism and perhaps philosophy of science.
It would be good if you could rebut the methodological critique in this paper, one of potentially thousands that are critical of the methodology that has been used to assert that the "vaccines" saved lives.
"The Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters against Severe Illness and Death: Scientific Fact or Wishful Myth?”
by Yaakov Ophir, Yaffa Shir-Raz, others — co-authored with Peter McCullough
(PDF) A Step-by-Step Evaluation of the Claim That COVID-19 Vaccines Saved Millions of Lives https://share.google/pLqNoSR2idNVV3Tk9
Key points:
1) “Saved millions of lives” = model-based, not observed
They argue:
• The famous claims (e.g. “vaccines saved millions”) come from epidemiological models
• Not direct empirical measurement
• Therefore depend heavily on:
• assumptions
• counterfactual scenarios
Their claim: change the assumptions → the conclusion changes
2) Observational studies ≠ causal proof
A central philosophy-of-science argument:
• Most vaccine effectiveness estimates come from:
• observational data
• But these are treated as if they show causation
They argue this is:
a category error — confusing association with causation
3) Observational studies ≠ causal proof
A central philosophy-of-science argument:
• Most vaccine effectiveness estimates come from:
• observational data
• But these are treated as if they show causation
They argue this is:
a category error — confusing association with causation
4) Outcome misclassification
They question whether:
• “COVID hospitalisation” and “COVID death” are consistently defined
• Incidental positives are included
→ This could inflate vaccine effectiveness
5) Circular reasoning in models
A key philosophical critique:
• Models assume vaccines reduce severity
• Then use those assumptions to estimate lives saved
→ They argue this is circular inference
I’m not a professional epidemiologist, nor am I here to adjudicate every critique of vaccine modeling. What I do know is that the vaccines underwent large-scale clinical trials and ongoing real-world observational studies, showing clear reductions in severe illness, ICU admission, and death. Yes, models make assumptions, and yes, observational studies are not the same as controlled trials—but that does not erase the consistent patterns seen globally. Claims that the vaccines “saved millions” are shorthand for these observable benefits. Arguing over philosophical nuances of modeling does not change the fact that COVID vaccines substantially reduced harm for countless people. My personal choice not to vaccinate was exactly that—personal—and I do not claim it negates the clear public health impact the shots had.
Try Dr Fauci, he was pushing it, Trump is not a doctor.
TDS is strong. And it is almost hilarious to think that a Dem president would not have done the same thing, albeit with much less bombast. Fauci was hovering above this no matter who was president.
You do know that billions of jabs were given all over the world, right?
Right, and therefore many millions of people have died and gotten injured from them
And Bill Gates was also pushing it, that should tell you something.
Yes. It tells me that this whole thing is bipartisan. And worldwide.
Also, as I have said elsewhere, folks who love that jab do not care or even find interesting the number of deaths and harms caused by the jab will continue to drone on about the totally unproveable meme that millions or billions or even trillions of lives were saved. Blaming Trump is just more TDS. And purposely, IMO, clouds the issue. Biden formed his very own little Covid team the summer before the election. Gates et al. were in charge of everything. Personally, that summer the whole enterprise seemed skeevy to me, not that anything scientific was available, so I said nope from the start. And no matter who was president, given the state of the lying media, I cannot imagine taking the word of a president about anything medical. or anything at all, come to think of it.
I think Dr Naomi Wolf called this out first. And in the book she edited, called The Pfizer Papers, that summarizes the work of over 3,000 volunteer independent scientists who read the Pfizer vax data FOIA-ed from the FDA by ICAN (icandecide.org), it makes it clear that the primary focus of Pfizer was NOT on respiratory disease, but the vaccine's effects on reproduction!! These are first order criminals.
Thank you. I was going to point out that Dr. Wolf was the first to document this.
While I appreciate that he warned about the harm to women, overall Robert Malone is a fraud. Everything he does is for himself. He attacks TRUE freedom fighters like Sasha Latipova, and his wife wrote a hit piece on me for daring to question the efficacy of vaccines. Don't trust him.
Wow. This is pertinent and should be made known to all. I see numerous things that I must have picked up from people shedding the vaccine.
Naomi Wolfe and her team have the most thorough coverage of this in their research of the book, The Pfizer Papers. The courts forced Pfizer to release the info that Pfizer had and wanted “sealed”/hidden for 50+ years. It took a volunteer team of medical legal and research professionals to comb through it and organize it. Pfizer had the information and hid it until they were forced to release it.
Why are you highlighting Dr. Malone? But as time passes, it's obvious he wants more mRNA!
It's all self assembling nano technology. What used to be commonly called nanobots. 25 years ago we learned of a future of nanobots where cancer cures cost pennies because the stuff makes itself. Where unheard of alloys and materials were possible because this stuff 3D prints atoms and molecules. It was all mainstream stuff. I read in Wired magazine.
Now they pretend they don't know what's happening, and changed the name to "exosomes". But when you watch it make nano sized motherboards and chips, you know it's not a life form that is supposed to exist. It's machines, computers, crypto. It's nanobots on your nads and ovaries. And your brain. Everybody has bots on the brain now.
Gee, if we wisards can overlook 60 years of massive fraud and millions of iatrogenic deaths from our Godless, corrupt Big Pharma "medicine," we deserve to be killed and scammed, like sheep to the slaughter house! Only God/ "Our Creator" can save us now
Yup, prolonged periods, excessive bleeding, rashes, shingles, tinnitus, heart palpitations, blotchy red skin, headaches, eye issues, all since 2021 and no jabs???????
I wonder what could it be??
I’m also disturbed by your recommendation of Midwestern Doctors Substack. He has been attacking Dr William Makis who is a true hero saving cancer patients without charging them ridiculous amounts of money.
Worst yet…for those Leftees who never believed us…your own Party of Progressive communists did IT TO YOU….and you thought you might have kids….not really…the Gates desires anti-human vac got you too!
I believe in the shedding theory. I received the first shots in April 2021 but none afterwards. Still, I set about doing a spike protein detox for our family starting over a year ago. I often wonder if I still can shed or not, or if I have any spike protein still in me. I’ve done the detox protocol for about 13 months straight. I’ve had my husband do two rounds of 4-5 months each. Wish there were a way to know …
So some are shedding. What is the cure?
Miss Bill Gates and her cronies know the truth. I bet they detox daily with certain substances and red light therapies, etc.
There's also a treatment called the Human Regenerator Jet: https://hamptonsbiomed.com/treatments/human-regenerator-jet/
Not shocking when you realize Pfizer’s ceo has his degree in veterinarian and focused on sterilizing sheep.
It was a conspiracy, but it was not a theory. It was a fact.
You mention one theory about exosomes. You could also mention another theory advanced by Dr Bryan Ardis with plenty of published support: that the mrna vaccine, as well as Covid infection without an injection, infects not only human cells but also bacterial cells within the gut microbiome, creating a reservoir of infected cells that are outside of the body's regular immune response; and that such infection hijacks the cell's machinery to continually produce a synthesized venom. The venom damages the body and is expelled any way the body is able- respiration, fecal, sweat, etc. This theory allows for shedding and for the common recurrence of symptoms called Long Covid. The best proof of his theory is that the cure he proposes - nicotine patches - actually works both as a prophylactic and as a cure.