Israel Blows Up Lebanese Town of Naquora
Video footage reveals explosive charges exploding what appears to be the entire village...
This article originally appeared on Focal Points and was republished with permission.
Guest post by John Leake
How does one justify laying explosive charges all over a town in southern Lebanon and detonating them at once, thereby destroying what appears to be the entire village?
Naqoura was a coastal village on the border with Israel that was the seat of the headquarters for the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL). It was known for its picturesque coastline, citrus groves, and high quality agriculture.
A video is now circulating of the town being blown up by explosive charges detonating at once.
Israeli frames the demolition as necessary to neutralize Hezbollah infrastructureâthat is, rocket launch sites, tunnels, and military positions embedded in or near civilian areas.
Critics, including Lebanese officials, human rights organizations (Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch) argue that the scale of destructionâoften post-ceasefire or targeting civilian homesâwent beyond military necessity and was therefore a form of collective punishment.
The townâs homes, businesses, and infrastructure have been so devastated that returning residents are finding it largely unrecognizable, with piles of rubble where neighborhoods once stood.
What are we in the United States to believe about the deliberate, explosive demolition of an entire village?
Throughout history, it has been extremely difficult for ordinary citizens to evaluate what their governments tell them about this kind of organized, violent action against a civilian settlement.
Administrators of military occupied regions have long claimed that aggressive action against civilian settlements and even densely populated cities was necessary to eliminate armed âbanditsâ and âillegal combatantsâ hiding in residential areas.
Citizens back home, digesting radio and newspaper reports, can either believe the governmentâs representations or question them. In order to do this, they must first decide how much (or how little) they trust their government and media to tell the truth about such matters of violent controversy.
For example, on February 7, 1968, an American army major told journalist Peter Arnett that it was ânecessary to destroy the city [of Báșżn Tre, in the Mekong Delta] to save it,â after US forces destroyed 85% of the city to rout Viet Cong forces from the town.
What do you think about the detonation of Naquora? Do you believe it was necessary to destroy the village?
Copyright 2026 Focal Points
