65 Comments
User's avatar
goatsRstillgruffy's avatar

“Fill out a hurt feelings report, buy a comfort rock”. OMG, classic Senator Kennedy! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. I love that man!!

Expand full comment
misty's avatar

Came here to say this! ☝🏼☝🏼😂

Expand full comment
Wendy's avatar

OMG I DO TOO!!!

Expand full comment
Old Biddy's avatar

So her food stamps did not cover Pepsi but did cover coke, canada dry, etc? Her whole basket was full of rubbish [bar the watermelon] - is this what taxpayers are paying for?

Expand full comment
joasis's avatar

Yes, that's what taxpayers are paying for. In the early days pre-welfare, the poor received surplus beans, potatoes, and cheese instead of cash handouts, and nobody starved. We should go back to that.

Expand full comment
Wendy's avatar

Unfortunately yes…

Expand full comment
Pirate Studebaker's avatar

That is one solitary example and NO that's not usual. BTW, I don't know what century you live in but it's called SNAP.

Expand full comment
joasis's avatar

Doesn't matter what you call it; stealing money from someone who earned it and giving it to someone who didn't is wrong by any name.

Expand full comment
Pirate Studebaker's avatar

You are clearly deranged and I'll take an educated guess - living off your grandma's fixed income in the basement and hogging all the cat food.

Expand full comment
joasis's avatar

You call me deranged because i want to keep more of what i earned instead of tyrants stealing it and giving it to worthless parasitic lumps?

Expand full comment
Pirate Studebaker's avatar

Are you living off grandma in the basement and hogging the cat food?

Expand full comment
joasis's avatar

"Things said by parasitic lumps for $100, Alex"

Expand full comment
Deborah's avatar

Well I will always call it Welfare because that's exactly what it is. If people had the stigma attached like the old days they would get off their lazy entitled rears and work any job.

Expand full comment
Pirate Studebaker's avatar

That's not only insane but also profoundly ignorant.

Over 60% of SNAP beneficiaries are employed. The other 30% are the elderly and disabled.

Mental illness needs treatment. Good luck.

Expand full comment
TomL's avatar

How about like what MTG is saying on steroids; the msm and Israel and their lackeys have been burying how badly Israel lost the unprovoked attack on Iran! They had to get a peace agreement!

Expand full comment
joasis's avatar

Iran has been provoking Israel for most of a century. Israel only responds to the most dire threats. i'm wondering why you side with terrorists.

Expand full comment
TomL's avatar

Israel's state terrorism is legendary; the ICJ found that Israel was guilty of all types of war crimes and genocide, it's a proven fact! Netanyahu and his people are psychos, launching an unprovoked war on another sovereign country.

And how about Israel's welfare from the US? Because they're unable to negotiate peace with neighboring countries they insist on killing everyone who questions their lawless actions. No other country could get away with this and they've gotten tens of billions of dollars from the US in the last year!

Expand full comment
joasis's avatar

Proven fact? You probably believe the muslim terrorists who pretend to be victims in the staged photos.

Expand full comment
TomL's avatar

Napolitano has former intelligence officials and diplomats on his program and they all are in agreement on Israel's perfidy: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=napolitano+judge

Expand full comment
joasis's avatar

A lot of them said Hunter's laptop wasn't real, too.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jun 27
Comment removed
Expand full comment
TomL's avatar

These intelligence analysts went through it a few hours ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzIaCNc8HBA

Israel had suffered over 500 billion dollars of losses days before the war was ended. Israel lost even with US support. And they're going to use Gaza as a place where they can believe they're "winning" in the midst of their war crimes: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jun/27/israel-gaza-propaganda?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark&fbclid=IwY2xjawLMEt5leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFPTGRjS0RsRXl3MjROTFhuAR5dOhb4bLEAWzUXRa6iDE3B_xaGMtpTKnyQFiwcBOoyuRSTPBCghEsFBl_4Jw_aem_pV_cBSpzhsa30CfcWenvgQ

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jun 28
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Deborah's avatar

Don't forget HamsAss steals the food and supplies that Israel provides to their enemies (btw no other people ob the entire planet does this!!) and charges the Arabs in Gaza exorbitant prices to rob them and fund their scumbag leaders. TomL the hate filled liar can shove it.

Expand full comment
TomL's avatar

Chat GPT?

Expand full comment
joasis's avatar

muslim?

Expand full comment
TomL's avatar

AIPAC bot?

Expand full comment
peter allen's avatar

well said and i believe iran's terror incorporated has been delt a severe blow

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jun 28
Comment removed
Expand full comment
TomL's avatar

The ICJ found that Israel was guilty of all types of war crimes and genocide, it's a proven fact! Netanyahu and his people are psychos, launching an unprovoked war on another sovereign country.

The myth of Israel's Palestinian targets being somehow in the wrong when Israel has been proven to be at fault is absurd. The most rigorous studies of the number of dead in Gaza puts the figures well over 100,000 and by now everyone has seen the vicious murders of innocent civilians by IDF killers.

As for the October 7 story line, no pregnant women were killed as the ICJ's examination showed, Israel was asked for the names of these supposed women and Israel couldn't provide a single one.

War crimes; against the Palestinians, against their neighbors in Lebanon and every other country Mossad targets, Israel and their AIPAC sell-outs in Congress are racist killers.

Expand full comment
T. Paine's avatar

I don’t think there should be food stamps or SNAP cards. I think if you can’t afford to buy food, you should receive a bulk shipment of whole foods such as rice, beans, meat, eggs, milk, salt, flour, corn meal, etc. along with instructions on how to cook. If you want to eat expensive processed food- then make your own money and buy it.

I once was in line behind a woman at the EZ Mart in my town. She spent SNAP benefits on expensive convenience store junk food and drinks, then pulled out a wad of cash and dropped $50 on beer and lottery tickets. Screw that! If you can afford to waste money on crap I can’t, why are my tax dollars paying for your food? These people should be subject to personal audits if they are going to spend OUR public money.

Expand full comment
Synickel's avatar

Like hell gas prices are down. I just got gas for my car and for my farm equipment and it was 20 cents a gallon higher than it was last week.

Expand full comment
Pirate Studebaker's avatar

Same in OK. I think they're lying.

Expand full comment
Synickel's avatar

Right, and I'm in Arkansas. Both of our states are usually the lower end of gas cost.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jun 28
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Pirate Studebaker's avatar

You're right. I'm not going to spend the time verifying, so I'm editing my comment.

I think they are lying. I don't know for certain.

Expand full comment
misty's avatar

But was it down from a year ago?

Expand full comment
Synickel's avatar

No.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jun 27
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Pirate Studebaker's avatar

Gas prices are not lower and haven't been. The price where I live was not 3.50/gal last year. It was under 3/gal at about 2.85/gal.

Has it ever occured to you they could easily be lying about lower gas prices to up Trump's lack of approval ratings?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jun 28
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Pirate Studebaker's avatar

So you trust numbers compiled by a federal government bureaucracy?

Why do you assume this agency is nonpartisan when there have been many instances of skewed data produced by many agencies?

Expand full comment
Synickel's avatar

Trust your eyes and experience. Either it is or it isn't. Whether they're lying or not is mostly irrelevant. Chloe is just being a psychobabble agitator.

Expand full comment
Pirate Studebaker's avatar

I sometimes like to stretch my mind for exercise by countering the psychobabble. If it's enough of a challenge.

I visit this site because I know it's propaganda and I sometimes counter their claims just in case someone needs a little help seeing it.

Like lifting dead weights for the brain. Thanks.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jun 28
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Pirate Studebaker's avatar

To verify this particular claim would require mountains of research and data and I don't think that's a use of time I care to invest nor do I think I could succeed in compiling the data.

I go with what I do know. It's not opinion. It's personal experiences. So, I'm not in or promoting any dangerous activity or places to be.

I am relying on my own actual life experiences and using that as a baseline since I have no ability to collect and crosscheck gasoline prices across the entire country from last year and compare them to current collected gasoline prices from across the country for this year.

That is exactly what reports like the one from this government agency are counting on. They know I, as an individual, don't have the ability to collect said data and so I will accept their data over my own experience.

I, on the other hand, trust my own eyes and ears and experiences over numbers produced by a government agency I have no ability to cross-check.

Logic. If you choose to believe what a government agency tells you is true, that's your prerogative, of course.

Expand full comment
TiredCitizen's avatar

I love Senator Kennedy, but what exactly has Congress done since January???

Expand full comment
Leskunque Lepew's avatar

The same thing they've done for decades....have lunch with their lobbyists......then go home.

Expand full comment
Cathleen Manny's avatar

Story #6 is a perfect example of ‘boiling frog’ syndrome. Having the ‘right’ to OPT OUT of this crap may feel like progress, but it is not. That crap shouldn’t be there in the first place.

Expand full comment
BE's avatar

Democratic socialism! In other words Communism! Nothing new under the sun. Never worked any where else in the world, but now we can make it work here!!

Expand full comment
Netra Halperin's avatar

I am Jewish. I do not support Zionism. I do not support Israel. MTG is correct. We need to put "America first", not Israel, the most racist country I've ever visited.

Expand full comment
jazminew38@gmail.com's avatar

Humble, modest, truthful, eloquent, resilient and hard working! These are the characteristics of the Muslim, not those terrorists who US and the West creates and funds such as ISIS, The White Helmets, AlNusra and HTS. Compare that to Trump! It is beyond belief that uneducated, uncivilsed, shallow, vile felon person as Trump is the US president. It says lots about his voters.

Expand full comment
Dreamom3's avatar

Pretty sure Chavez convinced the Venezuelans that there needed to be a better distribution of wealth too.

Expand full comment
Lynn's avatar

Momdani....hmmm Muslim implant to push a become one of us or die agenda?

Expand full comment
King Cavan's avatar

"The rule of law", that's an interesting phrase. Politicians, elected by people, should rule not unelected judges. Laws exist to deal with various aspects of our society, with business activities, to protect citizens, to ensure criminality does not become endemic & so on. It does not exist to control political activity, except when such activity is criminal in nature.

I believe in the rule of the people, expressed through election to positions of political power. The law has no business ruling us.

Expand full comment
Kevin Beck's avatar

A correction should be issued by MSNBC about what that "legal analyst" said regarding the Supreme Court.

It was not "Republican justices" on the Supreme Court that took away lower courts' mode of weaponization against President Trump; it was the Supreme Court.

In case she doesn't know, the decisions by the Supreme Court are made by the Court as a whole; they are not made by a sub-group of justices. The decisions by the Court are signed by a majority that agree on all the points. The same analyst could have (properly) stated that the Democrat justices refused to see the law does not allow for the actions of the rogue judges, since those three judges signed the dissenting opinion.

Expand full comment
John Bitna's avatar

Not just America, the entire world is winning!

God bless America and God bless President Trump. 🇺🇸

Expand full comment
joasis's avatar

Sam's accepts EBT? That just ain't right. The wholesale club is ostensibly for small business and small business should not have EBT cards.

Expand full comment