Discussion about this post

User's avatar
BBKing4Freedom's avatar

The numbers will speak louder than the rhetoric. 13 of 8000 thus far, and I doubt that will change much without major changes. Ask yourself, “why”? Let me answer that question for you: More shadow policy. More of the same Covid-era shadow policy. Such policy exists because decades of long-term, embedded bureaucrats have written and applied policies and regulations that are not in line with (and often directly oppose) actual law. Case in point: applying Title 5 USC Federal Civilian Employee pay laws to Title 37 USC uniformed service member pay laws for the purpose of negating backpay. It turns out, President Trump’s promos of full backpay is being subverted. The September 2025 emergency Supreme Court decision on Trump vs Slaughter may be the first step in undoing the bureaucratic cabal. I am hopeful and expectant of the December 2025 hearing. Please pray that SCOTUS rules in a manner that stops unlawful policymakers in their tracks, and allows the Executive Branch to clean house! Then maybe our troops will receive the “full backpay” promised, and we can start rebuilding trust with the Department of War (leading to more service member reinstated and adding new recruits).

Expand full comment
Grant Smith's avatar

I don't know what motivated REN to cover this. The "VIP treatment" development is not particularly helpful because there are more expeditious ways to return troops to service that were recommended in the 3SEP25 listening session. There currently seems to be support for ongoing efforts to improve the process, which is good because it still requires much improvement. So far I'm only tracking 2 individuals brought back onto active duty, one of which hasn't been paid. Like I said efforts continue and there are reasons to be hopeful, but the "VIP treatment" outlined in the updated policy guidance is not one of them IMO.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?