Solid work pulling together the pacemaker vulnerability angle here. In practice, I've seen a few cases where folks with implants near retail spaces get interferencefrom just the Bluetooth mesh alone, not even 5G yet. Thing is, the FCC's distance calcs assume static exposure but nobody stays in one spot, so the actual risk might be way higher than their models predict.
Seems strange there's no easy access to 40 to 70ghz EMF DETECTORS.even pole workers not allowed to have 50+ GHZ EMF meters only warning light systems if above 40ghz is activated with too much watts or amps..Yet many routers and cell towers law enforcement,hospital gear goes go to 60ghz but with amps low enough where not too dangerous allegedly..others say anything over 35 ghz damages cells readily if too close or amped..so clarification on amperage/watts safe zone when 35-70ghz is used is key and seems missing info for us with distance and if beamforming (1 to 20+ inch beam)or not being other key info as if not in beam but 360 degree wide spectrum the impact on a human would be less if in the way..So how a EMF detector is used and positioned can effect dramatically the reading,even a shift of a few inches in theory could multiply the radiation reading in open air far hundred plus yards from a source and how close to a router ,smart meter phone as well..Weird no one seems to know basic safety lines here.
Affirmative. It’s all bad - all forms of wireless comms (including Bluetooth & wi-fi), microwave “ovens”, etc.
Even the legacy electric transmission infrastructure developed over 100 years ago is problematic due to adopting hertz levels that are not particularly kind to mammalian biology.
A decent emf detector is very useful in identifying “hot zones”. LiFi internet routers are a great, high speed option for eliminating Wi-Fi radiation (save lower power radiation from neighbors, etc.).
Ultimately the level of risk is a factor of distance and strength of signal. Best place to start is one’s surveillance device.
Solid work pulling together the pacemaker vulnerability angle here. In practice, I've seen a few cases where folks with implants near retail spaces get interferencefrom just the Bluetooth mesh alone, not even 5G yet. Thing is, the FCC's distance calcs assume static exposure but nobody stays in one spot, so the actual risk might be way higher than their models predict.
Seems strange there's no easy access to 40 to 70ghz EMF DETECTORS.even pole workers not allowed to have 50+ GHZ EMF meters only warning light systems if above 40ghz is activated with too much watts or amps..Yet many routers and cell towers law enforcement,hospital gear goes go to 60ghz but with amps low enough where not too dangerous allegedly..others say anything over 35 ghz damages cells readily if too close or amped..so clarification on amperage/watts safe zone when 35-70ghz is used is key and seems missing info for us with distance and if beamforming (1 to 20+ inch beam)or not being other key info as if not in beam but 360 degree wide spectrum the impact on a human would be less if in the way..So how a EMF detector is used and positioned can effect dramatically the reading,even a shift of a few inches in theory could multiply the radiation reading in open air far hundred plus yards from a source and how close to a router ,smart meter phone as well..Weird no one seems to know basic safety lines here.
Can you explain bit more on what li fi internet routers are? How to access?
Affirmative. It’s all bad - all forms of wireless comms (including Bluetooth & wi-fi), microwave “ovens”, etc.
Even the legacy electric transmission infrastructure developed over 100 years ago is problematic due to adopting hertz levels that are not particularly kind to mammalian biology.
A decent emf detector is very useful in identifying “hot zones”. LiFi internet routers are a great, high speed option for eliminating Wi-Fi radiation (save lower power radiation from neighbors, etc.).
Ultimately the level of risk is a factor of distance and strength of signal. Best place to start is one’s surveillance device.