Medical drugs and vaccines stress the human body...They do not do one thing to heal it. On top of drug and vaccines...the #2 problem is the Processed Food Industry...There is very little nutritional value in its foods...only calories. Growing up in the fifties, we were not inundated with vaccines or medicine...and processed foods were not so readily available. There was no obesity at the time...Today it is a massive problem.
"Global life expectancy" confounds your conclusion, as both nutrition and longevity was at that time vastly different between the affluent West and the under-developed nations.
Dropping from back when it is claimed that things were "healthier". I agree our diet contains sh¡t. But just do the math. We are living longer now than then. So it isn't diet. Im trying to find common ground here. Its probably something artificial which was introduced. Like vaccines.
it is not a coincidence that parents have claimed for years that SIDS is caused by vaccines. And right after people started dying from the Covid vaccines, rather than admit, they were Poison, what did they tell us?
The amount of programming and brainwashing and thought shaping elite social engineers have invested across society for generations to effectively render the masses mentally incapable of seeing the obvious truth in front of them is astounding. Vaccines are unsafe, ineffective, and are a thinly veiled population reduction tool, vis a vis being another weapon - along with the processed food industry - to funnel people into the for-profit health care industry by essentially making them sick, neutered, and sources of profit along the way.
People are walking zombies today. Their programming comes with a built-in defense mechanism; whenever a question or challenge is posed to the zombie-mind narrative, the zombie will immediately go on the attack, accusing the questioner of the things they are guilty of, in order to deflect attention away from themselves.’ They will criticize and attack and condemn any thought or person that says it and condemn them as an enemy. A rational person will remember it’s important to make an effort to critically examine the narrative without simply echoing the sources. A zombie will not do that because at the core their beliefs start to crumble and fall apart, and are indefensible.
The tactic they use is the emperor’s new clothes tactic.
Anybody who speaks against the narrative is “stupid” or some other pejorative.
Several studies in psychology such as the Asch conformity experiment , the Milgrim shock ex periment, the Stanford prison experiment , and othershave proven that the majority of people will either conform or obey authority without question.
For an interesting read or listen
Look up “ academy of ideas: manufacturing mass psychosis. Can sanity return to an insane world?” Joost Meerloo coined the term “Menticide: the rape of the mind” in 1961.
There are many tactics that have been employed on the American people for decades. Most Americans have not been aware of them. But they are working very well.
Even conservatives would not believe it if I told them some of the tactics they have fallen for.
Wholeheartedly agree with you on ALL points. We also have to look at all the takeaways people are eating now and getting fat and sick on. You only have to look at videos and old photos from the 50s,60s, 70s and 80s to see how much slimmer people were.
No need. The Japanese stopped jabbing all children under two years old for a two year period back in the 90's I think it was until they were forced to restart the jabbing by their occupying force, the USA.
In that two year period SIDS virtually disappeared in Japan.
The owners of big pharma have known at least since then, and of course they have known much longer than that from their own trials, that vaccines kill children in their millions around the world each and every year.
The religion of those that control the banks and big pharma etc etc etc revolves around killing and maiming children for fun.
I now did get the answer why the study was not published and unfortunately why it will most probably never be published.
The answer is in the document submitted by Aaron Siri as pre-cursor for his testimony at the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations on September 9, 2025. His written statement is provided for circulation to the Subcommittee Members and Staff in advance of that hearing.
> Reviewing these tables and this chart [see previous pages] should make it clear why the study’s authors and Henry Ford Health did not want this study published. For the authors, publishing this study would have turned virtually every person and institution in their world against them. Publishing the study would have been the right thing to do. The brave thing to do. But it would have ignited the wrath of nearly everyone and every institution that they know, rely upon, and hold dear.
Of course, if doing the right thing, the moral thing, the ethical thing regarding vaccines did not involve potential social and career suicide, we would not be in the current predicament in which we find ourselves. If this study, and others like it, were conducted and were published in medical journals, the first scientific step needed to protect children from vaccine injury would have been taken. We can do far better than a society in which more than half of our children suffer from a chronic health condition. We can save children from both harm from infectious diseases and harm from these products.
It is worthwhile to note that in his 12-page document in preparation for the hearing that Aaron Siri copied large parts of the non-published study that was provided to him by the researchers.
So even if the full study has not and will most probably never be published, the methodology, findings, charts and conclusions addressed in that study are available, and hence can be replicated in other settings.
There are no links. Like I said in my other comment, some of us can actually read the stats and do the math. I've done enough analytics using VAERS as a source on my own to be of a similar mind, but the tables provided in the article still do not link to the actual studies which could be riddled with issues, so if the Vigilant Fox wants us to separate propaganda from actual facts, this cuts both ways.
This study cruelly ignores the potential for revenue loss of pharma. These people have numerous homes, aircraft, servants, mistresses, to support. You would deny them??
I do recall Dr. Zervos standing for informed consent and religious or philosophical exemption, early in the shot mandate phase, &especially for Henry Ford health care employee exemptions. I live in Detroit area and was grateful someone in my neck of the woods was willing to stand up for his fellow employees right to dissent
I would like to compare the findings of Dr Zervos's with Dr Paul's 2024 study correlated with his Vax Facts book. It seems both these studies show similar findings and seem worthy of mainstream media coverage
I don't understand. Has the study now been published, or is it still under wraps? In any event, how could ICAN have sat on it for five years? How is it that they're talking about it now but were (suspiciously?) silent about it for years? Have they now been permitted to do this, or are they doing it without authorization?
You really should watch the exchange between Blumenthal, Johnson and Siri for a better appreciation of the answer to your question. Basically, Siri and Del Bigtree convinced the very pro vax authors to do the study. Afterall, what would they have to lose and everything to gain because the authors expected that they would prove that the jabs were safe, putting an end to vaccine critics. Much to the authors’ surprise, they found that the opposite was true. There were way more Chronic conditions in the jabbed group. Notably, there were no cases of ADHD in the unjabbed group! The authors refused to publish the study because they were afraid of losing their job and career. Siri and Bigtree recognized that publicizing the results needed to come from the very provax people who did the study. Sen, Johnson chimed in and told Blumenthal that it was he, Johnson, who pushed for the study’s results to be revealed. During the hearing, Siri reviewed the damning results in detail. It was a discussion very much worth watching and far better than I can explain here.
Thanks, Metta. You explained the reason better and more succinctly than I. That’s why I think it is better for readers to see for themselves than for me to explain what happened.
However, I agree with you completely: I think it would be far better for people to see for themselves ~ and I didn't mean to undermine your wise recommendation. In fact, I hesitated to say anything at all for this very reason.
Nonetheless, I eventually cratered and posted my comment since I know so many people tend to make snap judgements, and I thought it might help to provide just a bit of a clue.
God created Mother Earth which Lives and Breathes Life , who would want to change what God created ?
God gave us Ten Commandments and informed us of the Seven Sins God dislikes the most.
Thou Shalt not Steal is One of God's Ten Commandments and Stealing is a Criminal Offence.
Thou Shalt not Kill is One of God's Ten Commandments and Murder and Genocide are Criminal Offences.
The Rule of Law was built on God's Fundamental Principles .
WHO/EU/IMF/NATO/WEF/NWO foundations are Not Compliant with God's Fundamental Principles , The Magna Carta 1215 , The Doctrine Bill of Rights 1688/89 and 1776 , The Hippocratic Oath , The Nuremberg Code 1947 and The Geneva Protocol ?
A Fictitious Fiat Currency without a Debt Ceiling to indebt the West , which is caused by outside control , using insider influence , to dismantle the strength of any country , which is Treason , following the money , compensating the countries and dismantling systems which are Not Compliant with God's Fundamental Principles.
All Referendums are Not Legally Binding .
President Trump fills stadiums which ever state he visits , the Will of the People. Robert F Kennedy Jr. has the backing of the Will of the People.
All well and good, but I am in Healthcare and want to see the study and read it myself. Since the pandemic I do not trust any media, alternative or not. The study is not available on Pubmed yet.
Medical drugs and vaccines stress the human body...They do not do one thing to heal it. On top of drug and vaccines...the #2 problem is the Processed Food Industry...There is very little nutritional value in its foods...only calories. Growing up in the fifties, we were not inundated with vaccines or medicine...and processed foods were not so readily available. There was no obesity at the time...Today it is a massive problem.
Add to it all the chemicals that they inject into process foods and it’s a third source of unhealthy outcomes!
ALL VAX-UNVAX studies here:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/vaxxed-2x-chance-of-chronic-diseases
I don't buy that. Global life expectancy at birth rising from around 46–48 years in 1950 to over 73 years in the early 2020s. It's something else.
"Global life expectancy" confounds your conclusion, as both nutrition and longevity was at that time vastly different between the affluent West and the under-developed nations.
It’s dropping now. So is infant mortality. Something needs to be changed,
Dropping from back when it is claimed that things were "healthier". I agree our diet contains sh¡t. But just do the math. We are living longer now than then. So it isn't diet. Im trying to find common ground here. Its probably something artificial which was introduced. Like vaccines.
Can we look at SIDS next?
it is not a coincidence that parents have claimed for years that SIDS is caused by vaccines. And right after people started dying from the Covid vaccines, rather than admit, they were Poison, what did they tell us?
They said that it was SADS
Sudden adult death syndrome.
Wow, what a coincidence!
The amount of programming and brainwashing and thought shaping elite social engineers have invested across society for generations to effectively render the masses mentally incapable of seeing the obvious truth in front of them is astounding. Vaccines are unsafe, ineffective, and are a thinly veiled population reduction tool, vis a vis being another weapon - along with the processed food industry - to funnel people into the for-profit health care industry by essentially making them sick, neutered, and sources of profit along the way.
People are walking zombies today. Their programming comes with a built-in defense mechanism; whenever a question or challenge is posed to the zombie-mind narrative, the zombie will immediately go on the attack, accusing the questioner of the things they are guilty of, in order to deflect attention away from themselves.’ They will criticize and attack and condemn any thought or person that says it and condemn them as an enemy. A rational person will remember it’s important to make an effort to critically examine the narrative without simply echoing the sources. A zombie will not do that because at the core their beliefs start to crumble and fall apart, and are indefensible.
You are correct.
The tactic they use is the emperor’s new clothes tactic.
Anybody who speaks against the narrative is “stupid” or some other pejorative.
Several studies in psychology such as the Asch conformity experiment , the Milgrim shock ex periment, the Stanford prison experiment , and othershave proven that the majority of people will either conform or obey authority without question.
For an interesting read or listen
Look up “ academy of ideas: manufacturing mass psychosis. Can sanity return to an insane world?” Joost Meerloo coined the term “Menticide: the rape of the mind” in 1961.
There are many tactics that have been employed on the American people for decades. Most Americans have not been aware of them. But they are working very well.
Even conservatives would not believe it if I told them some of the tactics they have fallen for.
Excellent resources! Thanks for sharing, RD.
Wholeheartedly agree with you on ALL points. We also have to look at all the takeaways people are eating now and getting fat and sick on. You only have to look at videos and old photos from the 50s,60s, 70s and 80s to see how much slimmer people were.
For those who are interested, Naomi Wolf provides an excellent description of this dynamic based on the book "The Indoctrinated Brain"
> Book: https://www.amazon.com/Indoctrinated-Brain-Successfully-Global-Freedom-ebook/dp/B0C6L1JDMF
> Naomi's Video: https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/a30ac58b907b
No need. The Japanese stopped jabbing all children under two years old for a two year period back in the 90's I think it was until they were forced to restart the jabbing by their occupying force, the USA.
In that two year period SIDS virtually disappeared in Japan.
The owners of big pharma have known at least since then, and of course they have known much longer than that from their own trials, that vaccines kill children in their millions around the world each and every year.
The religion of those that control the banks and big pharma etc etc etc revolves around killing and maiming children for fun.
There's no question about SIDS. Japan proved the vaccine link in 1975:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/2e97cce7b4f6
Can somebody provide a link to download that suppressed study?
I’ve received a few emails about it today, but no link to the actual study. More written about it here:
https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/breaking-henry-ford-vaxxed-vs-unvaxxed
I now did get the answer why the study was not published and unfortunately why it will most probably never be published.
The answer is in the document submitted by Aaron Siri as pre-cursor for his testimony at the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations on September 9, 2025. His written statement is provided for circulation to the Subcommittee Members and Staff in advance of that hearing.
Here the link to that 12-page document > https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Siri-Testimony-1.pdf
and the two last paragraphs state:
> Reviewing these tables and this chart [see previous pages] should make it clear why the study’s authors and Henry Ford Health did not want this study published. For the authors, publishing this study would have turned virtually every person and institution in their world against them. Publishing the study would have been the right thing to do. The brave thing to do. But it would have ignited the wrath of nearly everyone and every institution that they know, rely upon, and hold dear.
Of course, if doing the right thing, the moral thing, the ethical thing regarding vaccines did not involve potential social and career suicide, we would not be in the current predicament in which we find ourselves. If this study, and others like it, were conducted and were published in medical journals, the first scientific step needed to protect children from vaccine injury would have been taken. We can do far better than a society in which more than half of our children suffer from a chronic health condition. We can save children from both harm from infectious diseases and harm from these products.
It is worthwhile to note that in his 12-page document in preparation for the hearing that Aaron Siri copied large parts of the non-published study that was provided to him by the researchers.
So even if the full study has not and will most probably never be published, the methodology, findings, charts and conclusions addressed in that study are available, and hence can be replicated in other settings.
For sure to be continued...
There are no links. Like I said in my other comment, some of us can actually read the stats and do the math. I've done enough analytics using VAERS as a source on my own to be of a similar mind, but the tables provided in the article still do not link to the actual studies which could be riddled with issues, so if the Vigilant Fox wants us to separate propaganda from actual facts, this cuts both ways.
This study cruelly ignores the potential for revenue loss of pharma. These people have numerous homes, aircraft, servants, mistresses, to support. You would deny them??
💯🤣
Not to mention their life long customers, needing “treatments” just to survive.. 😔
I do recall Dr. Zervos standing for informed consent and religious or philosophical exemption, early in the shot mandate phase, &especially for Henry Ford health care employee exemptions. I live in Detroit area and was grateful someone in my neck of the woods was willing to stand up for his fellow employees right to dissent
Good to know. Thanks, Michael.
Yes, inconvenient indeed.
I would like to compare the findings of Dr Zervos's with Dr Paul's 2024 study correlated with his Vax Facts book. It seems both these studies show similar findings and seem worthy of mainstream media coverage
More about Dr. Paul's study, for those who are interested:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/b54a22399ce6
Other similar data:
> Q. Who is Healthier: Vaxxed or Unvaxxed?
-- https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/b89a19eeae2c
Immediately the deniers come along on cue, shrieking and barking:
- PEER REVIEW!
- WHITE PAPER!!
I can’t even with them. They’re dumber than circus monkeys and not nearly as entertaining
…..no more “vaccines”….
Criminal
I just sent ICAN $100 on top of the $100 from beginning of this year. Fantastic job they are doing
Why am I no longer even mildly surprised when ideology overrides science.
I don't understand. Has the study now been published, or is it still under wraps? In any event, how could ICAN have sat on it for five years? How is it that they're talking about it now but were (suspiciously?) silent about it for years? Have they now been permitted to do this, or are they doing it without authorization?
Watch the Senate hearing and you will learn why.
Our you could share the reason why.
You really should watch the exchange between Blumenthal, Johnson and Siri for a better appreciation of the answer to your question. Basically, Siri and Del Bigtree convinced the very pro vax authors to do the study. Afterall, what would they have to lose and everything to gain because the authors expected that they would prove that the jabs were safe, putting an end to vaccine critics. Much to the authors’ surprise, they found that the opposite was true. There were way more Chronic conditions in the jabbed group. Notably, there were no cases of ADHD in the unjabbed group! The authors refused to publish the study because they were afraid of losing their job and career. Siri and Bigtree recognized that publicizing the results needed to come from the very provax people who did the study. Sen, Johnson chimed in and told Blumenthal that it was he, Johnson, who pushed for the study’s results to be revealed. During the hearing, Siri reviewed the damning results in detail. It was a discussion very much worth watching and far better than I can explain here.
Aaron Siri explained all of this in the Senate hearing.
The whole point was to have the study published in a peer reviewed journal so it would be "bullet proof" from the all the pro-vaxx critics.
Anything less than that risks the kind of pro-vaxx criticisms that are already surfacing.
According to Senator Ron Johnson, the reason this is coming out now is b/c he was pushing for it.
If you don't want to watch the video, read Aaron's testimony. VF provided the link above.
Thanks, Metta. You explained the reason better and more succinctly than I. That’s why I think it is better for readers to see for themselves than for me to explain what happened.
Thank you, Allie.
However, I agree with you completely: I think it would be far better for people to see for themselves ~ and I didn't mean to undermine your wise recommendation. In fact, I hesitated to say anything at all for this very reason.
Nonetheless, I eventually cratered and posted my comment since I know so many people tend to make snap judgements, and I thought it might help to provide just a bit of a clue.
Thanks for understanding.
https://rumble.com/v36eaws-dr.-abdul-alim-muhammad-exposes-100-death-rate-in-vaccine-testing-on-humani.html
God created Mother Earth which Lives and Breathes Life , who would want to change what God created ?
God gave us Ten Commandments and informed us of the Seven Sins God dislikes the most.
Thou Shalt not Steal is One of God's Ten Commandments and Stealing is a Criminal Offence.
Thou Shalt not Kill is One of God's Ten Commandments and Murder and Genocide are Criminal Offences.
The Rule of Law was built on God's Fundamental Principles .
WHO/EU/IMF/NATO/WEF/NWO foundations are Not Compliant with God's Fundamental Principles , The Magna Carta 1215 , The Doctrine Bill of Rights 1688/89 and 1776 , The Hippocratic Oath , The Nuremberg Code 1947 and The Geneva Protocol ?
A Fictitious Fiat Currency without a Debt Ceiling to indebt the West , which is caused by outside control , using insider influence , to dismantle the strength of any country , which is Treason , following the money , compensating the countries and dismantling systems which are Not Compliant with God's Fundamental Principles.
All Referendums are Not Legally Binding .
President Trump fills stadiums which ever state he visits , the Will of the People. Robert F Kennedy Jr. has the backing of the Will of the People.
God Bless U.S.A.
How to Check Your Vote
www.Sleazeexpo.wordpress.com
All well and good, but I am in Healthcare and want to see the study and read it myself. Since the pandemic I do not trust any media, alternative or not. The study is not available on Pubmed yet.
The video and transcript explain why.