Precrime Is Here: They’re Deciding If You’re Dangerous | Daily Pulse

It’s not about what you told AI. It’s about what they think you’ll do next.

Feb 25, 2026

STORY #1 - A growing list of global elites are stepping down as the Epstein dominoes begin to fall.

Yet even as millions of documents continue to surface, one question refuses to die: is this real accountability, or carefully managed damage control?

After the Justice Department dumped millions of Epstein documents, resignations followed fast. Thomas Pritzker left Hyatt after emails showed he kept in contact with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell beyond the 2008 conviction. Goldman Sachs’ Kathryn Ruemmler resigned over friendly exchanges years after his plea deal. DP World’s Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, Paul Weiss chairman Brad Karp, and diplomats like Mona Juul and Peter Mandelson also exited as scrutiny intensified.

Then came the bombshell report this week that Epstein secretly stashed computers and CDs in storage units across the U.S., material investigators may never have searched.

How can anyone declare the case closed when all of this is still being uncovered?

Watch Maria’s full report and see the receipts for yourself.

#ad: Every major financial crash follows a similar script.

Those with better tools use volatility to build wealth. Everyone else is told to wait and hope.

For decades, strategies like this were limited to hedge funds and billionaires. Now, everyday Americans can access them through a crypto IRA powered by Animus AI.

The system runs 24/7, scanning markets and responding in real time, designed to thrive in volatility instead of fearing it.

Book your free consultation at DailyPulseCrypto.com and supercharge your retirement today.

Supercharge Your Retirement Today

DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

STORY #2 - Louisiana regulators just handed Big Tech a blank check, and your electric bill is on the hook.

As AI replaces workers across the country, regular electric customers could now be forced to bankroll the very data centers driving those job losses.

A fast-tracked policy quietly pushed through the Louisiana Public Service Commission shifts massive infrastructure costs onto the public, with almost no transparency and virtually zero public input. Under the so-called “Lightning Amendment,” ratepayers could be stuck covering more than half, and potentially up to 75%, of the capital costs needed to power AI data centers built for companies like Meta.

These energy-guzzling facilities can demand power on the scale of entire cities, yet the policy moved forward with barely anyone aware it was happening. Worse, there’s no clear written order, making long-term accountability nearly impossible.

But here’s what they didn’t count on.

Communities in New Brunswick, New Jersey and San Marcos, California just stopped similar projects cold. When local citizens showed up, they won.

So who approved this, and why did almost no one know?

Watch Maria’s report before this locks in costs you never agreed to.

#ad: Gold has endured through every economic collapse in modern history.

It can’t be printed, digitally restricted, or inflated away. Its supply is limited. Its value isn’t dictated by a central authority. And it reflects the biblical principle of honest money.

If you’re serious about minimizing Caesar’s grip on your life, start by reconsidering where you store your hard-earned savings.

Start reading The Bible and Gold for free and discover what Scripture says about money, sovereignty, and protecting what you’ve worked for.

Reserve your copy now at dailypulsebible.com.

Reserve Your Copy

DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.

STORY #3 - Months before a Canadian man in a dress carried out a school massacre, OpenAI employees were disturbed by what he was asking ChatGPT and internally debated whether to call police.

Let that sink in.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Jesse Van Rootselaar’s ChatGPT activity was flagged in June 2025 after he described gun violence scenarios detailed enough to alarm staff. Roughly a dozen employees debated contacting police, some convinced the threat of real-world bloodshed was substantial. In the end, the company banned his account, concluding it did not meet the threshold of “credible and imminent” harm.

Seven months later, police say he killed eight people and injured 25 before taking his own life.

But what exactly did ChatGPT flag? The public hasn’t seen the material, only been told it was concerning. We’re expected to trust unnamed sources and opaque AI systems to decide who gets reported to law enforcement.

After tragedies like this, fear spreads fast, and surveillance suddenly sounds reasonable. But once AI is allowed to evaluate intent and label people as risks, where does that line get drawn, and who draws it?

Watch Maria’s full report before forming your conclusion.

#ad: Did you know Windows has unleashed AI with a photographic memory of everything you do on your computer?

It takes screenshots and analyzes them in near real time.

In the wrong hands, that makes your activity searchable, including private photos, texts, emails, even messages you never send.

That’s modern Big Tech. Most people don’t even realize it’s happening.

Privacy Academy is hosting a FREE live webinar on Thursday, March 5 at 7PM Central, where you’ll learn how Big Tech is being weaponized, why privacy promises don’t always match reality, and how switching to a Linux operating system can instantly solve many privacy concerns.

👉 Register now: PrivacyAcademy.com/Pulse

No tech expertise required. It’s easier than you think.