Tucker Carlson Takes a Deep Dive Into Unanswered Questions About the 2017 Las Vegas Massacre
The official explanation for it makes no sense. Americans deserve answers.
This article originally appeared on Infowars and was republished with permission.
Tucker Carlson spoke with journalist and podcast host Ian Carroll this week for a lengthy talk about the deadly 2017 Las Vegas shooting, covering the slew of unanswered questions that remain about the nation’s deadliest mass shooting.
The Truthman@TheTruthmanWins
Did you know that the largest mass shooting in American History was at The Jason Aldean concert in Las Vegas?
I didn't. I pretty much forgot about it, & it seems like that was by design.
Why would you ever question someone who questions the government/media narrative for
9:06 PM · Jan 2, 2026 · 95 Views
2 Likes
The duo also touched on mysteries surrounding the official narrative about the Charlie Kirk assassination.
Tucker Carlson Network@TCNetwork
“Charlie Kirk is months, months ago now, and to this day I think most Americans still feel like we don’t have an honest set of answers.”
@IanCarrollShow and @TuckerCarlson discuss Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
“There’s been an enormous amount of rage, different people with
6:28 PM · Jan 2, 2026 · 170K Views
337 Replies · 625 Reposts · 4.24K Likes
Watch the full discussion below:
Tucker Carlson@TuckerCarlson
The 2017 Las Vegas massacre was by far the deadliest mass shooting in American history. The official explanation for it makes no sense. Ian Carroll explains what we know for sure.
(0:00) What Was the Las Vegas Shooting?
(10:43) The Active Shooter at McCarran Airport
(16:40) The
6:00 PM · Jan 2, 2026 · 1.14M Views
845 Replies · 2.12K Reposts · 9.5K Likes
Copyright 2026 Infowars
Really appreciate how this conversation focuses on the timeline inconsistencies thatkeep getting ignored. The point about the secondary shooter reports at McCarran Airport is particularly interesting because it challenges the lone wolf framing in such a direct way. I remember when this happened, and even back then the speed at which the media moved on felt off. What's striking is how mass casualty events generate tons of initial documentation from first responders, yet we rarely see forensic breakdowns that challenge official accounts. The forensic ballistics alone should've sparked more debate given the distance and accuracy claims. This kind of journalism is badly needd when institutions stop asking hard questions.
Thanks for the clips! (As I am one of the many conservatives who are resolved now to avoid giving Carlson any more hits, even though he still does very fine work.)
The LV massacre is one of the big unresolved issues. The Trumpies need to get serious.