The MAHA report raised eyebrows—but sidestepped the elephant in the room.
So how does one respond to the adversarial reports that the document contained citation errors? Simple carelessness, over-reliance on AI, sabotage, or something else? It’s clearly a huge blow to its credibility, whatever its merits.
I believe this is the main article reporting on non-existent citations and pushback from authors who claim the report is mischaracterizing their work: https://www.notus.org/health-science/make-america-healthy-again-report-citation-errors
So how does one respond to the adversarial reports that the document contained citation errors? Simple carelessness, over-reliance on AI, sabotage, or something else? It’s clearly a huge blow to its credibility, whatever its merits.
I believe this is the main article reporting on non-existent citations and pushback from authors who claim the report is mischaracterizing their work: https://www.notus.org/health-science/make-america-healthy-again-report-citation-errors