Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mouzer's avatar

What most people don't know is this long shutdown, caused by Democrat filibuster, could have been shortened by changing the rules for Senate filibuster. Currently there is a gentleman's agreement that the "silent filibuster" is allowed. That means all some Senator has to do is say they are filibustering. Period. And it takes a vote of 60 to end the filibuster.

But, the rules of the filibuster can be changed with a simple majority vote to require any filibuster to speak without taking a break, like it used to in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. Everyone would get to talk, each declaring a filibuster. But, once that is over, the filibuster dies and the vote in the Senate reverts to a simple majority. And, there would have been no need to completely get rid of filibusters, which many oppose or to work to reach a 60 Senator vote.

Imagine if all those decrepit Democrat Senators tried to stand and talk very long. The filibuster would have been over a lot sooner. But, while many Senators do not understand the details of their Byzantine rules, some do. So, while the Democrats did the filibuster, there was a path to end it sooner, rather than later, but IMO both sides believed it would advantage them, while ignoring the true needs of the country. I do believe also that in general, news media, are culpable as well, becoming merely he-said, she-said gossip mongers who fail to do any research.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?