Did impressionable children know the background of the island’s owner?
Was the predator present at the time of the visit?
Was there any hint of nefarious activities there that innocent children might have witnessed?
If the answer to these questions is no, I fail to see what questions of judgment can legitimately be raised. All I see is that a father and husband took his family to a tropical island resort not unlike any number of Caribbean island destinations in that chain of atolls.
We adults cannot infer from what we know about Epstein and what had taken place there at other times that impressionable children were subject to anything untoward. I smell this entire incident as solely an attempt to smear a political target.
Didn’t Alan Dershowitz take his wife to Epstein’s island? Dershowitz had been Epstein’s attorney and knew about Epstein’s history. One of the “victims” accused Dershowitz of domestic violence impropriety and Dershowitz sued her for defamation. She could not prove anything and the case was either dropped or she lost. The Clintons, Bill, Hillary AND Chelsea stayed at Epstein’s ranch. Certainly they knew of Epstein’s history too.
Very sorry to see Maria Zee going in an Owens-like direction on TPUSA, complete with speculation on Erika Kirk seeming "suspiciously" upbeat about merch sales, and an unearned statement that the government narrative here makes zero sense.
She could have reported on AL's video, and the subsequent visit by a photographer, as well as general TPUSA firing patterns, without any of that kind of framing.
We need Ms. Zee to proceed more carefully--her work in a number of other areas is important. She needs to understand, and very clearly, that we are never returning to giving the likes of Owens the benefit of the doubt, not after what entailed this last fall.
A severe lack of judgement! Absolutely, in the case of Howard Lugnut (oops ... I meant Lutnick -- I don't have to pretend to shield him, since his name was already made public). After his brilliant performance at Davos, he shows up in the notes of Epstein. And it's about him taking the family to Epstein Island!
My only question: Did they fly on the Lolita Express?
My guess is Luttnick met with with someone, perhaps opportunistically, during that “one hour” lunch on Epstein Island with his family in tow. He said he was down there on a family vacation on a boat. How convenient if there was someone that Luttnick was keen to meet with who just happened to be there. But of course we will probably never know.
"The names they didn't want you to see are now public."
If they didn't "want you to see" them, they would not be public.
Reality has devolved into the Jerry Springer show.....on purpose.
Redactions are not necessarily for a cover-up. Everyone knew about Les Wexner…he was no secret associate.
Some questions:
Taking family to an island.
Did impressionable children know the background of the island’s owner?
Was the predator present at the time of the visit?
Was there any hint of nefarious activities there that innocent children might have witnessed?
If the answer to these questions is no, I fail to see what questions of judgment can legitimately be raised. All I see is that a father and husband took his family to a tropical island resort not unlike any number of Caribbean island destinations in that chain of atolls.
We adults cannot infer from what we know about Epstein and what had taken place there at other times that impressionable children were subject to anything untoward. I smell this entire incident as solely an attempt to smear a political target.
Didn’t Alan Dershowitz take his wife to Epstein’s island? Dershowitz had been Epstein’s attorney and knew about Epstein’s history. One of the “victims” accused Dershowitz of domestic violence impropriety and Dershowitz sued her for defamation. She could not prove anything and the case was either dropped or she lost. The Clintons, Bill, Hillary AND Chelsea stayed at Epstein’s ranch. Certainly they knew of Epstein’s history too.
Very sorry to see Maria Zee going in an Owens-like direction on TPUSA, complete with speculation on Erika Kirk seeming "suspiciously" upbeat about merch sales, and an unearned statement that the government narrative here makes zero sense.
She could have reported on AL's video, and the subsequent visit by a photographer, as well as general TPUSA firing patterns, without any of that kind of framing.
We need Ms. Zee to proceed more carefully--her work in a number of other areas is important. She needs to understand, and very clearly, that we are never returning to giving the likes of Owens the benefit of the doubt, not after what entailed this last fall.
How does that woman know who sent the photographer?
"Praise God from whom all (true) blessings flow..."! (The Doxology.)
Sex trafficking is in every large city, and this Epstein stuff, is rightly called a gossip project to embarrass the rich and famous.
Meanwhile, the lowly, are abused!
Please, Fox, contact, Vets4ChildRescue. And let’s help, those, that need the help, the most.
The depths of deprivity are be exposed!
https://youtu.be/1yzHiOTI4Fk
My video on the Epstein files
A severe lack of judgement! Absolutely, in the case of Howard Lugnut (oops ... I meant Lutnick -- I don't have to pretend to shield him, since his name was already made public). After his brilliant performance at Davos, he shows up in the notes of Epstein. And it's about him taking the family to Epstein Island!
My only question: Did they fly on the Lolita Express?
They were on a family boat trip. Boat.
My guess is Luttnick met with with someone, perhaps opportunistically, during that “one hour” lunch on Epstein Island with his family in tow. He said he was down there on a family vacation on a boat. How convenient if there was someone that Luttnick was keen to meet with who just happened to be there. But of course we will probably never know.