Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

Powerful take on Huang's 90% AI-generated knowledge prediction. The distinction he makes between human-written textbooks and AI-synthesized content is technically sound, but it sidesteps a critical issue: knowledge generation isn't value-neutral. AI models inherit biases from training data, and when they become the primary knowledge source, those biases get amplified and normalized at scale. The bigger risk isnt AI hallucinations, its the systematic erasure of diverse perspectives that dont fit dominant training corpora. Huang's optimism needs to acount for epistemic monoculture.

No posts

Ready for more?