60 Comments
User's avatar
Kenyon Taylor's avatar

I am curious. Are you taking the government's word for who the killer is? What about the jet that took off right after the killing? The anomalous "changing of clothes', and disassembly of the gun on the roof, only to reassemble it so the FBI could find it.... The destruction of evidence right after the shooting by guys who were on stage? This story doesn't make sense. Please let us all know what you really think. Thank you, a long0time follower of yours.

Expand full comment
MM's avatar

I don’t like this either, the information provided doesn’t make sense. Robinson is this situation’s Oswald.

Expand full comment
NJ Election Advisor's avatar

And along comes Jack Ruby

Jacob Leon Rubenstein

Expand full comment
Dan’l's avatar
6hEdited

Climb up out of your rabbit holes, and think it through.

: : edit : :

That was meant to be humorous; not insulting.

Sorry, to any offended.

: : /edit : :

They got the right guy, and others in his circles may have been involved, but even his own family were part of his being turned in.

: : while I’m at it, I’ll add : :

In regard to those circles… could be the boyfriend didn’t know, but clearly failed to come forward once he did.

The one detained destroying a memorial to Charlie Kirk is on the left, the one that murdered him (enhancement of FBI photo) is on the right: they’re wearing the very same t-shirts. (can’t post the photos, soOo see link).

https://substack.com/@keyknee/note/c-156765508?r=1isuhh&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

Expand full comment
Heidi Heil STOPS Thymectomy's avatar

Ever wonder why there wasn't good protection for Charlie, enabling someone to get on a roof and get away with murder? Even people in the crowd saw the killer but the bodyguards didn't? There is a saying for this- turning a blind eye.

Expand full comment
Jeff Cook-Coyle's avatar

It is a very important question. I can only guess, but here it is: God had Charlie's back. Nothing would happen to Charlie that was not allowed to happen, was not part of God's plan. Did he want to be there as a dad for his kids? Of course. Did his kids come before what God wanted? Did his wife? Nope, and nope again.

I am going to paraphrase one of Jesus's parables. It is about a man who finds a pearl in a field; and with great joy sells all that he has to buy the field. Jesus is that joy. Charlie sold everything for it. We are left alone, missing him. But Charlie is in heaven greeting people, and then will praise God for eternity.

Yeah, it's cool to be the one who unites Bobby Kennedy and the Trump campaign. And what fun to think about the sparklers, and all that. And Charlie was one of the folks pushing hard for JD for VP. He was having a huge impact in America, and is missed around the world. But would Charlie take heaven over all that? Every single time, if it was his God is calling for.

Expand full comment
Heidi Heil STOPS Thymectomy's avatar

You dont read the Bible much do you? God does not control this world, Satan does. God does not plan peoples death. The horrible things that happened to Charlie had nothing to do with God taking action or not taking action. It had to do with humans.

Throughout history people who aren't serving greedy, corrupt, zealot leaders have been directly murdered or allowed to be murdered through lack of protection to serve men's plans, not God's.

Expand full comment
Jeff Cook-Coyle's avatar

I have read the entire Bible easily a dozen times. I am really enjoying the New Living Testament currently. I just got into the Servant Songs in Isaiah.

I disagree with your interpretation of it. Satan had to go to God to sift Job. God knows every hair on our head. Not a sparrow falls without God knowing about it; and we are worth far more than sparrows.

People can turn their back on God, and eventually God turns His back on them. But that was NOT Charlie’s story. God had his back. Charlie’s Golden Rule shtick could only work that way.

There always have been martyrs, and there will be for a long time to come (unless Jesus returns sooner). It was not a lack of God’s protection that allows that.

Expand full comment
Heidi Heil STOPS Thymectomy's avatar

Satan's Influence on Government:

Revelation 13: This chapter describes a "beast" that represents a man-centered, oppressive government system, propped up by man-centered religious institutions, with Satan working behind the scenes to harm the church and mislead the world.

The "Ruler of this World": Jesus referred to Satan as the "ruler of this world" in John 12:31, and the apostle Paul in 2 Corinthians 4:4 calls Satan the "god of this world," suggesting a broad influence over human systems.

The Temptation of Jesus: In Luke 4:5-6, Satan tempts Jesus by offering him "all the kingdoms of the world," demonstrating his ability to exert authority over earthly powers.

"The Whole World Lying in the Power of the Wicked One": 1 John 5:19 states that the entire world is under the sway of the evil one, emphasizing Satan's pervasive influence.

Expand full comment
Heidi Heil STOPS Thymectomy's avatar

1 John 5:19: "We know that we are from God, and the whole world lies in the power of the evil one". This verse indicates that the entire ungodly world system is under Satan's control.

John 12:31: Jesus says, "Now is the judgment of this world; now the ruler of this world will be cast out". This signifies Satan's influence over the world system, and its eventual removal.

2 Corinthians 4:4: "The god of this age has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ". Here, Satan is depicted as a "god" who deceives people from understanding the truth of the gospel.

Ephesians 2:2: "He is the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who is now at work in the sons of disobedience". This verse positions Satan as a powerful force operating in the "invisible realm immediately about the earth

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

I'm no biblical scholar by a long shot, but you make a lot more sense to me. If God is directing everything down here, that means free will doesn't exist, we are all NPCs, going through orchestrated motions.

Expand full comment
Dan’l's avatar

There’s almost no way to secure these outdoor events, even when working with law enforcement. (The shooter was 200 YDS out.)

I wish it wasn’t necessary: all political events should be moved indoors, or into stadiums, or other controlled environments.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar
5hEdited

Comments like "climb out of your rabbit holes" only work among dummies. Most here are not dummies, that tactic works much better among clueless leftists. I think they got the right guy, but I appreciate skepticism. Hasn't the last 5 years taught you that? Kenyon has some good questions that need answers.

Expand full comment
Dan’l's avatar

: : edited : : to apologize; meant to be humorous, rather than offensive.

Expand full comment
Paula's avatar

Follow the money in family and privately

Expand full comment
terrysbiz's avatar

I agree completely! It appears "The Vigilant Fox" is not so Vigilant after all??? To fail to see & grasp the significance of the points you raise is inexcusable?, impossible in fact for anyone with critical thinking skills. For the Vigilant Fox to fail to grasp or raise these issues, there can be only one explanation. He is controlled opposition. As is Tucker Carlson. He also is not that far from the official narrative.

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

Agree . . a lot doesn't add up. That said, hatred of Christianity / indoctrination to hate what they grew up with can make someone a willing patsy. But there's probably more to this ...

https://georgewebb.substack.com/p/earshot-the-charlie-kirk-murder (I don't know .. but worth considering)

Expand full comment
Eric Watson's avatar

I wonder this too

Expand full comment
NJ Election Advisor's avatar

The “sin” of questioning the genocidal zionists

Ben Shapiro jumping in while the body still warm. Distasteful and a dark, poor choice.

Expand full comment
Dan’l's avatar

Bullsh!t.

Charlie Kirk supported Israel, and the genocide is endlessly waged by the Sunni Muslim terrorists inside, and outside of, Gaza and the West Bank.

Ben Shapiro has been friends with, and a supporter of, Charlie Kirk since he first began.

Expand full comment
J Guti's avatar

It’s definitely the Zionists.

Expand full comment
Dan’l's avatar

I’m a Zionist. I didn’t do it.

Charlie Kirk was a Zionist:

Charlie Kirk was a Zionist in practice and by self-identification, especially in the sense of evangelical Christian Zionism. He supported Israel strongly, affirmed scriptural/messianic views tied to its land, and participated in Zionist events.

The facts are clear enough already to say: we know who actually killed him, and we know why he did it.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

He quit supporting Israel awhile ago. He realized that it was evil.

Expand full comment
J Guti's avatar
4hEdited

When people say the Americans did it or the Russians did it, they are referring to the people leading the government … same goes here. The Zionist regime being led by Netanyahu and his puppet master the Rothschilds are the ones in control. Collective guilt or punishment is something that Zionists like yourself tend to believe in.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

But Charlie changed his mind on Israel awhile ago; he no longer supported Israel and realized there was evil in Israel.

Expand full comment
NJ Election Advisor's avatar

The Lady doth protest too much.

Expand full comment
Dan’l's avatar

Nope… just erroneously presumed intelligence.

Expand full comment
NJ Election Advisor's avatar

Here is Charlie questioning for the zionist commenter (Dan’l) who cursed at me:

https://x.com/AtRealBen/status/1966033538865856837 Charlie 48 hours before being assassinated

And another:

https://x.com/a_westgate/status/1965932682388652402

Hard to reason with pro-murder

Even Charlie was aware of it near the end:

https://x.com/CryptoMoon2411/status/1965950148263161997

RIP, Charlie. Didn’t agree with you but as you said below:

“The way you are treating me is so repulsive” https://x.com/KAGdrogo/status/1965929694437822748

Criticizing Israel or allowing it to be criticized immediately preceded your death.

Expand full comment
Heidi Heil STOPS Thymectomy's avatar

Yes. He was hated for being a Christian.

Christians aren't meant to align with people who do not believe in Jesus and the new Testament.

Christians, above all, love, but nowhere in the Bible does it speak of aligning with other religions to war and punish its own people for speaking their minds against war.

Charlie Kirk began to speak out against the powers that funded him.

He would not have agreed with laws that censor USA citizens yet this is what his death has triggered. Laws that will take passports away from people who speak freely.

He believed in USA 🇺🇸

"USA foundation prioritizes freedom of religion ***through the separation of church and state,*** enshrined in the Constitution's First Amendment."

Expand full comment
Jeff Cook-Coyle's avatar

Have you seen the Max Blumenthal article, https://thegrayzone.com/2025/09/12/charlie-kirk-netanyahu-israel-assassination/ ?

In it, Blumenthal article, a long-time friend of Kirk's, "who also enjoyed access to President Donald Trump and his inner circle," tells the writer of Israel's fury that Kirk is leading America's youth away from Israel. Just as you say.

When I read the article, I thought that Tucker was Blumenthal's source. But it looks like he is not the one.

Expand full comment
Heidi Heil STOPS Thymectomy's avatar

I haven't seen this. Thank you for sharing it.

Expand full comment
Dan’l's avatar

Tucker’s bad about putting his own spin on the facts…

Charlie Kirk was murdered for telling the truth, most particularly about them that try to do what cannot be done (change their sex).

Expand full comment
Alanna Hartzok's avatar

Oh my! I was born into a fundamentalist Christian family and was "born again" at a young age. I do believe that Jesus was a pacifist and taught love one another - no excepetions. But I do not believe that Christianity as organized religion is tolerant in the the belief that the only way to God / Heaven is through Jesus. My parents believed, for instance, that our good Jewiish doctor would not go to heaven. Nor is organized Christianity non-violent. If it was non-violent then every Christian in the country would be out on the streets protesting US wars of aggression and imperialism and would stop the US foreign policy of "full spectrum dominance."

Christianity lost its pacifist non-violent, love-not-hate teachings when it became the official religion of the Roman Empire. The true Judeo-Christian belief recognized that the earth is God's gift (the "koina") for all to fairly share in order to secure their basic needs ("autarkeia") To get the pacifist Christians to fight the imperialist Roman wars they needed a rational invented by Augustine as "just war theory" now know as "responsibility to protect" in US foreign policy language. A nation cannot be both truly Christian and also warmongering imperialist. A Christian cannot be a real follower of Christ if they treat the earth as a market commodity and "make a killing in real estate.:" Tucker Carlson - I highly value most of your views but in this regard - Wake UP!!!!

Expand full comment
Jeff Cook-Coyle's avatar

Tucker is growing in his faith. He talks more openly and knowledgeably about Christianity than anyone else with a comparable platform in the US. Compare him to the pro-covid Tucker, and he has come a long way in his Christian understanding.

Expand full comment
Jared Rechnitzer's avatar

I don't buy it.

Deranged leftists (assuming thats what the killer was) don't kill people for being Christian. They had plenty of other things to be more mad at him about that directly affected their "ideology" - wokeness, trans, LGBT, race, etc etc that they saw Charlie as an enemy of, and a preacher of "hate" in their minds.

Why would they be more offended by Christianity than attacks against their OWN "religion"? Tucker has been off the rails for a while now and this does nothing to change my mind about him.

Expand full comment
SB Native's avatar

Thank you for covering it, and giving us the credit for being able to synthesize what we see here (because we don't see a well-rounded picture unless we find sources outside the MSM). And NO, as a Christian, and conservative in many areas, I will tolerate anyone (media, politicians, etc.) trying to blame the "rhetoric of the right" for Kirk's death. Go EFF yourselves.

Expand full comment
Proberta's avatar

...but then there’s the squib:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PsDAaQyomSRw

Expand full comment
Quatervois's avatar

Please take the time to watch this video. I've watched it 3 times, and as difficult as it is to wrap my mind around, I convinced that this guy is correct. It was a psyop. Theater. Masonic theater.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/35K21SEz1LMo

After you watch it, watch the other 3 or so videos that this guy has done on the Kirk incident. Keep in mind who it is we are dealing with here, and the other things that they have done over the past 100+ years, including 9/11.

Peace.

Expand full comment
Jan's avatar

No - I think it is much more complicated and dark - he was living in a world of 764 and 9 Angle. Websites that advocate for extreme action - sure he was angry with Kirk for his views about Trans and gays, since his partner was transing. But the support, encouragment and desire for acceptance and recognition within the 764 world stands out to me as his prime motivator to extreme behavior - evil. Start here, but know you are headed down a very, very dark world that is more violent, extreme than anything a normie, especially a religious normie could ever imagine: https://abcnews.go.com/US/fbi-opened-250-investigations-tied-violent-online-network/story?id=121480884

Expand full comment
Marc Anderson's avatar

Any consolidating movement that emerges within the social fabric will be closely monitored.

MLK also had the eloquence of relating to vast demographics of citizens. He was stopped dead.

Charlie shared the same potential threat to the 2 party power-broker system.

They will cut you off at the knees or the neck, it matters not. God has little to do with it.

Expand full comment
Paula's avatar

the ultimate enemy is Israel who has inserted itself into all Western countries and institutions.

Expand full comment
Jeff Cook-Coyle's avatar

Thanks. I was looking forward to Tucker's speaking up on Charlie. Your summary is much appreciated.

Expand full comment
Frank Priebe's avatar

Charlie was Sacrificed. Period. He was a threat to JD Vance .. who made millions on mRNA shots.. the hype now has galvanized millions to back Trump who is making billions off all of this.

🤨

Expand full comment
NJ Election Advisor's avatar

Maybe making $billions for others. Trump went into office the first time worth maybe $4 billion and left worth about $2.2 billion in 2020

Not sure his net worth today. He is mostly RE money, not sure about Vance or their family, friends, accomplices

Expand full comment
Robert Huisman's avatar

"You would think with all the Genius and brilliantence of these Times, we might find a higher purpose and a better use of the mind." -Jackson Brown.

Expand full comment
Abigail Starke's avatar

Thanks for the article. Agree with Tucker.

Expand full comment