I remember reading about this counting deception back in October 2021 when the mandates were being applied to us and all possible alternatives to taking the "vaccine" were considered to be "off the table".
What does it matter? What were they "vaccinating against"? What did people have? The flu? The "vaccine" wasn't going to work against that. It wasn't meant to. We just had a flag signalled by a PCR test that told people they had something. Any measures put in place against that has to be rubbish. Obviously, many people were given a placebo otherwise many more would be maimed or murdered. We need to focus on the real problems rather than chase chimeras.
Now that their corrupt Vax bubble has burst, they're feverishly changing the labels on Covid Vax to pretend it's a new Bird Flu, Swine Flu or Monkeypox 'cure'. Whichever one they decide to release upon the public, we don't yet know and probably, they have yet to decide.
Unjabbed Mick. I'm waiting for Fauci, Bourla, Collins, etc, to face retribution for Crimes against humanity!
The article states, "Here’s what their hospitalization in the context of SARS-2 “infection” data look like as reported using this wildly convoluted definition of unvaccinated." But you are also correct that there was no real way to tell what people had. However, it does show a desire to distort the data and that is the more telling part.
Hey OP, it is a normal thing to consider someone vaccinated after a delay. This is a matter of biology, getting the shot doesn't make you magically immune. The 14 days delay corresponds to the time immune response is stable. Don't spread misinformation, ty.
An ethical scientist would have questioned the CDC, rather than mocked and accused without allowing the authors a chance to provide context and explanation for public access data. And when you read "highly likely" regarding any reinterpretation of hospitalization and excessive death data, it should immediately suggest confirmation bias, as it did in the closely related Italian study. If you are intending upon finding "nefarious intention" - as this author certainly was intended here - you certainly will find it.
The Establishment seems to encourage deception and lies relating to Safety, efficacy, Deadly impact and long term depopulation impact on human health.
Their deadly mRNA injections, called vaccines, are promoted in spite of the devastation they cause, while Big Pharma continue to make fortunes as people die as a consequence of their poisons.
..... and still Trump and Kennedy allow the Prep Act to be used as Big Pharma's 'Licence to Kill'.
Adapt behavioral insights to strengthen public trust: Nudging in public policy continues to face concerns related to manipulation, paternalism, and the removal of choice. However, as Sunstein and other proponents argued, all government programs are at some level applying choice architecture and nudging.
You could say that the first one began in 2009, when the US government recruited Cass Sunstein to head The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) to streamline regulations. In 2010, the UK established the first Behavioural Insights Unit (BIT) on a trial basis, under the Cabinet Office. Other countries followed suit, including the US, Australia, Canada, Netherlands, and Germany. Shortly after, countries such as India, Indonesia, Peru, Singapore, and many others started exploring the application of behavioral insights to their policies and programs. International institutions such as the World Bank, UN agencies, OECD, and EU have also established behavioral insights units to support their programs. And just this month, the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland launched its own Behavioral Economics Unit.
The Future
As eMBeD, the behavioral science unit at the World Bank, continues to support governments across the globe in the implementation of their units, here are some common questions we often get asked.
It was a strange time. The political parties that had a reputation for representing and defending the working class mostly were worse offenders than were the political parties that had a reputation for best serving the elites. Human rights and bodily autonomy, both very important working class issues were ignored. Discussion and the search for truth were ignored.
I remember reading about this counting deception back in October 2021 when the mandates were being applied to us and all possible alternatives to taking the "vaccine" were considered to be "off the table".
Yes, that old case counting window bias and the Lyons-Weiler/Fenton effect! See https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37452751/ and This Second Most Important COVID19 Studies Bias, the Lyons-Weiler/Fenton/Neil Bias, is Confirmed as "Case-Counting Window Bias" https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/lyons-weilerfenton-bias-confirmed first identified by yours truly in The Defender: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/discrepancies-modernas-fda-report-demand-answers/
If you have only just figured this out, you really really have not been paying attention the last 5+ years
What does it matter? What were they "vaccinating against"? What did people have? The flu? The "vaccine" wasn't going to work against that. It wasn't meant to. We just had a flag signalled by a PCR test that told people they had something. Any measures put in place against that has to be rubbish. Obviously, many people were given a placebo otherwise many more would be maimed or murdered. We need to focus on the real problems rather than chase chimeras.
Now that their corrupt Vax bubble has burst, they're feverishly changing the labels on Covid Vax to pretend it's a new Bird Flu, Swine Flu or Monkeypox 'cure'. Whichever one they decide to release upon the public, we don't yet know and probably, they have yet to decide.
Unjabbed Mick. I'm waiting for Fauci, Bourla, Collins, etc, to face retribution for Crimes against humanity!
The article states, "Here’s what their hospitalization in the context of SARS-2 “infection” data look like as reported using this wildly convoluted definition of unvaccinated." But you are also correct that there was no real way to tell what people had. However, it does show a desire to distort the data and that is the more telling part.
Lying liars will lie and keep on lying to cover up their lies.
The first two weeks after being injected are when most injuries and deaths happen. The so-called "unvaccinated."
Hey OP, it is a normal thing to consider someone vaccinated after a delay. This is a matter of biology, getting the shot doesn't make you magically immune. The 14 days delay corresponds to the time immune response is stable. Don't spread misinformation, ty.
Look at openvaers.com, then covid vaccine data, scroll down the "red box summaries" page to the graph at the bottom.
An ethical scientist would have questioned the CDC, rather than mocked and accused without allowing the authors a chance to provide context and explanation for public access data. And when you read "highly likely" regarding any reinterpretation of hospitalization and excessive death data, it should immediately suggest confirmation bias, as it did in the closely related Italian study. If you are intending upon finding "nefarious intention" - as this author certainly was intended here - you certainly will find it.
The only thing non ethical is this article that doesn't know basic biology and immune response.
The Establishment seems to encourage deception and lies relating to Safety, efficacy, Deadly impact and long term depopulation impact on human health.
Their deadly mRNA injections, called vaccines, are promoted in spite of the devastation they cause, while Big Pharma continue to make fortunes as people die as a consequence of their poisons.
..... and still Trump and Kennedy allow the Prep Act to be used as Big Pharma's 'Licence to Kill'.
Unjabbed Mick (UK Patriot). We live longer!
The Establishment seems to encourage deception and lies.
Have you heard of the NUDGE UNITS. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/article/explainer/nudge-unit
“Nudge Unit”
The Behavioural Insights team, popularly known as the ‘Nudge Unit’, is playing a big role in helping the government formulate its response to coronavi
11 MAR 2020
Jill Rutter
The Gov said 'if the people find out what we have done they will be very angry.'
So they sold the Bussiness to private companies, because then you won't go mad because it is a private company doing it.
Adapt behavioral insights to strengthen public trust: Nudging in public policy continues to face concerns related to manipulation, paternalism, and the removal of choice. However, as Sunstein and other proponents argued, all government programs are at some level applying choice architecture and nudging.
https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/developmenttalk/nudge-units-where-they-came-and-what-they-can-do
You could say that the first one began in 2009, when the US government recruited Cass Sunstein to head The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) to streamline regulations. In 2010, the UK established the first Behavioural Insights Unit (BIT) on a trial basis, under the Cabinet Office. Other countries followed suit, including the US, Australia, Canada, Netherlands, and Germany. Shortly after, countries such as India, Indonesia, Peru, Singapore, and many others started exploring the application of behavioral insights to their policies and programs. International institutions such as the World Bank, UN agencies, OECD, and EU have also established behavioral insights units to support their programs. And just this month, the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland launched its own Behavioral Economics Unit.
The Future
As eMBeD, the behavioral science unit at the World Bank, continues to support governments across the globe in the implementation of their units, here are some common questions we often get asked.
https://behavioralpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Sanders-web.pdf
abstract
“Nudge units” within governments, most notably in the
United Kingdom and the United States, seek to encourage
people to behave a certain way by using insights gained from
behavioral science. The aim is to influence people’s choices
through policies that offer the right incentive or hurdle so that
people choose the more economically beneficial options.
Getting people to save for retirement, eat more healthful
foods, and pay their taxes on time are some examples of
institutionally desirable activities. The 10-fold rise in “nudge”
projects undertaken since 2010—more than 20 countries
have deployed or expressed interest in them—have revealed
many lessons for policymakers. Chief among these lessons:
the necessity of obtaining buy-in from key political leaders
and other stakeholders, and the benefits of testing multiple
intervention strategies at once. Although detailed cost–
benefit analyses are not yet available, we estimate that
behaviorally inspired interventions can help government
agencies save hundreds of millions of dollars per year.
The one graph shows the fully vaccinated with no hospitalizations???
Great title. .it gets to the heart of the matter ... of most things that have been imposed upon us these past 6 years.
They Lied.
.
https://TheyLied.ca
.
https://TheyLied.substack.com
.
Yes lying Soulless Scum , but our Politicians, Judiciary Police, Health Professionals and unfortunately Church Hierarchy Sold us out .
It was a strange time. The political parties that had a reputation for representing and defending the working class mostly were worse offenders than were the political parties that had a reputation for best serving the elites. Human rights and bodily autonomy, both very important working class issues were ignored. Discussion and the search for truth were ignored.