14 Comments
User's avatar
Jim Toscas's avatar

This would be worse than in the past. Historically, when regimes became too oppressive, the public would revolt– removing (and even killing) their former rulers. With everything done through remote and virtual technology, where would you go to even FIND your oppressors? They could be living in another country.

Expand full comment
ArnoldF's avatar

AI is being programmed to create 1984.

Expand full comment
Bob.vanuatu@hotmail.com's avatar

I already live under a rock off grid on a remote island with a second passport but this will impact me and as soon as the money is digital we are all screwed no mater where you live

Expand full comment
✨PhoenixRose ✨'s avatar

I think we may need an extra module (or two or three…) based on what was reported in this video:

https://youtu.be/vtTKOtJ5ABc?si=haOvgi-rjLPLfvUU

What do you think??? Just saw this today and my head is spinning! Can’t believe this came out a month ago and basically states (among several other critical things that the US government has been occupied by the CCP and is working with the OWO regimes on implementing our cyborg/synthetic/humanity extinction via 6G survival of the fittest! And NOT anywhere on the news nor anywhere else..

Expand full comment
We're All Hebrew's avatar

A repeat of 1-4 Maccabees and the days of Noah

Expand full comment
slaicker1's avatar

OK, so what happens when “they“ go to swipe 500 bucks from your account but it only has $31.57 in it like mine does at the moment until I get paid again?

Expand full comment
John Gross's avatar

No problemo! They wait until you are paid, then take the 500 plus another 1000 for late payment. Suddenly you’re back to $31.57 and nothing to show for a month’s work.

Expand full comment
Dave Esplin's avatar

Seems to me that government cannot police beliefs, given that a belief is something you have no conscious control over. Given that an opinion is a belief, frame your views as opinion. It's only when you frame your opinion as fact, that you risk running afoul of government censors. Alex Jones' undoing happened because he stated his opinion concerning Sandy Hook as fact. He could have raised his objections by saying that he wasn't convinced by the official narrative and inviting the government to provide evidence to support their contentions. Then the onus would be on the government to convince him. Of course, government doesn't want to be in a situation where they're required to convince the public of anything. They prefer the status quo where they tell the public what to believe and have us believe them without ever providing any supporting evidence.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

When you have RFK Jr of all people, leader of MAHA, hoping to get everybody tethered to a "wearable", we're in trouble.

Expand full comment
Tami is healing ❤️‍🩹's avatar

I stopped wearing mine as soon as i heard he wanted everyone to have one FOR health.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

It's hard to believe people actually think wearing a monitoring device will make them healthy. They can have the benefit of providing an incentive. Years ago my wife and I wore the old-fashioned pedometers for a while, that are triggered by the movement of your steps. It can make you walk more as you see your step count move up. We soon ditched them though. Everybody knows what to do. Eat real food, get varied exercise including resistance training, sleep enough. Simple. Not necessarily easy. So people want to strap something on to feel like they're doing something healthy when all it's doing is adding to your EMF exposure.

Expand full comment
Sherry 1's avatar

The world has become horrifying. Terrifying. Seems we have no-one to fight and no-where to hide.

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

Everything is moving so fast. If you blink you will miss something and maybe they will run right over us if we do. Thank you.

Expand full comment
John's avatar

Duhhh 🙄

Expand full comment