Tershia caught the grammar glitch immediately, as did Kathie Duncan. But what has happened to American English in our public schools? Broadcasters, especially of the sports variety, seem to be "shoulda wenters" these days. Sad...but, perhaps, a cautionary tale about the quality of education in the United States in these perilous times
I hate it when people use the word "you guys", especially for a group of women! No one seems to remember or have studied that in English the plural form for you is YOU. A strange grammar rule, considering all Latin languages have a different plural form for you, as in Italian, tu (you singular) and voi (you plural), and even a formal you (Lei)
I expect life insurance payouts to increase for a while as the oldest "boomers" are reaching "those ages." So, it becomes all the more alarming obviously, that the insurance companies are pointing the disastrous increases.
I can definitely see payouts are larger than what should have been expected. I wonder if policy sales went up along with the payouts. If I was scared and thought I was gonna die, I'd buy a small policy to pay final costs.
What’s shocking is people are still drinking the kool aid. It was terrible that people got forced but to take it voluntarily is just stupid. Can’t teach stupid
I have examined the first source and it says that the deaths occurred among “primarily working-age people 18 to 64 who are the employees of companies that have group life insurance plans through OneAmerica.” How many excess deaths are we talking about here, they don’t tell us, 20, 200? Would suicides cover this 40%, I can’t tell. Percentage are meaningless without knowing what sample they apply to. “And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” UP TO 40%, not even consistent 40% over the whole quarter. Was it 40% in one week or one day? Was the increase calculated ‘per capita’ or a change in overall number of payouts, or in total amount paid out? Was there a significant growth in the number of policy holders? What was the effect of inflation on the size of payouts? We don’t know any of this. Just one person makes a statement, no official source. The way this is reported should be qualified as disinformation. This is not something I would use as evidence. Nobody with any scientific reputation would. BTW, excess mortality statistics for the entire country is currently running near zero in the USA (see the link below). The causative connection to vaccines is too nebulous. Sweden for example had negative excess mortality through 2021 and 2022, which is strong (even if inconclusive) evidence against any link to vaccines (there could be batch issues, but we don’t know). Excess mortality data: https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=104676
This is old news and has been picked apart ad nauseam. It was a 40% increase in death among their Group Life Insurance Policies. So it was all working people of working age. No homeless drug addicts and few suicides. Individual life is far more complicated because each policy is considered on it's own. Those results will take a lot longer.
After this the other publicly listed American insurance companies came out with similar numbers except for one the was +168% if I remember correctly, though that WAS an outlier.
Edward Dowd is turning this into a career. Mathew Crawford at roundingtheearth on Twitter and substack has looked at as well.
The British and Scottish numbers were around 40%. The european numbers were from 50% to 100% but broken down by decade and indicated the higher jab rates than England and Scotland.
Alberta, Canada, reported a 70% increase in all cause mortality during 2021 in the 0-44 year category (they blamed it on the unvaccinated. Lol). If only 1/3 were jabbed (many too young, others too smart) you'd be looking at 200% in the jabbed (there's no other reasonable explanation. The jab is the only thing that's changed). And those people only got jabbed part way through the year.
Child coffins in the US are up 400% at the largest manufacturer. 20% for adult coffins.
It goes on and on. Ask around. I know one person who was sick enough from covid to got to the hospital but I know of dozens that died of the jab. Not to mention the numbers severely disabled.
Your points are good though. Each of us shouldn't have to sort out and make sense of this news. My opinion is it's no more bother to report things clearly and with facts than to muddle the issue. I've wasted so much time trying to figure different things out and usually gotten nowhere. I'm tired of the misreporting by Stew Peters and his ilk. I think this is primarily a misdirection. See bailiwicknews at substack for the REAL issue.
It doesn't help that the governments report things in a way that makes it nearly impossible to figure out if the jabbed are better off or not.
Spend more time on substack. You'll get a headache trying to follow the analysis of the stats that the big brains have figured out for us. It sucks but it is what it is.
Tobeyrogers, jessicar, igorchudov, stevekirsch, eugippius, boriquagato, amidwesterndoctor. Substacks that will get you started.
My advice is if you are not convinced the jabs are dangerous than spend time looking into the stuff I talked about.
If you are already convinced they're dangerous and ineffective, stop wasting your time on this distraction and go to bailiwicknews at substack. It worse than people dying from the jab.
Go to the article dated Apr 28, 2022. Titled American Domestic Bioterrorism Program.
Of course the jabs are dangerous. Pfizer’s own clinical studies proved that much. The question is the magnitude of the harm, and to quantify this requires rigorous analysis. Apart from overall excess mortality there are no reliable signals, too many confounders, too much hearsay and speculation, category mistakes, statistical errors. Moreover, Sweden shows no excess mortality. The main difference between Sweden and others: no lockdowns.
If that we’re true, we would’ve seen a spike in 2020 when they were getting hit with COVID, then a drop as the vaccines rolled out and protected them. Also, there would’ve been a natural spike then drop due to those who are susceptible to COVID dying off in 2020.
Playing devil's advocate for a bit here. I do definitely believe the vaxx is harmful and I do think these data are somewhat showing it, but I don't think quite as strongly as suggested.
3 of those 5 companies were already trending up prior to the pandemic and the vaccine. You can see that the 2021 graph doesn't look that unusual considering the previous trend where they were paying out more each year. That's probably because those companies were growing, adding clients and therefore also paying out more. So the trend may have simply continued during 2021, maybe accelerated a bit.
Then for those same 3 companies (out of five), if you take the 2017-2019 period as a baseline and average them, obviously you get a low baseline for just the reason I mentioned. That doesn't prove a huge rise.
Metropolitan, like you say, is a little different. It probably should have gone down if the vaccines worked, which we know they don't. So you can say why did it go up sharply in 2020. Could be Covid, or maybe the intubations and hysteria and all of that. Could be lockdowns. Then maybe it should have gone down because the lockdowns were over but it didn't, could be the vaccine.
So I'm not saying there's nothing there... but I do think it's not as clear cut and dramatic as it may seem at first. At least based on these data.
Excellent! I am going to forward to nonbelievers. Thank you! (You might consider using "gone" instead of "went.") Best!
Thanks! "Went" was a direct quote, but Del used "gone," so that works, too!
These numbers do not lie. It’s a vaccine Holocaust.
Tershia caught the grammar glitch immediately, as did Kathie Duncan. But what has happened to American English in our public schools? Broadcasters, especially of the sports variety, seem to be "shoulda wenters" these days. Sad...but, perhaps, a cautionary tale about the quality of education in the United States in these perilous times
I hate it when people use the word "you guys", especially for a group of women! No one seems to remember or have studied that in English the plural form for you is YOU. A strange grammar rule, considering all Latin languages have a different plural form for you, as in Italian, tu (you singular) and voi (you plural), and even a formal you (Lei)
And what happened to adverbs? Drive safe? What!?
Critical thinking though is far more important than grammar as long as you can communicate precisely, but ungrammatically.
I expect life insurance payouts to increase for a while as the oldest "boomers" are reaching "those ages." So, it becomes all the more alarming obviously, that the insurance companies are pointing the disastrous increases.
I can definitely see payouts are larger than what should have been expected. I wonder if policy sales went up along with the payouts. If I was scared and thought I was gonna die, I'd buy a small policy to pay final costs.
Just a grammatical correction : “It should have GONE down”, not WENT.
What’s shocking is people are still drinking the kool aid. It was terrible that people got forced but to take it voluntarily is just stupid. Can’t teach stupid
I guess "they" didnt foresee this coming to surface.
I have examined the first source and it says that the deaths occurred among “primarily working-age people 18 to 64 who are the employees of companies that have group life insurance plans through OneAmerica.” How many excess deaths are we talking about here, they don’t tell us, 20, 200? Would suicides cover this 40%, I can’t tell. Percentage are meaningless without knowing what sample they apply to. “And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” UP TO 40%, not even consistent 40% over the whole quarter. Was it 40% in one week or one day? Was the increase calculated ‘per capita’ or a change in overall number of payouts, or in total amount paid out? Was there a significant growth in the number of policy holders? What was the effect of inflation on the size of payouts? We don’t know any of this. Just one person makes a statement, no official source. The way this is reported should be qualified as disinformation. This is not something I would use as evidence. Nobody with any scientific reputation would. BTW, excess mortality statistics for the entire country is currently running near zero in the USA (see the link below). The causative connection to vaccines is too nebulous. Sweden for example had negative excess mortality through 2021 and 2022, which is strong (even if inconclusive) evidence against any link to vaccines (there could be batch issues, but we don’t know). Excess mortality data: https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=104676
This is old news and has been picked apart ad nauseam. It was a 40% increase in death among their Group Life Insurance Policies. So it was all working people of working age. No homeless drug addicts and few suicides. Individual life is far more complicated because each policy is considered on it's own. Those results will take a lot longer.
After this the other publicly listed American insurance companies came out with similar numbers except for one the was +168% if I remember correctly, though that WAS an outlier.
Edward Dowd is turning this into a career. Mathew Crawford at roundingtheearth on Twitter and substack has looked at as well.
The British and Scottish numbers were around 40%. The european numbers were from 50% to 100% but broken down by decade and indicated the higher jab rates than England and Scotland.
Alberta, Canada, reported a 70% increase in all cause mortality during 2021 in the 0-44 year category (they blamed it on the unvaccinated. Lol). If only 1/3 were jabbed (many too young, others too smart) you'd be looking at 200% in the jabbed (there's no other reasonable explanation. The jab is the only thing that's changed). And those people only got jabbed part way through the year.
Child coffins in the US are up 400% at the largest manufacturer. 20% for adult coffins.
It goes on and on. Ask around. I know one person who was sick enough from covid to got to the hospital but I know of dozens that died of the jab. Not to mention the numbers severely disabled.
Your points are good though. Each of us shouldn't have to sort out and make sense of this news. My opinion is it's no more bother to report things clearly and with facts than to muddle the issue. I've wasted so much time trying to figure different things out and usually gotten nowhere. I'm tired of the misreporting by Stew Peters and his ilk. I think this is primarily a misdirection. See bailiwicknews at substack for the REAL issue.
It doesn't help that the governments report things in a way that makes it nearly impossible to figure out if the jabbed are better off or not.
Spend more time on substack. You'll get a headache trying to follow the analysis of the stats that the big brains have figured out for us. It sucks but it is what it is.
Tobeyrogers, jessicar, igorchudov, stevekirsch, eugippius, boriquagato, amidwesterndoctor. Substacks that will get you started.
My advice is if you are not convinced the jabs are dangerous than spend time looking into the stuff I talked about.
If you are already convinced they're dangerous and ineffective, stop wasting your time on this distraction and go to bailiwicknews at substack. It worse than people dying from the jab.
Go to the article dated Apr 28, 2022. Titled American Domestic Bioterrorism Program.
Of course the jabs are dangerous. Pfizer’s own clinical studies proved that much. The question is the magnitude of the harm, and to quantify this requires rigorous analysis. Apart from overall excess mortality there are no reliable signals, too many confounders, too much hearsay and speculation, category mistakes, statistical errors. Moreover, Sweden shows no excess mortality. The main difference between Sweden and others: no lockdowns.
Could it possibly be the mortality of the aging baby boomers? The charts stair-step rather evenly which could suggest a secular trend???
If that we’re true, we would’ve seen a spike in 2020 when they were getting hit with COVID, then a drop as the vaccines rolled out and protected them. Also, there would’ve been a natural spike then drop due to those who are susceptible to COVID dying off in 2020.
Playing devil's advocate for a bit here. I do definitely believe the vaxx is harmful and I do think these data are somewhat showing it, but I don't think quite as strongly as suggested.
3 of those 5 companies were already trending up prior to the pandemic and the vaccine. You can see that the 2021 graph doesn't look that unusual considering the previous trend where they were paying out more each year. That's probably because those companies were growing, adding clients and therefore also paying out more. So the trend may have simply continued during 2021, maybe accelerated a bit.
Then for those same 3 companies (out of five), if you take the 2017-2019 period as a baseline and average them, obviously you get a low baseline for just the reason I mentioned. That doesn't prove a huge rise.
Metropolitan, like you say, is a little different. It probably should have gone down if the vaccines worked, which we know they don't. So you can say why did it go up sharply in 2020. Could be Covid, or maybe the intubations and hysteria and all of that. Could be lockdowns. Then maybe it should have gone down because the lockdowns were over but it didn't, could be the vaccine.
So I'm not saying there's nothing there... but I do think it's not as clear cut and dramatic as it may seem at first. At least based on these data.